International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
I literally just posted a video in here of an Israeli General swearing they warn their enemies of imminent attack. Thanks for admitting that the IDF lies.

I would say basically every government and military lie, if it betters them. Not you don’t think so, you’re an idiot
 
Ah, bargaining chip. Makes sense.

I still think the 60 day heads-up for inspections under that agreement were BS though. Worse than the NFL "random drug testing"

A fully operating nuclear facility isnt going to be able to hide weapons manufacturing in 60 days. Most people forget to pay a bill or two in that amount of time, or cancel a free trial membership.
 
Ah, bargaining chip. Makes sense.

I still think the 60 day heads-up for inspections under that agreement were BS though. Worse than the NFL "random drug testing"

Few posts above you.

 
A fully operating nuclear facility isnt going to be able to hide weapons manufacturing in 60 days. Most people forget to pay a bill or two in that amount of time, or cancel a free trial membership.
Could be right
Few posts above you.

Yes I saw that too, however I tend to doubt those other countries spend as much money and energy on their latent programs and don't do it in impenetrable granite fortresses of solitude. Could be wrong of course.
 
https://isis-online.org/isis-report...n-verification-and-monitoring-report-may-2025
  • Analysis of IAEA Iran Verification and Monitoring Report — May 2025

Reports​

Analysis of IAEA Iran Verification and Monitoring Report — May 2025​

by By David Albright, Sarah Burkhard, and Spencer August Faragasso

June 9, 2025

  • Iran can convert its current stock of 60 percent enriched uranium into 233 kg of WGU in three weeks at the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), enough for 9 nuclear weapons, taken as 25 kg of weapon-grade uranium (WGU) per weapon.
  • Iran could produce its first quantity of 25 kg of WGU in Fordow in as little as two to three days.I’m
 
Of course he would say that.
CIA misses their regime toppling days and here they get a prime opportunity thanks to Trump.

IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon​

As Israel bombs Iranian nuclear sites under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection, questions mount over nuclear double standards and the credibility of the global system.

Iran accuses the IAEA of bias and complicity, while Israel – an undeclared nuclear power – remains outside treaty obligations.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi responds to allegations, addresses fears of a nuclear arms race and warns of the consequences if diplomacy fails. Is the non-proliferation regime collapsing?


In a significant admission that contradicts the assertions of the Israeli regime and US officials, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has confirmed that there is no evidence Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

Speaking to CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday, Grossi acknowledged what Iran has repeatedly stated and the UN nuclear agency has also confirmed in its reports.

“What we reported was that we did not have any proof of a systematic effort [by Iran] to move toward a nuclear weapon,” the director general of the IAEA was quoted as saying.

He reiterated that the agency’s findings align with other independent sources on the issue.

The statement marks a clarification from the UN nuclear agency following heightened scrutiny and criticism of its most recent quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear activities, which Iran dismissed as “politically motivated.
 
It seems like the GBU-57 is a lot of 'hype.' The bomb must hit flat ground at a 90-degree angle to penetrate straight down. The Fordow nuclear site is under a mountain. Mountains are not flat ground. If the bomb turns a small angle going in, it will dig a tunnel diagonally. Trump has asked for assurances and been basically told a lie.

The Claims: The GBU-57 (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) weighs 30,000 lbs, with 5,000–6,000 lbs of explosives, designed to penetrate up to 200 feet into reinforced concrete or rock before detonation. The claim is that it can reach and destroy underground facilities such as nuclear enrichment sites.

The Reality: These claims are likely overstated or misunderstood, especially by political decision-makers misinformed by defense contractors or military briefers. The bomb must hit very close to or directly above a target, such as a tunnel or chamber, to do meaningful damage. A blast cavity from the explosion is ~20–30 meters wide. If the actual tunnel is offset by more than that (30+ meters horizontally or vertically), it won't be affected.
 
Last edited:
Are you denying that a nuclear program is not a valuable bargaining chip for a country wanting financial relief?
What about hostages? Those can be valuable too! Terror attacks? Threats? All good chips to trade in for some money! I mean if I wanted to cut a deal I’d probably let the other party know I’m building a bomb! It’s just good business. No risks.
So we know diplomacy worked, threw that out the window, and now instead of trying diplomacy again we're going with a tactic that has failed throughout history?
Diplomacy didn’t stop Iran from being a menace to the region.
It would likely be for bargaining, whetther as a trade or a nuclear deterrent. This isn't super secret, that's why every nuclear power went that route.
Or. To gain nuclear weapons! Nah.
 
Definitley pro Israel taking out Iran nuke tech. Definitley not in favor of US being directly involved in war . But appears to late as imo the rubicon been crossed already due to Trumps mouf. Are where we are - no reason for half measures now we're already in. Now its about speed. Go in use the bombs wipe out all nuclear tech and eliminate their Islamic leadership n hope a better place arises . Hopefully next version will have ability to communicate and be diplomatic.

Faster US/Israel finish this the better for both an West maybe. Longer they drag feet more sympathy Iran will build (deserve it or not the left will fall all over selves to defend the "Saintly" Iran Islamic regime.

A battle of time imo right now. If Israel/US end this in 2 weeks it goes well for both if it goes longer I think while they win the battle for sure sooner or later it bites them in ass more than it ever helped.

Israel/ US need stop dragging feet and pulling punches .
 
Could be right

Yes I saw that too, however I tend to doubt those other countries spend as much money and energy on their latent programs and don't do it in impenetrable granite fortresses of solitude. Could be wrong of course.

