I’m sure they are well educated in their respective fields, but I don’t believe for a moment that many (if any) of them have have actually witnessed serious fights between the two. Let alone the number of fights the big cat tamers have witnessed. It would be the equivalent of asking a physician to pick the winner of a fight between two humans. Hands on experience with real life accounts mean more (at least on this particular topic) than education. That is why I was so interested in their take when digging into the matter.
These are based on observations of confrontations between the animals in captivity, reserves, and historical records.
As for Beatty, his claims are based off of any number of variables that I don't know theres a lot of detailed info on. Were these Tigers fully grown males, born in captivity or the wild? Were they largely females that were killed, were the Tigers around a Pride of Lions and on their own when killed (in some cases they were btw)..?
There are variables and circumstances to this stuff..
For example the case of (Bobby and Caeser). Bobby (a Male Tiger) was set to fight Caeser (a Male Lion).. when the fight broke out initially, the Tiger easily took the Lion down and was holding it by the main and going for the throat. It also lacked for action so the director for the film asked Beatty to do something.. so he fucking sprays ammonia in the Tigers eyes causing Bobby to immediately release the Lion. When they stood up after that the Tiger was clearly fucked up from the ammonia and took a wild swipe at the Lion which left an opening for the Tiger to be killed.
And that's a documented example of one of his 'the Lion always wins'.
So, grain of salt is the word of the day there.
If you don’t trust Clyde Beatty’s estimation, look no further than virtually any other big cat tamer. I have yet to see one claim the tiger is the more fearsome fighter. Many of them have lost a substantial amount of money from lions killing their tigers. There may be a few tamers with opinions to the contrary, I just haven’t come across them while searching the topic.
No problem..
John Smith Clarke, a British lion tamer, said, in a lecture on the fight between a tiger and a lion given to the Glasgow Zoological Society, while showing the actual fight on the screen, "in 100 cases out of 100, the tiger would always beat the lion. It was far more agile, it was not so clumsy in its movements, it was equally strong, it was equally armed, but it fought in a different way. The tiger very often fought rolling on its back and held the lion in its grip until it defeated him."
^And he observed many of these encounters, they aren't based off of theories and so on.
Or how about a modern one form a conservationist who owns tons of these big cats and keeps them on a huge reservation in Africa and has seen plenty of encounters between them..
John Varty: "People always ask me which one is bigger? If a tiger and a lion had a fight, which one would win? Well, I've seen tigers crunch up a full-grown leopard tortoise like it was nothing. And lions try, but they just don't get it right. If there's a fight, the tiger will win, every time."
^Varty is super controversial in the Animal world, but he has the clout for these opinions because he owns many of them and keeps them in a semi natural habitat. I believe he answers with the tortoise shell instead of an actual fight because he's already frowned on by people in that world to some degree.. but there have been many encounters at his park with deaths involved. I believe at this point the cats are separated atm in the park, but with him you never know..
I admire both animals, maybe even with a preference for tigers. I just put more stock in the opinion of folks who have watched these animals engaged in mortal combat with each other rather than speculation from even well educated people.
I do as well. But I put stock in many sources, not just 1.
Not only that, but I've seen way too much evidence myself in filmed encounters where the Lions just get handled by the Tigers. Theres also far more reported incidents at Zoos/preserves over the decades of Tigers killing Lions more often than the other way around.
From the Romans, to people like Varty, Clarke, Beatty and many many more I've read up on this and have drawn my conclusions based on what I consider overwhelming evidence that full grown Male Tigers will win most encounters. I dig both animals, but for discussions sake I'm in the Tigers corner here..
..especially so if its a Siberian