International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
images


Sky Ninjas

We own them and everyone in the world is now scared shitless of us.

Winning.

over 40h flight to Iran and back, it costs ~$150,000 to fly this thing for an hour + just one bunker buster bomb costs $20mil

all that money could have been invested into something of use for american people (don't you have shitload of homeless, shitload of army vets without proper medical care, crumbling infrastructure, wealth inequality, etc?) but instead it was used to bomb a country that only Israeli government gives a fuck about.

but I guess yay bombing runs that only serve to piss middle east even more and spawn even more religious terrorist nuts that will burn american flags (or worse)
 
Is still.. at the end of the day.. broken at night.
Here’s a summarized breakdown of the archived content about the 1963 "battle of letters" between JFK and Israeli leaders over the clandestine Dimona nuclear reactor. JFK was assassinated the following months:



📜 1. Background: U.S. Concerns & Early Inspections​


  • Throughout the early 1960s, the U.S. suspected Dimona, Israel’s secretly built reactor, could produce plutonium for weapons, raising fears of a Middle East nuclear arms race .
  • Kennedy had already arranged limited American inspections in 1961 and 1962 through Atomic Energy Commission experts, but concerns persisted over possible concealment .



📩 2. April–June 1963: JFK’s Demands and Israeli Pushback​


  • April 2, 1963: U.S. Ambassador Barbour formally demanded twice-annual visits to Dimona with full U.S. scientist access .
  • April 26: PM David Ben‑Gurion replied with a seven-page letter invoking existential threats—referencing “another Holocaust”—and proposed broad security guarantees, hinting at Dimona’s true purpose without explicit admission .
  • May 4: Kennedy rejected Ben‑Gurion’s diversionary strategy, emphasizing his demand for reliable access and warning that continued U.S. support could be “seriously jeopardized” otherwise .
  • Ben‑Gurion faced criticism internally for being “sick” (in Hebrew), fearful Kennedy might even use military force. Ultimately, he resigned mid-June .



🤝 3. Eshkol's Succession and the "Ultimatum" Letter​


  • Shortly after taking office, PM Levi Eshkol received the same stern letter from Kennedy—effectively an ultimatum—threatening U.S.–Israel relations if inspections were blocked .
  • Eshkol hesitated, eventually drafting several replies over six weeks. His August response agreed to “regular visits,” but tactfully avoided JFK’s twice‑yearly schedule .



🔍 4. Outcome: Inspections Begin, But U.S. Concessions Made​


  • The first U.S. inspection under these terms took place in January 1964, a few weeks after JFK was assassinated. Though scheduled as a two-day review, it took only one day and reportedly found no proof of weapons-related work .
  • Washington pressed for bi‑annual inspections, but after JFK’s death, Lyndon Johnson softened the approach. Annual visits from 1964–1969 did take place, but lacked the rigor JFK had demanded .



🧭 5. Broader Significance​


  • The 1963-64 exchange illustrates Kennedy’s strong stance against nuclear proliferation and fear of failings in his wider non‑proliferation efforts .
  • From Israel’s view, Dimona represented existential security—a strategic hedge against regional hostility. Ben‑Gurion and Eshkol viewed restraints on it as a direct threat to national survival .
  • When U.S. enforcement softened after 1963, Israel advanced facilities for plutonium separation, while maintaining a deliberate policy of nuclear ambiguity .



🔚 In summary, the “battle of letters” was a pivotal confrontation in 1963 wherein JFK demanded robust inspection of Israel’s Dimona reactor. Israel’s leaders, citing profound security fears, staved off strict verification, leading to modest concessions. Though inspections occurred, they fell short of JFK’s non‑proliferation standards—ultimately allowing Israel's near-completion of a nuclear-weapons capability under a policy of ambiguity.

 
Well yesterday we sold 12 nuclear capable F-35's to UK. So B2 least secretive mission got the military industrial complex selling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13
Here’s a summarized breakdown of the archived content about the 1963 "battle of letters" between JFK and Israeli leaders over the clandestine Dimona nuclear reactor. JFK was assassinated the following months:



📜 1. Background: U.S. Concerns & Early Inspections​


  • Throughout the early 1960s, the U.S. suspected Dimona, Israel’s secretly built reactor, could produce plutonium for weapons, raising fears of a Middle East nuclear arms race .
  • Kennedy had already arranged limited American inspections in 1961 and 1962 through Atomic Energy Commission experts, but concerns persisted over possible concealment .



📩 2. April–June 1963: JFK’s Demands and Israeli Pushback​


  • April 2, 1963: U.S. Ambassador Barbour formally demanded twice-annual visits to Dimona with full U.S. scientist access .
  • April 26: PM David Ben‑Gurion replied with a seven-page letter invoking existential threats—referencing “another Holocaust”—and proposed broad security guarantees, hinting at Dimona’s true purpose without explicit admission .
  • May 4: Kennedy rejected Ben‑Gurion’s diversionary strategy, emphasizing his demand for reliable access and warning that continued U.S. support could be “seriously jeopardized” otherwise .
  • Ben‑Gurion faced criticism internally for being “sick” (in Hebrew), fearful Kennedy might even use military force. Ultimately, he resigned mid-June .