South Korea and Japan are openly discussing getting nukes, have the technical ability to do it easily due to their extensive nuclear power programs and the majority of their populations are for getting them.
 
Last edited:

IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon​

As Israel bombs Iranian nuclear sites under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection, questions mount over nuclear double standards and the credibility of the global system.

Iran accuses the IAEA of bias and complicity, while Israel – an undeclared nuclear power – remains outside treaty obligations.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi responds to allegations, addresses fears of a nuclear arms race and warns of the consequences if diplomacy fails. Is the non-proliferation regime collapsing?


In a significant admission that contradicts the assertions of the Israeli regime and US officials, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has confirmed that there is no evidence Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

Speaking to CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday, Grossi acknowledged what Iran has repeatedly stated and the UN nuclear agency has also confirmed in its reports.

“What we reported was that we did not have any proof of a systematic effort [by Iran] to move toward a nuclear weapon,” the director general of the IAEA was quoted as saying.

He reiterated that the agency’s findings align with other independent sources on the issue.

The statement marks a clarification from the UN nuclear agency following heightened scrutiny and criticism of its most recent quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear activities, which Iran dismissed as “politically motivated.
They don’t have any access to inspect. Iran would have to show them for them to find evidence.
 
South Korea and Japan are openly discussing getting nukes, have the technical ability to do it easily and the majority of their populations are for getting them.
Do you know who they're using that as a bargaining chip against? Guessing China, but what do they get in the bargain?

Or do you think those two are just flat out going to finish making the weapons?
 
Definitley pro Israel taking out Iran nuke tech. Definitley not in favor of US being directly involved in war . But appears to late as imo the rubicon been crossed already due to Trumps mouf. Are where we are - no reason for half measures now we're already in. Now its about speed. Go in use the bombs wipe out all nuclear tech and eliminate their Islamic leadership n hope a better place arises . Hopefully next version will have ability to communicate and be diplomatic.

Faster US/Israel finish this the better for both an West maybe. Longer they drag feet more sympathy Iran will build (deserve it or not the left will fall all over selves to defend the "Saintly" Iran Islamic regime.

A battle of time imo right now. If Israel/US end this in 2 weeks it goes well for both if it goes longer I think while they win the battle for sure sooner or later it bites them in ass more than it ever helped.

Israel/ US need stop dragging feet and pulling punches .
So I take it you're going to go enlist in the Military to help expedite this process and throw those punches?
 
He didn't fund Hamas through Qatar, he allowed Qatar funding into the region. And if he didn't you would be accusing him of starving Gaza instead.

Obviously this is much different than directly arming and training Hamas, Hezbollah and other terror organizations for decades.

Just two weeks before the October 7th attacks, Netanyahu sent the head of the Mossad to Qatar to secure additional money for financial aid to Hamas.

Netanyahu is complicit in keeping Hamas afloat for years.
 
Looks like someone else had a clandestine nuclear program.
They got a nuclear bomb and nothing happened.
 
They don’t have any access to inspect. Iran would have to show them for them to find evidence.
As a non-nuclear armed signatory to the treaty, Iran is banned from acquiring nuclear weapons and is required to allow the IAEA to inspect and verify all nuclear materials and activities, including at short notice, if asked.

The agency regularly inspects Iran’s nuclear facilities, including sites like Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. The aim is to ensure that nuclear materials are only used for peaceful means and are not diverted for weapons use.

On 9 June, Mr. Grossi noted that man-made uranium particles had been found at three more, undeclared sites (Varamin, Marivan and Turquzabad). Iran, he said, had failed to provide “technically credible explanations” for the presence of the particles, despite years of consultations.


Yet somehow.... they did inspections on june 9th?

They literally have inspectors still in iran during this shit show.

Since the military attacks began almost a week ago, the IAEA has been reporting on damage at several of these facilities, including at nuclear-related sites located in Arak, Esfahan, Natanz and Tehran, and their potential radiological impact.

In his statement to the Board of Governors on 13 June, the morning of the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, the Director General recalled the numerous General Conference resolutions on the topic of military attacks against nuclear facilities, in particular, GC(XXIX)/RES/444 and GC(XXXIV)/RES/533, which provide, inter alia, that “any armed attack on and threat against nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes constitutes a violation of the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law and the Statute of the Agency”.

He also stated that, furthermore, the IAEA has consistently underlined that “armed attacks on nuclear facilities could result in radioactive releases with grave consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the State which has been attacked”, as was stated in GC(XXXIV)/RES/533.

It was the Director General’s third comprehensive statement in four days about the situation in Iran, following the statement to the Board on 13 June and one to the United Nations Security Council later the same day. In addition, the Agency has provided regular updates on its official X account.

IAEA inspectors remain present in Iran, ready to be deployed at nuclear sites when possible, even though the number of Agency staff has been reduced somewhat in light of the security situation, Director General Grossi said.

He added: “The Agency is and will remain present in Iran. Safeguards inspections in Iran will continue as required by Iran’s safeguards obligations under its NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) Safeguards Agreement, as soon as safety and security conditions allow.”
 
I mean, I think I've made my point, I think Iran is an obviously belligerent actor on the world stage that has been prolonging and fermenting conflicts all across the region and are a major contributor the continuation of the Ukrainian conflict.
Are we really going to say Iran has the lion's share of blame for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Syria and Yemen?

That is a ridiculous ahistorical reading of the record.
 
Back
Top