- Joined
- Feb 15, 2011
- Messages
- 21,721
- Reaction score
- 21,231
It’s like asking a fighter what they weigh: if they tell you they’re 173 that means they’re probably closer to 180.
You can probably safely double what ever the IDF reports has landed.
Jesus you are dense. It worked as a tactical victory. It failed at stopping Iran from further development and likely encouraged them to invest more. That's why Iran is closer to a nuke today then they were when they were complying with a diplomatic agreement that Trump blew up. These are verifiable facts.No.
It worked magically and exactly as intended, except for the reveal. It set their program back years. You don't know what you are talking about, but here you are.
As long as there are few causalities maybe we can leave it at this tit for tatIt’s like asking a fighter what they weigh: if they tell you they’re 173 that means they’re probably closer to 180.
You can probably safely double what ever the IDF reports has landed.
They used up something between like 10% of their viable known stock capable of hitting Israel from within Iran itself in that attack last year that did absolutely nothing, IIRC.
Jesus you are dense. It worked as a tactical victory. It failed at stopping Iran from further development and likely encouraged them to invest more. That's why Iran is closer to a nuke today then they were when they were complying with a diplomatic agreement that Trump blew up. These are verifiable facts.
Because Iran itself boasted the number of missiles used, it was over 700 in total, I think over 400 in the initial volley, and military onlookers track things like the known missile stockpiles (including missile types) of nations. It was an estimate I recalled.You know this how? And this attack was more robust than the previous. So you are telling me we aren’t even 48H into this and Iran is down 20% of their total ballistic stockpile? I don’t believe that for a second.
I understand you're cynical and emotional about this, but the "point" was that you had no proof, only your own assumptions by inference.Lol there's the classic madmick duck. Just spam concession accepted like a dunce instead of engaging with the point.
You're arguing that the US didn't help Israel attack even though we're literally providing support to knock down any counter attacks...so Israel can keep attacking.
Holy balls again, the best success the US ever had with delaying Iran's nuclear program was the agreement we pulled out of. Jesus Christ, I know you don't want to admit Trump was wrong there but this is just embarassing by Whippy standards.Stuxnet stopped Iran from further development by a couple of years. I repeat, it hurt their program by years. You don't know shit about it apparently and don't mind talking out of your ass constantly.
By all measures, Stuxnet was a success.
You know this how? And this attack was more robust than the previous. So you are telling me we aren’t even 48H into this and Iran is down 20% of their total ballistic stockpile? I don’t believe that for a second.
We approved the strike, to pretend otherwise is childish. As is your assumption that apparently Israel did not use previous intelligence we've provided them for this first wave of attacks.The US did not abet the last Israeli missile attack in the previous round, but we did help shoot down Iranian missiles fired at Israeli civilian population centers.
Lol what. War isn't separated into offense and defense like football. Us helping defend Israel improves the lethality of their ensuing attacks. That is helping Israel attack, period. You aren't talking nuance, you're talking out of your ass. Not to mention the munitions used yesterday were almost certainly supplied by the US, probably even in the last year or so because Israel expended its stockpile in Gaza.Helping with defense is not tantamount to helping with offense.
He's one of those dunces who swore before it was undeniable, "They aren't enriching uranium to those levels! There is no nuclear weapons program!"No.
It worked magically and exactly as intended, except for the reveal. It set their program back years. You don't know what you are talking about, but here you are.
Holy balls again, the best success the US ever had with delaying Iran's nuclear program was the agreement we pulled out of. Jesus Christ, I know you don't want to admit Trump was wrong there but this is just embarassing by Whippy standards.
One of the more worrying narratives is that should the Iranian regime make it through this intact, this will force them to hasten their search for nuclear weaponry, at which point it would be open season in the Middle East.
Saudi, Turkey, other wealthy nations will demand their own.
So fucking dumb letting Israel have theirs. That whole region needs demilitarising
And now you're hallucinating. At least it's friday, maybe you can start drinking early.^^^ Idiot thinks Stuxnet didn't slow the Iranian Nuclear Weapons program.
Would you like to post an example of me saying this? Like I said, classic madmick, always fleeing and sticking their fingers in their ears when confronted with a point they can't address.He's one of those dunces who swore before it was undeniable, "They aren't enriching uranium to those levels! There is no nuclear weapons program!"
LOL.
Saints? They are the #1 terror supporter in the world. How is that hard to understand? They have attacked the US and others numerous times that have never attacked them.That's a laundry list nearly as long as the government of Israel and the US.
I didn't say they were saints. I said that they wouldn't use nukes against Israel unless they were being invaded.
Did you happen to actually read that Israel has a much bigger military? That they spend way more and have way more? Are facts hard for you to swallow? It has nothing to do with what I think.I think if the gloves were taken off and Iran didn't have to worry about the US or NATO getting involved, it would be a much closer conflict than you think. I think Israel knows this too, which is why they're always looking for American involvement.