• Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to its more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Opinion History will not be kind to Joe Biden

LBJ was probably the last time this happened. His record is complicated insofar as on the one hand, he oversaw amazing things like the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Clean Air Act, the creation of Medicare and Medicaid…
But he was also the Vietnam War President, and that of course caused very low popularity, so LBJ opted not to run again.

LBJ I think was in pretty poor health too, so he probably just wanted to live out his last few years on his ranch.
 
So these network news sources you speak of, like ABC or NBC, are highly accurate news sources that may lean *slightly* left
LOL, that's all I really need to know from you. One of those companies just settled for $15 million dollars for being lying partisan hacks.

You're simply not living in reality. Enjoy making these types of "It's the people's fault for not accepting Democrat propaganda" excuses for the next 12 or so years. You apparently don't want to learn any lessons, and have your feet firmly planted in quicksand. Have fun watching the Democrats sink into obscurity, and be sure to act confused as to why it's happening every election cycle for the foreseeable future. You got some rough times ahead, unless you take your head out of the sand.
 
LOL, that's all I really need to know from you. One of those companies just settled for $15 million dollars for being lying partisan hacks.

You're simply not living in reality. Enjoy making these types of "It's the people's fault for not accepting Democrat propaganda" excuses for the next 12 or so years. You apparently don't want to learn any lessons, and have your feet firmly planted in quicksand. Have fun watching the Democrats sink into obscurity, and be sure to act confused as to why it's happening every election cycle for the foreseeable future. You got some rough times ahead, unless you take your head out of the sand.
I don’t think the democrats will sink into obscurity. They’ll ditch the woke bullshit and gain back favor after the republicans piss off half the country over the next 4 years.
 
Reality seems like propaganda to people who have been propagandized
At the very least, those of us crazies who choose not to spread propaganda here are being put in our place by those responsible for spreading it
 
I don’t think the democrats will sink into obscurity. They’ll ditch the woke bullshit
I have my doubts about that. There are too many people in their midst that are all in on it. It goes deeper than just a pandering message they can rearrange. They have to clean house with their people, which is not easy to do when the people are elected officials. All they can do is primary the shit out of the woke crowd, and hope for the best.

As for Republicans getting people to turn on them, it will take a LOT after four years of this borderline, if not outright treasonous regime. Not to mention that their media propagandists are now being ignored. There's a whole lot of stank the Dems have wash off, before they're considered the lesser of two evils again. I mean, the entire country shifted right. New York is basically in play now, and I don't think Cali will be far behind. The gains Republicans made in those uber Liberal strongholds tells the story of just how pissed people are at Democrats.
 
I have my doubts about that. There are too many people in their midst that are all in on it. It goes deeper than just a pandering message they can rearrange. They have to clean house with their people, which is not easy to do when the people are elected officials. All they can do is primary the shit out of the woke crowd, and hope for the best.

As for Republicans getting people to turn on them, it will take a LOT after four years of this borderline, if not outright treasonous regime. Not to mention that their media propagandists are now being ignored. There's a whole lot of stank the Dems have wash off, before they're considered the lesser of two evils again. I mean, the entire country shifted right. New York is basically in play now, and I don't think Cali will be far behind. The gains Republicans made in those uber Liberal strongholds tells the story of just how pissed people are at Democrats.
We’ve seen how fickle people are. If Trump’s term sucks they can win again
 
If his record was so good (lol) then the optics wouldn’t have mattered.
Out of all the developed countries, which ones performed better economically than the US post-Covid? In other words, are there any other leaders whose records you would have taken over Biden's.
 
Why? It doesn’t just have to be true, people have to know that it’s true—and they didn’t.
Some of that can be blamed on messaging failures on our part. We should’ve done a better job communicating our successes, but also being honest about the work that was still ahead.

But also we have wayyy lost the media/messaging war with the Right. They have a zillion podcasts and YouTube channels that are pretty far reaching, and even TV networks like FOX do way better ratings than left leaning networks.

I saw Republicans TV ads and things. They did a pretty good job painting the picture that America is iN ChAoS despite the fact that Biden was already on track to deport more people than Trump did even before his executive orders on the border, crime is down nationally, border encounters are way down, unemployment is low, stock markets high, wages are up, inflation is down, we were much more fiscally responsible.

But people by and large are not well informed politically. People seem to think I sound like an elitist asshole when I say that, but it’s true.

There's an episode of the Simpsons from way back that pretty accurately depicted what happened in this election.

Homer runs for Sanitation Commissioner making a bunch of bombastic and unrealistic promises. His competent, yet low key opponent calmly points this out and still loses in a landslide. Homer runs the department into the ground, and hilarity ensues.

Although watching Trump do the same will probably be less hilarious.

 
LOL, that's all I really need to know from you. One of those companies just settled for $15 million dollars for being lying partisan hacks.

