Ice Hockey, Rugby or American Football - Which team sport is the toughest?

Which team sport is the toughest?


  • Total voters
    88
Rugby.

It's nuts. You need the endurance of a soccer player, and the toughness and physicality of a medieval warrior. The punishment never ends. It's like that "hell week" shit that the military does, only it's for fun...allegedly.
 
Of the three I enjoy hockey the most but it Football hands down for being tougher.
 
All three are very physically demanding and punishing to the body at times, out of these 3 sports which is the toughest?



Eric Lindros suffered 4 more concussions and 2 leg injuries while trying to watch this
 
Last edited:
With or without padding?

They can take the hit however they choose, either way they're still gonna laying on the ground gasping for air and asking for the number of the Mack truck that just hit them, when they're able to form a coherent sentence again that is

No one that plays rugby at any level gets hit with full force bull rush of an elite NFL linebacker and those pads ain't gonna just magically make it feel like a night in a 5 star hotel
 
I'll go rugby but fuck playing any of those sports ha ha. Aussie Rules can be a tough game but it pales in comparison to rugby (league or union). It's no coincidence that most MMA fighters from Aus/NZ seem to have a rugby background, we generally don't wrestle here but I'd say rugby would have some transferable skills to grappling (and toughness of course).
 
Sorry for bringing back an old thread, but its an interesting topic.

If I had to pick one i'd go with rugby LEAGUE specifically, but I dont think theres really a simple answer and obviously people tend to get defensive and tribalistic about it usually based on whatever is the "tough" sport of choice where they live.

Hockey clearly has the highest POTENTIAL for brutality. When you take into account the skates, the sticks, the puck, the ice, the boards, the speed and obviously the lenience for straight up fist fighting in the middle of a game. But there is a big difference between the extreme end of what happens vs what the average player typically goes through in an average game, and overall hockey players are not taking the same level of consistent physical contact as rugby and American football players. If they were they wouldnt have the strength of schedule that they do because it'd leave you in a wheelchair before long. Another thing is overall they are a lot smaller than rugby and American football players and just generally not so much in the "freak athlete" vein because its more of a skill game. A big intimidating dude in hockey is just a regular dude in the others.

With American football theres is so much variation between positions that the kind of brutality you're gonna face is heavily dependent on that. A QB or kicker isnt getting much of anything compared to any position in rugby or hockey, but then if you're an RB or one of the linemen for example you're going to be dealing with explosive high impact shit on pretty much every play and fast tracking yourself to CTE. The hits are on average harder than rugby as well because the helmets and pads embolden players to just throw themselves headfirst into things at full speed. Theres also much more likelihood of getting blindside hit or just generally hit while in a shitty position.

Rugby Union the hits arent as hard but the contact is much more consistent and the threshold for getting hurt a lot lower due to the lack of helmets and pads. Its basically high speed team wrestling mixed in with a ball sport. Theres a gruelling, grinding. down in the trenches element to it that the others dont have to anywhere the same degree.

Rugby League the hits are often coming at higher speed than union and the game is easily the most relentlessly fast paced of the "big dudes fighting over an egg shaped ball" sports. Unlike union and even more so American football, there is barely any downtime. Its pretty much run full speed into a wall of players, get put on your ass, get up, roll ball back, repeat, for 80 mins. The amount of tackles made etc in one game is ridiculous.
 
Oh and something I think you have to give hockey credit for, is that it strikes more of a balance between grace and violence than the other sports do. I mean alongside soccer and basketball its probably the most high skilled and aesthetically pleasing major team sport, but then unlike those two its also a pretty brutal sport with big hits and fights. Football and rugby union are very messy, ugly, complex games, and although of course there is still a skill element, they lean a lot more into raw physical attributes (size, strength, speed etc) and brute force than hockey.
 
So bring up Volk as a rugby player...there are NFL players literally TWICE his size that are faster too. LMAO
 
Speed kills. Getting hit by a guy skating as fast as he can is going to deliver a lot bigger impact. Your head will also bounce off the plexi glass or the boards or the ice.
 
So bring up Volk as a rugby player...there are NFL players literally TWICE his size that are faster too. LMAO

I believe he played front row, he weighed a lot more then but still was very short compared to the usual players in that position. I think that proves how tough Volk is
 
Hockey for sure. Not only are you getting trucked by people flying on skates... You have the added danger of getting fucked up by a sharp skate, a stick, or a puck.

