• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Hugh Jackman denies steroid use for Wolverine

Wolverines body is possible natural if you’re lean and have a professional team of people to get the leading exactly right for every shot. I’ve seen pictures of him at the beach and shit like that around this time and that body is definitely reachable. It is not maintainable, but you could definitely hit that for two or three months if you really wanted to.
 
Wolverines body is possible natural if you’re lean and have a professional team of people to get the leading exactly right for every shot. I’ve seen pictures of him at the beach and shit like that around this time and that body is definitely reachable. It is not maintainable, but you could definitely hit that for two or three months if you really wanted to.

*product is intended for 17-41yo males.. :)
 
*product is intended for 17-41yo males.. :)
I’m 43 and could do it again but last cut I did to 200ish cost me more strength than my ego could handle. 217 now as of last night. I’ll do no carbs and lots of cardio this coming month. Probably 5 pounds water and 5 pounds fat. That’s about 15% body fat. I don’t think 10 is even worth pursuing but for 30 million I’ll get down to 7-8
 
Jackman definitely could be natty. I'm a nobody and here's me this afternoon at age 49 full natty, married with kids and I work a fulltime desk job. This is my steady state dad bod lifting 2 x week with BJJ 3 x week without training for physique or being disciplined with diet. 5' 8.5" @ 172 lbs. If I had to spend 6 months training only for physique for a big payday, I could get hella more jacked while still being natty.

Could Jackman be on the sauce? Yes. But is it possible he's natty? Absolutely.


dad bod pic.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jackman definitely could be natty. I'm a nobody and here's me this afternoon at age 49 full natty, married with kids and I work a fulltime desk job. This is my steady state dad bod lifting 2 x week with BJJ 3 x week without even training for physique or being disciplined with diet. 5' 8.5" @ 172 lbs. If I had to spend 6 months training only for physique for a big payday, I could get hella more jacked while still being natty.

Could Jackman be on the sauce? Yes. But is it possible he's natty? Absolutely.


View attachment 969544


You've got better arms than clearly natural X Men 1 Jackman, although his chest and shoulders seem to take yours out. He ends up looking a whole reality different to this version though (while around a decade older).
06164bab7194ccf91924718fb3cd18ff04-23-x-men-hugh-jackman.2x.rsquare.w330.jpg
 
Hugh is on PEDS. He needs to stop with the nonsense.
 
You've got better arms than clearly natural X Men 1 Jackman, although his chest and shoulders seem to take yours out. He ends up looking a whole reality different to this version though (while around a decade older).
06164bab7194ccf91924718fb3cd18ff04-23-x-men-hugh-jackman.2x.rsquare.w330.jpg

IIRC someone noted Jackman only got a few weeks notice for the first X-men movie. He looks like a regular gym bro who's kind of in shape, but isn't prepped for anything special and just got told to come in today and take a shirtless pic. Like my pic above. Except I'm 49 and he was 31 in the first X-men movie.

Being older doesn't mean your physique has to suck. I've had pretty much the same build since early 20's. I mean anyone who's trained many years natty knows your explosion, recovery and gastank by late 40's are for shit compared to 20's but as far as building muscle and looking ripped, everything works the same. My steady state weight is around 170 but just to change up my training, I've been as low as 152 and as high as 190 over the years but neither extreme is sustainable for me. 150's I'm a lot more ripped but have to shed muscle to get there. High 180's I'm a lot bigger and stronger but also higher bf. The biggest and strongest I've been were age 40 and again at age 46 (during COVID lockdowns) when I switched to powerlifting focus. Putting on muscle or shedding fat is readily doable in your 40's natty. It's about consistency and training discipline.

The other aspect that makes Jackman believable are his proportions. He's been cited as 185 lbs in the later X-men movies most recently Logan at age 49. At 6' 3" that's downright skinny and it's evident in full body shots:

Hugh-Jackman-reveals-his-thoughts-on-Marvel-Cinematic-Universe-rebooting-Wolverine.jpg


What's impressive is his leanness. If he was 240 lbs that lean, I'd call BS. Definitely took discipline but possible natty at his size. Honestly if that's his best superhero physique on gear, he should be ashamed of himself.
 
Last edited:


Chael states that it's plausible for people to not know they are juicing.

The example he used was a wrestler from Turkey. After each training session, his coach would massage his shoulder with a cream. He assumed it was something like Icy Hot or Tiger Balm. But, it was a topical steroid.

I am sure many in Hollywood ensure there is a level of plausible deniability in the diet/topicals their trainers give them.
 
In general you look at the shoulders and traps. You can't build that 3d delt quickly without help. It doesn't matter how good your diet is or how hard you train. It is one of those body parts that takes time to build. He did all of that within a span of 2-3 years. He didn't even know how to warmup for working out by the time he was in his 30s. It is safe to say he is somewhat of a noob in his 30s.

It's movies though. They have makeup artists and angles to help. This is him now. If he shows up swole for the deadpool movie then he is faking the funk. I don't care who you are. You aren't building muscle quickly in your mid 50s



This was him last summer, I think he just always stays in shape now.

61205487-11094543-Wow_The_Greatest_Showman_actor_topped_up_his_tan_wearing_just_lo-a-121_1660034773879.jpg
 
This was him last summer, I think he just always stays in shape now.