You're simply not living in reality. Enjoy making these types of "It's the people's fault for not accepting Democrat propaganda" excuses for the next 12 or so years. You apparently don't want to learn any lessons, and have your feet firmly planted in quicksand. Have fun watching the Democrats sink into obscurity, and be sure to act confused as to why it's happening every election cycle for the foreseeable future. You got some rough times ahead, unless you take your head out of the sand.
Here is the MediaBiasFact Check for ABC News and NBC News, and it’s just as I said: slightly left leaning, highly accurate.


But seeing this won’t change your view, for the exact reasons I described earlier: you’ve been conditioned to distrust anything outside your bubble.
I don’t need LiBeRaL ProPaGaNdA to tell me whether Biden did well; I can look up actual data on what the unemployment rate was and is, jobs added and what kind they were, how much we added to the debt vs Trump (answer: a whooole lot less), the effects of our legislation on real people and communities—all kinds of stuff.

This $15 million judgment had nothing to do with ABC’s actual reporting, it had to do with a factually incorrect statement that one person chose to make.

Compare that to FOX’s 900 billion dollar settlement with Dominion. Internal documents proved that FOX knew all of their fraud allegations were nonsense, but ran the stories anyway because they got better ratings when they did <lol>
Do you think their ratings have suffered bigly for this? Fuck no, I doubt their viewers even know it happened because they’re soo poorly informed.

And I did learn lessons from the 2024 election. The Republicans showed me that you can win on the same exact platform that lost 4 years prior without changing a thing. You can even run a historically unpopular candidate, even one with felony charges and convictions, as long as you control messaging. Your opponent doesn’t even have to be doing a shitty job, you just need to convince people that they’re doing a shitty job. Duly noted.
 
Last edited:
Were these studies done by conservatives or liberals or is it a mix like with those batshit crazy historians you mentioned earlier?
Now historians are batshit crazy? Because they say Trump sucks? You guys already loathe higher education, you loathe fact checking, and now historians..
<mma4>
 
We’ve seen how fickle people are. If Trump’s term sucks they can win again
Trump was already POTUS and we were told we were ruled by Hitler Jr over the next 4 years, even though the majority of us knew that was bs.

The perception of his term will always suck for certain people and the news outlets they trust.
 
Now historians are batshit crazy? Because they say Trump sucks? You guys already loathe higher education, you loathe fact checking, and now historians..
<mma4>
Nah. I have a 4 year degree plus 7 years postgraduate. Try that elsewhere
 
Here is the MediaBiasFact Check for ABC News and NBC News, and it’s just as I said: slightly left leaning, highly accurate.
Oh', I guess that means it's true. We all know how accurate fact checkers are. Before they came around, facts didn't even exist...

You really can't think for yourself, can you? It's truly amazing at how much you appeal to authority on basically everything. Biden is good because "historians" say so. Twitter is a right wing hellscape because "studies" told you so. ABC and NBC are "highly accurate" because "fact checkers" said so.

You literally have no thoughts of your own. Keep following the rest of the lemmings off the cliff, bro. It's really working out for you lately. LOL.
 
This $15 million judgment had nothing to do with ABC’s actual reporting, it had to do with a factually incorrect statement that one person chose to make.
So a person lied on ABC? Did ABC retract that statement? Did the person face any consequences publicly for lying?
 
No just the ones you refered to saying Biden will be looked at favorably. They can have their opinion as "historians" I can have my opinion too.
Of course you can have your own opinion—it just isn’t likely to be as correct on the topic of history as 150 historians. I mean, it’d be one thing if you thought Trump was top 10 and they said top 15. But when the average of 150 historians is to put him in dead last all time, and your opinion is nowhere near that, it might be time to reconsider your opinion.

Oh', I guess that means it's true. We all know how accurate fact checkers are. Before they came around, facts didn't even exist...

You really can't think for yourself, can you? It's truly amazing at how much you appeal to authority on basically everything. Biden is good because "historians" say so. Twitter is a right wing hellscape because "studies" told you so. ABC and NBC are "highly accurate" because "fact checkers" said so.

You literally have no thoughts of your own. Keep following the rest of the lemmings off the cliff, bro. It's really working out for you lately. LOL.
You couldn’t have proven my point better than this. It doesn’t matter how much data I provide, it doesn’t matter how much supporting evidence I share, none of it will ever matter to you because “feelings.”

And btw, it’s only an appeal to authority fallacy if that constitutes the sole evidence. So no: Biden isn’t only good because “historians say so.” I’ve provided facts and sources that go over his achievements, the real impact on those policies on unemployment, jobs, wages, government and corporate investment, all kinds of stuff. That is actual data, not an appeal to authority fallacy.
Likewise, fact checks should be a jumping off point to do one’s own research. It is possible to verify or disprove what fact checkers say.

But none of this matters to you. You operate off of emotions and feelings, and don’t even see the irony of accusing me of not thinking for myself when I’m the one evaluating multiple pieces of data and you are not.
Carry on…
 
Back
Top