- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 241
- Reaction score
- 2
By this logic, Conor is still less than Duffy because he got beat convincingly. He was around the same age as max (when max loss to him) when he loss to Duffy. Both improved since then, but he should still lose because he loss convincingly before. See how dumb that sounds?I'm telling you, I think that is wrong. They fought, Max lost convincingly.
Both have improved since. Doesn't change my opinion.