Incel - fad or reality?

I mean what do you call a dude that is sexually frustrated because he's a bit of an oddball and girls don't want to fuck him?

They are real and exist...

Incel, Sherdogger, doesn't matter what you call them.
 
These people have unattractive personalities and traits that they don't want to change, instead they'll blame liberal feminists for brainwashing all the good women. Then they have the nerve to claim their celibacy is "involuntary", please. Talk about creating your own misery and then wallowing in it.

5000 years ago some”incels” mom invented arranged marriages.
 
Cucking specifically that you either don't mind, or actually derive pleasure from your partner enjoying other partners... right?

Cucking technically applies to unknowingly raising another mans kids. But, more generally it is involuntary. Voluntary “cucking” is a fetish and no more makes someone a cuckold than putting on a nurses outfit makes someone a nurse.
 
I know this wont come as a surprise to anyone but - I am an incel.

Definitely not fiction
 
I know this wont come as a surprise to anyone but - I am an incel.

Definitely not fiction
I mean what do you call a dude that is sexually frustrated because he's a bit of an oddball and girls don't want to fuck him?

They are real and exist...

Incel, Sherdogger, doesn't matter what you call them.
Can I ask you two a question, is there hope for society? I want honest answers only. If you guys can't give me one, I will start a thread with it.
 
Cucking technically applies to unknowingly raising another mans kids. But, more generally it is involuntary. Voluntary “cucking” is a fetish and no more makes someone a cuckold than putting on a nurses outfit makes someone a nurse.

Gotcha. You learn something new urryday :)
 
Do you honestly believe that? that it's Asians fault? that they are content on being this way (like the stereotype of them being submissive suggests)? That Blacks fought to where they are today? MLK's dream has never been realized, not even for Black people in the West? you do know that don't you? I acknowledge the problem is colossal, cosmic in scale, but the problem doesn't lie in "the people". It's not difficult to address the issue, it's just that you refuse to see what's in front of you? You underestimate the power of the media? Just about everyone in my life, my family members, my brothers, my friends, strangers I've met, have all had some form of influence from the media, they really believe what they see and hear. There is no two ways about it, they are brainwashed. Do you blame someone that's been hypnotized, or do you blame the hypnotist? If you open your mind? I can show you. I promise you that. But you have to be open-minded in the first place.
When I say "the people" I mean it in juxtaposition to "the top". You're blaming the top, the media, etc. I'm saying you should be blaming the general population, not the top. You're

And I'm not saying that anyone has been brainwashed, hypnotized, etc. You are the one who said that the people are "idiots". That includes Asians, blacks, hispanics, whites, etc. and that some great unnamed "top" and "media" are what drives people like Elliot Rodgers to hate his Asian-ness.

I simply disagree with this.

Of course the media has influence on what people think. But the imagery that the media chooses to portray has its roots in the general cross section of the population. Here's a simple example - long before tv and radio, black people were considered more violent and less intelligent. Modern media continues to promote that imagery - but modern media did not create the imagery. The source is not the media. The source is the general population and their stereotypes, the media reflects that more than it creates it. It's a giant feedback loop. People have beliefs, media reflects those beliefs back at them because the people in media share the same beliefs. Validation of already held beliefs takes effect.

Which is why when media changes it's imagery, like it does now when it reflects more minorities, more mixed couples, more minorities in leadership positions, you get more people complaining about an "agenda". If the media was creating the belief systems people would be far more accepting about the changing imagery. But they're not. The new media imagery contradicts their internally held beliefs so they're trying to reject the imagery itself. If people refuse to accept the idea of a more diverse society, they will not watch it and only those programs that reinforce what they want to believe with remain.

You're seeing more minorities in positive light in the media, not because the media has changed, but because society itself has changed. As society changes, the media will change. But only as fast as the general population will support it via ad dollars and media consumption.

So, I think you're wrong. The negative imagery is not starting with media. Media is reflecting back what the society itself thinks. It plays a role but it's not the starting mechanism.
 
I’d just like to remind Sherdog that before there were Incels, there was True Forced Loneliness.


This gentleman here paved the way...


