- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 43,596
- Reaction score
- 67,104
yes, with the asterisk that this agreement is valid as long as the local leadership has shown will and ability to contain and pacify the protests.Sure, can we agree that escalating to the user of military force to contain a protest is less than ideal?
yes, with the caveat above.And that civil police under state and local officials should exhaust their options before the president escalates to the use of soldiers?
from afar it looks like even though the local police may be willing to contain the riots, the signals from the political leaders go from timid to almost support for the protests. you cannot have a functioning local police 100% committed to the job as long as the hierarchy isn't there 100%.
leaders throughout history brought around outside legions to stomp on local protests when they were not confident the locals we doing the job. and in this case its not that the LA cops can't do it, but it's about the local politicians offering Trump on a platter the opportunity to claim political casus belli.
so it's a lot of shit going on:
- local politicians not having the backs of the law enforcement
- credible info about potential foreign money involved
- LA politicians looking from either weak and hysterical to outright treasonous
- opportunity for a sly politician like Trump to play savior, because i'd bet most of the country doesn't agree with mexican flag waving dudes setting cars on fire as a solid direction for america.
etc etc