- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 50,893
- Reaction score
- 43,154
One (T)KO from Strickland since 2020 doesn't really leave me confident that DDP is taking a mat nap
Wait so Imavov had the full camp and Strickland was on short notice yet Sean had the advantage?
Where in Strickland's style do you possibly see less cardio being good for him? Strickland doesn't need extra size, nobody overpowers him at MW anyway.
Strickland was quite literally chubby and had been stress eating during Christmas after losing to Cannonier.Strickland is arguably the best cardio point fighter in the sport, certainly in the point kickboxing variety, and remains in shape year long.
Imavov was booked at middleweight against short, compact wrestle boxer Kelvin. So he prepared for a totally different fight in a totally different weight division. He also obviously had to diet and start his water loading because this was on 5 days notice. Strickland got to walk in unencumbered with dieting or weight management. The fight was at light heavyweight because obviously only Imavov was the size of making weight, Strickland was too big.
Feel free to listen to anyone from RVCA (e.g. Bisping) and they will all tell you the same Strickland does - he is in full fight shape year round. He isn't married, has no kids, I'm not sure if the guy even has hobbies. He's lived a spartan lifestyle with cardio and training being his only activity.
For what its worth, obviously he was too big to make middleweight and Imavov was not (this was booked literally on fight week) so of course Strickland was bigger.
Strickland is a cardio point kick boxer. Forcing someone expecting to fight a short, compact wrestle boxer Kelvin at 185lbs, then having to go 5 rounds with him at Light Heavyweight is a massive, massive advantage to Strickland.
This part is subjective and you're just making up a scenario and deciding how it would go. I'm simply stating the real world circumstances that disadvantaged Imavov.
I would likely pick Strickland to beat him again via decision in a brutally boring 5 round jab/teep fight. However Imavov would have a better overall chance.
What rematch?After Sean wins the belt back, this rematch will be sick
1. You say Imavov was at a disadvantage because he was preparing for a main event against Gastelum?
- Who was Strickland preparing for when he accepted the fight against Imavov on 5 days notice?
2. You claim Imavov would do better against Strickland with a FULL camp?
- Not only is that subjective but it’s a bit nonsensical.
Regardless the only facts we have is that Strickland was banged up coming off a recent hard fought L to Cannonier when he picked up the phone and agreed to fight Imavov, he then proceeded to beat him up with relative ease in a lopsided fight.
I really think you’re selling Strickland short brother… there’s no need to make excuses for Imavov who’s clearly inferior to Strickland.
Strickland was quite literally chubby and had been stress eating during Christmas after losing to Cannonier.
That was the one and only time Strickland gassed hard at Middleweight.
It hasn't. Strickland weighed 25 lbs more than Imamov in the cage IIRC and Strickland has jab/teep defensive style which actually requires preparation to solve. Imamov had none.
Rewatch the fight. He just leaned on Imamov and was able to absorb everything Imamov through b/c he was a backstreet boy heavier.
Here's a question, how poorly has Strickland's win over Izzy aged? You asked the wrong one homey.
I think what Sean did was more impressive, he didn't have a camp. The fight wasn't close.Without context this is really wack.
Imavov had a full fight camp for 185lbs and ended up getting Strickland on 5 days notice and forced to fight at light heavyweight. So he had to diet and start his fight week preparations for middleweight and Sean had zero of that.
It was also his first ever 5 round fight.
I think what Sean did was more impressive, he didn't have a camp. The fight wasn't close.