Lmao Bill and Dwayne. I used to troll these two back in the day. One time I sent Bill a direct response vid and the guy got worked up he made a reply video and uploaded it lmao
 
Lmao Bill and Dwayne. I used to troll these two back in the day. One time I sent Bill a direct response vid and the guy got worked up he made a reply video and uploaded it lmao
According to Bill now, Dwayne has turned into a troll and trolls his vids. Bill actually hosts a “TFL Saturday night live.” Maybe you should call into his channel.
 
If i told you 'incel' a decade ago you would have probably wondered if i'm autistic or something else, and if perhaps I meant to say intel. The word is new and the old (not in a bad way) world has done without it for thousands of years. How come society and civilizations have thrived without it and I mean even the idea or concept behind the word. We went from monkeys to space exploration without need of such word. Why does it suddenly wildly appear everywhere like pokemon. Is this a fad like bitcoin and fidget spinners that will rapidly melt away like steel beams or is it here to stay?

Also I would like to thank god and the wholy trinity for making this thread happen.
Probably because up until 20 years ago, most basement dwellers went completely ignored by the functioning society.

But then the internet was born, and every hateful geek who wouldn't dare voice his frustrations out loud, suddenly had a worldwide audience he could address from the safety of his laptop while hiding behind the anonymity of a fake name.
 
When I say "the people" I mean it in juxtaposition to "the top". You're blaming the top, the media, etc. I'm saying you should be blaming the general population, not the top. You're

And I'm not saying that anyone has been brainwashed, hypnotized, etc. You are the one who said that the people are "idiots". That includes Asians, blacks, hispanics, whites, etc. and that some great unnamed "top" and "media" are what drives people like Elliot Rodgers to hate his Asian-ness.

I simply disagree with this.

Of course the media has influence on what people think. But the imagery that the media chooses to portray has its roots in the general cross section of the population. Here's a simple example - long before tv and radio, black people were considered more violent and less intelligent. Modern media continues to promote that imagery - but modern media did not create the imagery. The source is not the media. The source is the general population and their stereotypes, the media reflects that more than it creates it. It's a giant feedback loop. People have beliefs, media reflects those beliefs back at them because the people in media share the same beliefs. Validation of already held beliefs takes effect.

Which is why when media changes it's imagery, like it does now when it reflects more minorities, more mixed couples, more minorities in leadership positions, you get more people complaining about an "agenda". If the media was creating the belief systems people would be far more accepting about the changing imagery. But they're not. The new media imagery contradicts their internally held beliefs so they're trying to reject the imagery itself. If people refuse to accept the idea of a more diverse society, they will not watch it and only those programs that reinforce what they want to believe with remain.

You're seeing more minorities in positive light in the media, not because the media has changed, but because society itself has changed. As society changes, the media will change. But only as fast as the general population will support it via ad dollars and media consumption.

So, I think you're wrong. The negative imagery is not starting with media. Media is reflecting back what the society itself thinks. It plays a role but it's not the starting mechanism.
Thanks for taking your time to respond with a detailed post. I agree with you on the last part. The media isn't entirely to blame. But I disagree with you on just about every other account. You are wrong on why people aren't accepting of the changing imagery. For example Obama is Black and became the president in a majority White Country, and people liked him so much, he served two terms. That contradicts your statement of the people not more accepting of the changing imagery. The reason for why some are up in arms is actually created by the media itself. The people at the top are establishing a social order in society. they want to bring in change, but at the same time, create backlash from the majority, so as to keep the change to a minimum or to a specific angle and degree.

For example the media is blaming Whites as a whole for being privilege. That's a huge accusation to place on an entire group (I can see why Whitey get so defensive). When in truth we are all privileged to be in America. Blacks have been here for as long as Whites, They were oppressed for a long time, and are mostly descendants of slaves. But a lot of Blacks today don't know their worth in society. The media certainly plays a role in this, but like you said, it's not entirely to blame. It doesn't matter if people watch/agree or not with their agenda, if you want to participate or be a part of it you have to play by their rules though, and how can people not, when it's being advertised everywhere. I don't think ad dollars and media consumption play as big factor as you like to think in what they're true intention is.btw I still haven't given you my perspective yet.
 
I am accepting of everyone, we all should have a voice, that's what equality stands for, so yes what's your answer?
Yes, I do believe there is hope. We all, IMO, have to start being honest 100% of the time, and stop falling for lies.
 
Back
Top