- Joined
- Aug 10, 2004
- Messages
- 106,542
- Reaction score
- 206
What is Shane Carwin's finishing rate?Yes, yes you do. It's not like they only counted Jackson's losses and no other team's.
What is Shane Carwin's finishing rate?Yes, yes you do. It's not like they only counted Jackson's losses and no other team's.
He had one fight in 2012 and it wasn't under Jackson.
What is Shane Carwin's finishing rate?
So essentially the reason Greg has the lowest finishing percentage is because his fighters lost half of their fights.16 out of 48 is the same percentage, no matter if some of the loses are finishes - 16 and 48 stay the same.
And yeah, it seems that he included loses, because that ~ 31% seems to be correct when it's finishes/all fights.
If it's retarded or not is another question.
if you went and looked into att, aka, blackzillians ECT and then also compared their fighters who are not in the ufc, greg jacksons will still have the lowest.
how can you add all the non ufc fighters from jacksons but non of the other fighters from the other teams you idiot.
if you went and looked into att, aka, blackzillians ECT and then also compared their fighters who are not in the ufc, greg jacksons will still have the lowest.
how can you add all the non ufc fighters from jacksons but non of the other fighters from the other teams you idiot.
...
EDIT: Some people are saying it's a finishing rate for all fights total, which would be retarded imo. Why would you include losses to calculate finishes , where there by definition can't be any? You would have to include losses by finish also in that case.
...
Lol, if so, then someone seriously screwed his statistic up...
That's like 100% difference.
First off nice work TS.
Second it is actually retarded and indefensible to calculate finishes without counting losses.
Every single fight entered has a range of outcomes. You can finish or not. If you do not finish that fight that counts against you.
Here is how absurd your statistic gets and why it is worthless.
Tony WildCard Ferguson is the most successful finisher in the history of the sport of MMA by your stat as he finished 100% of his wins. While others can tie him, no one can be a better finisher.
So according to your stat what is this amazing Anthony WildCard Fergusons record?
He is 2 wins and 16 losses with both wins via finish for a 100% finish rate.
Now to demonstrate how retarded your view is if you had another fighter who fought the same 18 opponents winning all 18 fights, 9 via finish and 9 via decision he would have a 50% finish rate. Worse then WildCard. WTF?
When fighters say "I finish fights" they mean just that. Give them a fight and they are likely to finish it. To calculate how good a fighter is at finishing fights you need to calculate it as a percent of ALL fights.
Thus Wildcards finish rate is 2 of 18 fights or 11%. He is a low end finisher. ANd fighter B is a 50% finisher and substantially better then Anthony. Done the correct way the stats tell you that. Done your way, the wrong way, we have no choice but to accept WIldcard as a far better finisher then Anderson SIlva and maybe Anderson should go train with him to learn how to finish at a higher rate.
:|
so when someone asks you the percentage of opponents you knock out........... if you have a record of 1-9 you'd say you knock out 100% of your opponents........ not 10%? lmfao
No it doesn't.First off nice work TS.
Second it is actually retarded and indefensible to calculate finishes without counting losses.
Every single fight entered has a range of outcomes. You can finish or not. If you do not finish that fight that counts against you.
its stupid NOT to include finishing rate from losses.
if you lost the fight you didnt finish it.
stands to reason, logically.