I'm more convinced than ever that Jon Jones is suspended

GaneHotBallsFinisher said:
Ridiculous question.

Why wouldn't they is the only viable question.

It hurts the reputation of the UFC to divulge that.
Click to expand...

The same way they hid the info before and changed venues for John? Or the way they hid the Connor behavior by replaying him attacking the bus over and over in their Promos ?
 
genecop said:
The same way they hid the info before and changed venues for John? Or the way they hid the Connor behavior by replaying him attacking the bus over and over in their Promos ?
Click to expand...

They do whatever's convenient for them and their revenue at any given time.

Reporting Jon popping again isn't good for business.

But correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Jon done something that disables testing him right now? Like a fake retirement or something.

I think Jon popped again, but I could be wrong. I just don't think reporting him doing it again would be in their best interest.
 
GaneHotBallsFinisher said:
They do whatever's convenient for them and their revenue at any given time.

Reporting Jon popping again isn't good for business.

But correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Jon done something that disables testing him right now? Like a fake retirement or something.

I think Jon popped again, but I could be wrong. I just don't think reporting him doing it again would be in their best interest.
Click to expand...
He’s still being tested.
 
kflo said:
That’s not an answer to the question.
Click to expand...

I suppose it's a policy to protect their reputation.

But reporting every failed test by their big names isn't good for business.

And as far as I know, there's new rules stating it doesn't have to be revealed?
 
Ah, so cute. The haters are it again so they can give each others likes.
 
kflo said:
He’s still being tested.
Click to expand...

Oh okay, well it's definitely possible he is not suspended and did not fail any test.

But I don't see why he's turning down huge money against Francis when Francis may lose the title before he gets a shot at him. I think the Francis fight is bigger money than any other HW.

Maybe he just doesn't feel comfortable with his body yet.
 
GaneHotBallsFinisher said:
I suppose it's a policy to protect their reputation.

But reporting every failed test by their big names isn't good for business.

And as far as I know, there's new rules stating it doesn't have to be revealed?
Click to expand...
All sanctions are reported.
 
genecop said:
Why would they hide that info?
Click to expand...
To give the fighter time to fight usada verdict. Because usada can sometimes be wrong like with Nate diaz and yoel Romero so fighters have a chance to prove their innocence before their rep gets destroyed forever
 
Hiding the suspension would be against the rules, if they were going to go that far they would have just thrown out the test and not suspend him.
 
kflo said:
That’s mostly spread by Jones haters.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see.

I'm not a Jones hater, but I've definitely wanted to see him lose. I mostly pull for underdogs.

I understand he has a definite case for GOAT, though. Would love to see him at HW and if he did well there, I don't think I could deny his GOAT status.
 
Superzorro said:
So you’re basing this on what exactly? Wishful thinking? If someone hasn’t fought in a while, chances are they have a suspension? Or just Jones?
Click to expand...
In general I agree but Jones is the one fighter who really got away with everything and has the most bulletproof UFC protection ever. Beginning from his drunk driving to the PED cases with crazy low "punishment" most of it screamed corruption. With anyone else I would have a hard time believing it but Jones kinda invites such ideas.
 
GaneHotBallsFinisher said:
Ah, I see.

I'm not a Jones hater, but I've definitely wanted to see him lose. I mostly pull for underdogs.

I understand he has a definite case for GOAT, though. Would love to see him at HW and if he did well there, I don't think I could deny his GOAT status.
Click to expand...

Of course they could, he is the most prolific drug cheat in mma history.

Few could convince themselves its just a coincidence.
 
kflo said:
Not a great idea for a public company to blatantly violate their public policies for the sole purpose or protecting a single athlete in private. And usada is a non profit on top of it.
Click to expand...

The UFC are a public company?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,179
Messages
57,972,770
Members
175,887
Latest member
kaneoconnor98

Share this page

Back
Top