🤝 3. Eshkol's Succession and the "Ultimatum" Letter​


  • Shortly after taking office, PM Levi Eshkol received the same stern letter from Kennedy—effectively an ultimatum—threatening U.S.–Israel relations if inspections were blocked .
  • Eshkol hesitated, eventually drafting several replies over six weeks. His August response agreed to “regular visits,” but tactfully avoided JFK’s twice‑yearly schedule .



🔍 4. Outcome: Inspections Begin, But U.S. Concessions Made​


  • The first U.S. inspection under these terms took place in January 1964, a few weeks after JFK was assassinated. Though scheduled as a two-day review, it took only one day and reportedly found no proof of weapons-related work .
  • Washington pressed for bi‑annual inspections, but after JFK’s death, Lyndon Johnson softened the approach. Annual visits from 1964–1969 did take place, but lacked the rigor JFK had demanded .



🧭 5. Broader Significance​


  • The 1963-64 exchange illustrates Kennedy’s strong stance against nuclear proliferation and fear of failings in his wider non‑proliferation efforts .
  • From Israel’s view, Dimona represented existential security—a strategic hedge against regional hostility. Ben‑Gurion and Eshkol viewed restraints on it as a direct threat to national survival .
  • When U.S. enforcement softened after 1963, Israel advanced facilities for plutonium separation, while maintaining a deliberate policy of nuclear ambiguity .



🔚 In summary, the “battle of letters” was a pivotal confrontation in 1963 wherein JFK demanded robust inspection of Israel’s Dimona reactor. Israel’s leaders, citing profound security fears, staved off strict verification, leading to modest concessions. Though inspections occurred, they fell short of JFK’s non‑proliferation standards—ultimately allowing Israel's near-completion of a nuclear-weapons capability under a policy of ambiguity.

Good post.
That is just one of the times Israelis fucked Americans over. There have been others in the past and there will be more in the future. Israel just fucked us over with this bombing in Fordow. Now Iran is at war with the US. Israel could have taken that site out of commission by using ground Specisl Operations. How many times will the topic of the holocaust be used to justify their actions? They got a free nuclear submarine from Germany with that excuse.
 

As an American, I"m tired of hearing that statement over and over. It is an extremely arrogant statement to make about your country in relation to other countries. How do you think Eropean countries feel hearing that statement over and over again. More humility would go a long way. People know where America stands, you don't have to tell them.
 
there is a very strange silence from the uber-patriotic America First MAGA types on this, which is very strange and out of character as we know how honest they are in taking inventory of their own side's mis-steps

Not what I'm seeing. This issue is splitting MAGA base and lots (including myself) are vocally against it.
 
Israel straight up can't afford B-2s either.
Why they does need. If we know that they does have ballistic missiles with enough range for Iran and are assuming that they does have thermonuclear weapons?

Modern diplomacy is death and deadly force used. Kim.
 
Donald Trump has compared his US strikes on Iran’s nuclear plants to the Hiroshima bombing.

The US President said Saturday’s strikes ended the war between Israel and Iran as he spoke at the Nato summit on Wednesday (25 June).

Mr Trump said: “That hit ended the war. I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing, that ended that war. This ended that with the war. If we didn't take that out, they would have been, they'd be fighting right now.”

 
Is WW3 still on going ?
Israel has been bombing iran for 40+ years & Iran is still under the same religious fanatics leadership - its only a matter of time before their conflict resumes. And USA will once again be on the front lines for it.

Also here is why this will continue:

Tehran will restore its nuclear program, Iranian atomic chief vows​

Mohammad Eslami says Iran prepped in advance for damage to nuclear site​



Strike Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S. Report Says​

Preliminary classified findings indicate that the attack sealed off the entrances to two facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings.

they had this whole facility purpose built so it couldn't be destroyed from the outside (and they had decades of planning and support from Russia/China and other allied nations in building it) - its in the middle of a freaking granite mountain, aint no bomb reaching its core
 
Last edited:
there is a very strange silence from the uber-patriotic America First MAGA types on this, which is very strange and out of character as we know how honest they are in taking inventory of their own side's mis-steps
There's nothing patriotic about those people. Most of them are either racist or brainwashed Christians.
I'm an Aethiest and I'm more Christian than MAGA cultist.
 
Expected to wake up and see the ceasefire was broken. Glad it wasn’t yet lol

Anyways, Axios reporting this morning that Israel is saying that the damage is very significant and “perplexed” by the leaked intel report



Also found it interesting that the leaked report is from only 1 out of many intel agencies

Iran also has yet to have any meaningful assessment and are giving conflicting reports, which Israel is intercepting and momitoring

Between the lines: The classified DIA report was based on early intelligence from just one agency, and the overall picture remains muddled — especially with Iran itself still assessing the damage and weighing its next moves.

Behind the scenes: Israeli officials said the Iranian government has been engaged in its own battle damage assessment to determine the state of its nuclear program.

  • An Israeli official with direct knowledge of intelligence on Iran told Axios that intercepted communications suggest Iranian military officials have been giving false situation reports to the country's political leadership — downplaying the extent of the damage.
  • "The Iranians themselves still don't even have a clear idea what happened to some of their nuclear facilities," a second Israeli official said.

Also very glad Axios took away the email wall where you had to provide your email to view the full article


Edit: you’d think Israel would agree with the leaked report, to goad Trump into havi mg a bruised ego and order more strikes lol
 
Back
Top