Its like you get into hockey with the expectation of losing half your teeth but the time you retire.
 
Sorry for bringing back an old thread, but its an interesting topic.

If I had to pick one i'd go with rugby LEAGUE specifically, but I dont think theres really a simple answer and obviously people tend to get defensive and tribalistic about it usually based on whatever is the "tough" sport of choice where they live.

Hockey clearly has the highest POTENTIAL for brutality. When you take into account the skates, the sticks, the puck, the ice, the boards, the speed and obviously the lenience for straight up fist fighting in the middle of a game. But there is a big difference between the extreme end of what happens vs what the average player typically goes through in an average game, and overall hockey players are not taking the same level of consistent physical contact as rugby and American football players. If they were they wouldnt have the strength of schedule that they do because it'd leave you in a wheelchair before long. Another thing is overall they are a lot smaller than rugby and American football players and just generally not so much in the "freak athlete" vein because its more of a skill game. A big intimidating dude in hockey is just a regular dude in the others.

With American football theres is so much variation between positions that the kind of brutality you're gonna face is heavily dependent on that. A QB or kicker isnt getting much of anything compared to any position in rugby or hockey, but then if you're an RB or one of the linemen for example you're going to be dealing with explosive high impact shit on pretty much every play and fast tracking yourself to CTE. The hits are on average harder than rugby as well because the helmets and pads embolden players to just throw themselves headfirst into things at full speed. Theres also much more likelihood of getting blindside hit or just generally hit while in a shitty position.

Rugby Union the hits arent as hard but the contact is much more consistent and the threshold for getting hurt a lot lower due to the lack of helmets and pads. Its basically high speed team wrestling mixed in with a ball sport. Theres a gruelling, grinding. down in the trenches element to it that the others dont have to anywhere the same degree.

Rugby League the hits are often coming at higher speed than union and the game is easily the most relentlessly fast paced of the "big dudes fighting over an egg shaped ball" sports. Unlike union and even more so American football, there is barely any downtime. Its pretty much run full speed into a wall of players, get put on your ass, get up, roll ball back, repeat, for 80 mins. The amount of tackles made etc in one game is ridiculous.

Very well said.
 
Oh and something I think you have to give hockey credit for, is that it strikes more of a balance between grace and violence than the other sports do. I mean alongside soccer and basketball its probably the most high skilled and aesthetically pleasing major team sport, but then unlike those two its also a pretty brutal sport with big hits and fights. Football and rugby union are very messy, ugly, complex games, and although of course there is still a skill element, they lean a lot more into raw physical attributes (size, strength, speed etc) and brute force than hockey.

Another great insight.
 
I'm not really a fan of it but based on the carnage it seems to cause on the bodies of the players I'd probably go with NFL.

I think rugby demands more all round cardio etc but if you're talking purely which sport is tougher on your body then yeah, NFL for me.
 
So bring up Volk as a rugby player...there are NFL players literally TWICE his size that are faster too. LMAO
lol faster for what 4 seconds and then rugby player takes over. rugby is lot tougher no breaks no oxygen masks no padding no maxy pads they pants look like they have some pad there lol. nothing interesting about nfl. if rugby players would hit each other head to head they would have as many cte as nfl but they are not dumb so they hit each other clean and powerfull so somebody having cte means nothing
 
I confess read the first page but that was it.

The thing about football is we have a huge differences in the size of the athletes involved. A big 240 pound runnng back vs a 190 pound cornerback, a 290 pound defensive tackle vs a bloucking back at 210, that same 290 pounder vs a 215 pound QB. We dont see that kind of size difference in rugby/hockey. That 290 pounder hitting a QB just standing there.....ouch~~~~~

Then we have that speed difference, TONS of pro footballers were college sprinters, long jumpers, hurdles the NFL has x Olympic athletes out there which means another level of......velocity.

There really is no doubt that football is the toughest sport, it is the only sport we find 300 pounders vs 190m pounders, 10.10 sprinters are not in rugby or hockey,

Think of a punt or kickout where these guys are coming from a distance to hit, think of the size/velocity they hit with,

I played 4 seasons of high school football, just high school.....extremely violent, you take a beating. While never playing hockey or rugby I have watched it, we see a lot of standing around in rugby and smaller/slower athletes in general. Hockey has no huge players.

Big fast and mean athletes in the NFL

Visited a site talking most dangerous sports, Football at number three, MMA two, Boxing number one, that will work.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top