I feel like the UFC likes controversial decisions

Bearknuckle

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
10,760
Reaction score
10,526
It keeps people arguing and tuning in and being emotionally invested in what would’ve been a fight not many cared about. Myself included.

Controversial decisions are very common, to the point you can see it pop up in nearly every event that we’ve gotten use to it.
 
It keeps people arguing and tuning in and being emotionally invested in what would’ve been a fight not many cared about. Myself included.

Controversial decisions are very common, to the point you can see it pop up in nearly every event that we’ve gotten use to it.
The controversial decisions are all part of the storyline now that UFC AND WWE have merged!
 
This is how I answer your thread sir!

eff9813b-8067-425a-9911-ddcfc848f96f_text.gif
 
I'm not sure if this is true. With the 3 rounders bad decisions mean the wrong people get elevated. With 5 rounders that devolves into rematches. Close fights that could go either way tend to be good fights but I don't think they like the controversy per say.
 
They seem to have gotten way worse in the past year or so but maybe that's just me. Ik the scoring criteria changed but not sure exactly when and who knows if all the judges are knowledgeable on the criteria. Seems way more all over the place now. 1 judge scoring a fight 30-27 one way and the other scoring it 30-27 the other. With the way that judge scored rd 5 a 10-8 for Grasso I could see 1 judge scoring a fight 30-27 for one fighter and another judge scoring it 30-26 for the other lol
 
They seem to have gotten way worse in the past year or so but maybe that's just me.

I think it only seems like that because we're seeing more fights on more cards. We have a fight card almost every week in the UFC and now other organizations are putting on more cards. The 10pt, round by round system came from boxing. The average boxing match has many more rounds to make up for badly scored ones and they still have tons of shitty decisions. So it's to be expected in 3 or 5 round fights.
 
Decisions are good for the ufc period. Leaves a margin for human error to exploit, wink wink



"Out of chaos comes order" they say (the elite)










A good magician uses slight of hand to fool the public
 


Eat it, and choke on it..

This is an amazing day. How do you not like that Draw???

LMAO.

IMMEDIATE excuses.
 
I think the 3-5 round model fits controversial decisions, boxing isnt free but at least they have 12 rounds so 1 round doesnt turn a fight into a draw.
 
Think they just make the best of the cards handed to them. Pretty sure they believe they know who will win and have favorites on whom they want to win and don't like to put certain fighters in those situations to begin with if they won't play ball, but controversial decisions happen during the card, not before the card, unless you are thinking they like to spin the narrative into rematches that may sell. Think they like decisive wins and losses.
 
controversy is something that keeps people talking so yeah I’m sure they don’t mind it though they won’t admit it.
 
I think the 3-5 round model fits controversial decisions, boxing isnt free but at least they have 12 rounds so 1 round doesnt turn a fight into a draw.
How many rounds could MMA athletes realistically be expected to fight? Would they have to be shorter rounds?
 
I'm not sure if this is true. With the 3 rounders bad decisions mean the wrong people get elevated. With 5 rounders that devolves into rematches. Close fights that could go either way tend to be good fights but I don't think they like the controversy per say.
It's per se. Not per say.
 
Back
Top