61205487-11094543-Wow_The_Greatest_Showman_actor_topped_up_his_tan_wearing_just_lo-a-121_1660034773879.jpg
I think he is trolling a little in his newer instagram photos. He isn't as big as he used to be but they are using photography tricks for him. They are using some sort of wide or fish eye lens for his photos. He might be really 190 now. People on the post are talking about how he is 190 lbs. That is 190 lbs after bulking and going on a food and water cut. That is where it gets sketchy. He does it really fast at his age.
 
Guys, lets put this debate to rest.

In this pic, he's 30 years old, right before he's cast as Wolverine.

90112c0e-3fbf-4ef4-aaa7-dd2a24c55a4c-jpeg.962852


He's not exactly Yoel Romero.

Now look at these pics when he's in his mid 40s.

OIP.sxEYThAiNCRxFB6cSSgfhQHaGL

R.405f98d9dabf7ed5ed10d1f807a07abb

Who here believes he got so jacked, working out off-and-on for roles over the course of 10 years, and its been decumented he went long stretches without serious workouts to maintain his physique in-between roles as Wolverine? And into his mid-40s?

Now I know all the tricks to look leaner with popped-out veins, like all the strategies used by bodybuilders before competitions, but that's just plain insane to believe he wasn't on any kind of steroid or HGH.

100% certain he was on some kind of juice.
 
My own stepson could play wolverine without roids. I couldn't, I would need all the gear. My step son is naturally muscular like his father and grandfather. They're both criminal pieces of shit, but at least they passed down their physique. His chest is his weakest body part but his arms, back and quads just balloon up when he's lifting and eating a lot.
My point is, people have wondered if he was on roids. If he was famous for playing wolverine, most people would be saying "lol at this guy saying he's natural".

I'm not saying that Jackman did or did not take gear. He's a naturally slim guy so he might have had to. However, that physique is attainable naturally. The most impressive part is not his size but his conditioning. He's tanned, shredded, perfect lighting and probably pumped up before each shirtless scene. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors involved.
 
Guys, lets put this debate to rest.

In this pic, he's 30 years old, right before he's cast as Wolverine.

90112c0e-3fbf-4ef4-aaa7-dd2a24c55a4c-jpeg.962852


He's not exactly Yoel Romero.

Now look at these pics when he's in his mid 40s.

OIP.sxEYThAiNCRxFB6cSSgfhQHaGL

R.405f98d9dabf7ed5ed10d1f807a07abb

Who here believes he got so jacked, working out off-and-on for roles over the course of 10 years, and its been decumented he went long stretches without serious workouts to maintain his physique in-between roles as Wolverine? And into his mid-40s?

Now I know all the tricks to look leaner with popped-out veins, like all the strategies used by bodybuilders before competitions, but that's just plain insane to believe he wasn't on any kind of steroid or HGH.

100% certain he was on some kind of juice.

Of course he's on juice. These threads are always the same. The people who know it's obvious come out and make it clear how obvious it is. Then you have the other people who come in and try and convince everyone else it's possible. They did the same shit with that that liver king guy.
 
IIRC someone noted Jackman only got a few weeks notice for the first X-men movie. He looks like a regular gym bro who's kind of in shape, but isn't prepped for anything special and just got told to come in today and take a shirtless pic. Like my pic above. Except I'm 49 and he was 31 in the first X-men movie.

Being older doesn't mean your physique has to suck. I've had pretty much the same build since early 20's. I mean anyone who's trained many years natty knows your explosion, recovery and gastank by late 40's are for shit compared to 20's but as far as building muscle and looking ripped, everything works the same. My steady state weight is around 170 but just to change up my training, I've been as low as 152 and as high as 190 over the years but neither extreme is sustainable for me. 150's I'm a lot more ripped but have to shed muscle to get there. High 180's I'm a lot bigger and stronger but also higher bf. The biggest and strongest I've been were age 40 and again at age 46 (during COVID lockdowns) when I switched to powerlifting focus. Putting on muscle or shedding fat is readily doable in your 40's natty. It's about consistency and training discipline.

The other aspect that makes Jackman believable are his proportions. He's been cited as 185 lbs in the later X-men movies most recently Logan at age 49. At 6' 3" that's downright skinny and it's evident in full body shots:

Hugh-Jackman-reveals-his-thoughts-on-Marvel-Cinematic-Universe-rebooting-Wolverine.jpg


What's impressive is his leanness. If he was 240 lbs that lean, I'd call BS. Definitely took discipline but possible natty at his size. Honestly if that's his best superhero physique on gear, he should be ashamed of himself.
It’s not his physique or mass that’s the give away. It’s the monster veins and the dried out skin. He might not have used to get bug, but if I was a betting man I would guess that he’s used some weaker roids to keep his mass up and growing while he dieted hard. He also definitely took some diuretic or something
 
Of course he's on juice. These threads are always the same. The people who know it's obvious come out and make it clear how obvious it is. Then you have the other people who come in and try and convince everyone else it's possible. They did the same shit with that that liver king guy.

He should change his named to Hughe Jacked-Man.
 
Back
Top