I've gotta say, you've really got something here.
My shoveling has never had so much power as it does after watching this.
Patterson and Tyson were VERY similar and pretty much both grew up with the peekaboo style I think Torres found D'Amato much later in his career but I haven't seen much of him tbh. Both Tyson and Patterson were small HWs so surely a boxer who is big for his divison would fight slightly different but what's described in the article is pretty textbook peekaboo style. Patterson, Tyson, Povetkin when he got trained by Atlas they all use(d) those techniques
I really doubt the "textbook" part of this article considering he basically cross stitched it from interviews and just watching Tyson (who was already a extremely gifted guy in the first place with his speed and power). And i also take issue with the authenticity given that the author isnt a guy from the lineage attempting to elaborate a system by just watching its most notable practitioner. But whatever, it is not my race.
Nuke, this guy is so stupid that the level of logic you're trying to push just isn't being received.
Come...
Joke with us.
I really doubt the "textbook" part of this article considering he basically cross stitched it from interviews and just watching Tyson (who was already a extremely gifted guy in the first place with his speed and power).
Nobody claims it is a "textbook"
Any suggestion on a different method of analysis, apart from "cross stitched it from interviews and just watching Tyson"?
I would like to visit Catskill, talk to Rooney or even better talk to Tyson, but at the moment it is not possible.
I wasn't talking to you.
And I already outlined in my previous replies on why I had issues with your articles. There's no need to rehash it.
You were talking about me, no?
You can keep them to yourself. I was asking for constructive criticism. You and your boddy only point problems, but do not provide anything usefull. One can find shit or prescribe shit to anything, no special skills required
It really is a bullshit complaint. Regardless of the validity of the article, it says "how to box like Mike Tyson" and not "how to master the peak-a-boo" style so crying over the fact that the peek-a-boo is tailored for every boxer is completely needless.
You were talking about me, no?
You can keep them to yourself. I was asking for constructive criticism. You and your boddy only point problems, but do not provide anything usefull. One can find shit or prescribe shit to anything, no special skills required
No.Hello,
I would like to expose my series "The Science of Mike Tyson and Elements of Peek-A-Boo" to your constructive criticism.
Like people who understand the importance of education and its role in conveying your ideasI know some people complain about grammar and typos,
Yes, because picture books are for people who can't read. Or the people who order Taco Bell by shouting the number adjacent to the picture of the thing that looks the most appetizing.but our blog is more about pictures and the message.
And your descriptions are both basic and sketchy, but "reading between the lines"... I would change that to "reading another source"We always encourage the readers to read between the lines and go on their own beyond our basic sketchy descriptions.
... consistent in your approach I see.We plan 10-15 article in total, covering all major aspects of this style!Our goal is not to produce a guide like @ expertboxing (10 steps to this shit, 20 types of this crap),
Part fucking 1 isn't done? Jesus.Part I (Intro) - still WIP
I actually took the time to read this. It's much worse than I thought.
BUT DON'T SAY ANYTHING BAD, because you're wrong.
Like people who understand the importance of education and its role in conveying your ideas
Yes, because picture books are for people who can't read. Or the people who order Taco Bell by shouting the number adjacent to the picture of the thing that looks the most appetizing.
And your descriptions are both basic and sketchy, but "reading between the lines"... I would change that to "reading another source"
... consistent in your approach I see.
Part fucking 1 isn't done? Jesus.
I've never Salsa danced with a shovel before.
Lastly, your gifs are racist. Why's it gotta be the black guy doing peek-a-boo?
I'm here apizur, i'm here....
I really doubt the "textbook" part of this article considering he basically cross stitched it from interviews and just watching Tyson (who was already a extremely gifted guy in the first place with his speed and power). And i also take issue with the authenticity given that the author isnt a guy from the lineage attempting to elaborate a system by just watching its most notable practitioner. But whatever, it is not my race.
Nuclear and Apizur you guys are acting like children. Why the big thorn in your side?