Social Hillary Clinton:social media companies must censor people's content or else we lose total control.

[Richmma80]

There is no conspiracy theory. Look up Elvis Chan FBI and start reading. It's terrible.

You also want to talk about Hunter's Laptop and what they did with that?

Is that your cousin at the trailer park?

I swear you Drumpftards will believe anything

 

[ChosenOne]

Why are the handles blanked out though?

Makes me think it's fake, as there is no way to go on this person's "profile" and confirm the validity of it

Elon Musk Deems ‘Cis’ A Twitter Slur–Here’s Why It’s Is So Polarizing​

Elon Musk has deemed the words “cis” and “cisgender” slurs on Twitter and warned that anyone who harasses others on Twitter will receive at least temporary suspension. The warning came after a Twitter user complained others had labeled him “cis .” Here’s what the word means and why it has become so polarizing....

 

[ChosenOne]

Also, Trumps Truth Social, had more rules restricting free speech and more bans (mostly of left leaning content) then Twitter did, pre Musk.

...Truth Social was found to shadowban liberal and progressive users that disagree with the site's narrative, as well as a swathe of other content, including some conservative content. Truth Social has banned content mentioning abortion and the January 6 hearings.[105][106][102] Public Citizen concluded that Truth Social's content moderation was substantially more limiting than Twitter, and said Truth Social's policies were creating an echo chamber of violent views. cite

 

[Mr Holmes]

Elon Musk Deems ‘Cis’ A Twitter Slur–Here’s Why It’s Is So Polarizing​

Elon Musk has deemed the words “cis” and “cisgender” slurs on Twitter and warned that anyone who harasses others on Twitter will receive at least temporary suspension. The warning came after a Twitter user complained others had labeled him “cis .” Here’s what the word means and why it has become so polarizing....

That explains it. Why would they allow slurs?

 

[ChosenOne]

So we should all drop the pretense that 'the right' is pro free speech, as they could GAF about free speech being limited when it is not them.

And Twitter prior to Musk, NEVER disproportionately targeted the right for banning. The difference is that when a normal person is warned 'you just broke our TOS and that post will be taken down', most people correct or move on. Those on the right used it to give Twitter the middle finger, while saying they would never comply with the rules and reposting the TOS infraction because it how they gained influence in the magat community. That is the main reason people on the right got banned more, and that would happen in sherdog or X or any platform now if you defy TOS. As it should.

 

[ChosenOne]

That explains it. Why would they allow slurs?

It "explains it" if you are magat.

Free Speech if you actually believe in it, DOES NOT allow one single person , in his discretion to define what are and are not slurs, and then ban that speech.

If that was your actual position you would believe free speech dead on any platform as all they would have to do is say 'we now consider that word a slur', and thus you would say 'they are justified in shutting down that speech'.


And then the next day as a magat you would say 'but i support free speech and believe in it', because that is how the magat mind works.

 

[RoastBeast]

Fantastic Podcast...

Joe Rogan probably said about 50 words total.... Just listened and absorbed

It was pretty terrifying to listen to. Pretty much flies in the face of all the bullshit the leftists on here tell us about censorship. It's all going down just the way we thought it would.

 

[RoastBeast]

?
I see nothing censored on X. I am on it a good amount, you get views from both sides.

As far as Truth, I don't know, I am not in that. I would assume everything except Trump is great is removed.

Leftists tried to pretend that Twitter turned into one giant klan meeting full of child porn as soon as Elon took over.

 

[jefferz]

I dont know about Hillaries opinion, didnt even bother to listen


This subject gets conflated a lot based on personal views, and people cry "freedom of speech" when they are prohibited from saying shitty or horrible things to people.

I think we can all agree some level of regulation is needed on these online platforms.

Otherwise they can become even more toxic and just shitty than they already are, I cant imagine any rational person wants that.

A lot of people that scream free speech don’t mean it in a legal way.
They don’t like it when they say something controversial, and are called out on it.
You’re allowed to have your opinions, and people are allowed to tell you that you’re wrong. Thats not a violation of free speech. That’s the literal definition of free speech.

 

[fedorthegoat777]

You "seeing nothing" means you probably like what and who is being banned by Elon.

Elon regularly bans people and 'talk' that is of a 'left' leaning bent.

So you think that one tweet represents the millions of messages posted the l there?

I regularly see stuff on the left and right.

 

[Mr Holmes]

It "explains it" if you are magat.

Free Speech if you actually believe in it, DOES NOT allow one single person , in his discretion to define what are and are not slurs, and then ban that speech.

If that was your actual position you would believe free speech dead on any platform as all they would have to do is say 'we now consider that word a slur', and thus you would say 'they are justified in shutting down that speech'.


And then the next day as a magat you would say 'but i support free speech and believe in it', because that is how the magat mind works.

LOL at "magat". You sound like an emotional child. Would you be in favor of them allowing the N-word? Or is that (D)ifferent?

 

[Whippy McGee]

Is that your cousin at the trailer park?

I swear you Drumpftards will believe anything

Right? Hunter's Laptop is Russian disinformation and Elvis Chan's emails don't prove the FBI worked with Social Media to ban, hinder, and silence opposing views. You're a clown.

So... you want to talk about who believes anything? It's Left Cult Clowns like you... here's a short list.

Jussie Smollett
Bubba Wallace garage pull
Covington kids
Kavanaugh rape
Trump pee tape
Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory
Border agents whipped migrants.
Steele Dossier
Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
Trump said drinking bleach would fight covid
Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation
Muslim travel ban
Trump built cages for migrant kids
Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich.
SUV killed parade marchers
Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
Don't say gay was in a bill
Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans
Mostly peaceful protests
Chinese Weather Baloon
BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player
Trump overpowered secret service for wheel of The Beast
Covid vaccine stops spread of covid
Masks on small children
Trump used tear gas on crowd for bible photo
Officer Sicknick was murdered by protestors
Trump called migrants animals
Inflation is transitory
Trump called for a bloodbath
Joe Biden is not senile (Cheap Fakes)
Trump assassination staged
Trump Staged his Assassination Attempt
Kamala was never Border Czar


Way to step in shit... dummy.

 

[ChosenOne]

LOL at "magat". You sound like an emotional child. Would you be in favor of them allowing the N-word? Or is that (D)ifferent?

And you think like an emotional child.

Cis is not a slur simply because one man, has said it is. That is not how language works. But the N-word is a slur.

So YES it is different to anyone beyond the logic of a child.

Would you allow any single person on the left to simply say a word is not a slur and you would say 'ok now it is ok to ban it' because that one person defined it a slur?