Social Hegseth reposts video on social media featuring pastors saying women shouldn’t be allowed to vote

I don’t think they are. The ones in this thread are all the type of people to think that way.
It's gone beyond neanderthal knuckledragging trolling on this site. They all hang out on the Andrew Tate subforums.

The fact our fucking White House has had to chime in about him sharing that pastor's views is fucking hell can we get any lower?
 
They often possess a "theology" and worldview which ends up looking like a weird fusion of the Old Testament and Pauline Epistles (especially Romans and 1 Corinthians) that borderline cuts the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ clear out of the picture,

this is very neatly put, with the minor caveat that, I'm not sure you needed the caveat 'borderline'. I'm not sure I ever heard one of these wingnuts use the phrase 'jesus said' at all, its always 'the bible says...'. and it's always a *certain* part of the bible, as you demonstrate, thanks. we're far from the first to point to the irony of the almost total lack of theological- well, i was going to say 'sophistication' but that isn't it- depth, would be more accurate. They don't have enough theological content to develop into 'sophisticated'

A lot of people say fundie evangelical Christians would fit in well with Islamic countries operating under Sharia Law
indeed, its a fairly common one from 'lefties'
 
That one dude Alex Connor, the one who broke down Shapiro on the religious hypocrisy surrounding slavery, he makes great arguments of this nature against religious pundits.

I've seen a fair bit of his stuff, he's very good indeed. He's probably the only 'arguer against Christianity' I have ever seen with the encyclopaedic knowledge of actual Christian texts he displays. He clearly knows them better than at least a couple of 'Christians' i have seen him debating (De'Souza being one). Its the epitome of good-faith debating, of paying his antagonist the respect of truly learning their material.
 
. I think the tendency by some to portray him as some sort of 1960s "hippie" is a really backhanded compliment given the aforementioned.

yes, but a complement nonetheless. you might look at it as non-Christians looking for what they see as the 'best' in his teachings.

There's a dude who stands outside a certain sports ground before every match with a sign that simply says 'god is love'. Stands there 3-4 hours every match. I dig him and I dig his effort. Even as a non religious type I really dig that kind of secular bridge certain religious messaging can give.
 
The fact our fucking White House has had to chime in about him sharing that pastor's views is fucking hell can we get any lower?

Maybe
Ufc card in the white house
 
Just tap out. You are way out of your league. I'm getting tired of trying to connect the dots for you in order for you to even understand what's being said.


You don't understand the argument. Which is strange, since you are the one that originally made the argument.
You were argumentative. You haven’t made an argument. If you were in my league, you would understand the difference.

You haven’t connected any dots. You just mumbled about some things that you hate and said it’s because of women they got passed. Actually I’m not sure you even said that much I might be giving you too much credit there.
 
Female1980’s genius insight: “All the Blacks, Mexicans, and Asians are racist. But not white people, they are the only ones who aren't racist!!!".

Me: Explain why white dudes are in Black, Mexican, and Asian gangs but you’ll never find a Black or brown person in a white gang.
Me: Explain why white gangs are the only ones built entirely around racial purity and white supremacy.
Me: Waiting for your example of the equivalent of the Latin American KKK.

I've been watching United Gangs of America on Vice the past months and one thing related to this seriously stuck out.

In the Aryan Brotherhood episode, lots of former members interviewed said that they weren't white supremacists before going to prison but that the AB pretty much forced them to. The interesting thing is that the Mexican and black gangs do not have this racial superiority component. They have a racial/ethnic component in that they help each other out and membership is limited to them, but Mexican or black racial supremacy isn't a key part of their ideology.

In other words, when whites are forced to segregate by race, they immediately, reflexively, start talking about how superior their race is, about racial purity, the Swastikas come out, etc.

So this is the reason "whites can't show pride in their race like all the other races do?" They seem incapable of showing pride without hate for others.
 
I've been watching United Gangs of America on Vice the past months and one thing related to this seriously stuck out.

In the Aryan Brotherhood episode, lots of former members interviewed said that they weren't white supremacists before going to prison but that the AB pretty much forced them to. The interesting thing is that the Mexican and black gangs do not have this racial superiority component. They have a racial/ethnic component in that they help each other out and membership is limited to them, but Mexican or black racial supremacy isn't a key part of their ideology.

In other words, when whites are forced to segregate by race, they immediately, reflexively, start talking about how superior their race is, about racial purity, the Swastikas come out, etc.

So this is the reason "whites can't show pride in their race like all the other races do?" They seem incapable of showing pride without hate for others.
I was hitching and bumming around the country 20 years back and ended up camping in northern Cali with a bunch of rainbow family types. I remember a couple younger guys were talking about spiking trees and some other eco terrorism stuff and this old crusty hippy pulled up his shirt to show a Swazi tattoo complete with a skull and ww1 spike German helmet. He told the young guys that this is where all that leads. He did 8 years hard for some ELF stuff and had to join up with the Nazis to get by in there.
 
and the protection of children ("Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."). Contingent Pacifist is more accurate, IMO. A Great Man.
A great man? Let’s pretend for a second that these parables and words of god don’t sound completely made up. Here he is saying he’ll protect kids as long as they “believe in him”. What a guy.
The massive disconnect I have with people who buy into religion can be summed up in one word: Worship. Fuck that.
 
The massive disconnect I have with people who buy into religion can be summed up in one word: Worship. Fuck that.
Pretty ballsy for a Liberal to be saying that. Do you know what a woman is yet?
 
It's honestly kind of extraordinary given the context of someone living in a province of the 1st century Roman Empire. I think the tendency by some to portray him as some sort of 1960s "hippie" is a really backhanded compliment given the aforementioned. He could be quite assertive and confrontational, and there are explicit Gospel references in support of righteous anger (i.e., driving moneychangers out of the temple), self-defense ("sell your cloak and buy a sword"), and the protection of children ("Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."). Contingent Pacifist is more accurate, IMO. A Great Man.



The thing that makes me so angry about (some of) the Christian right is the gross hypocrisy and complete rejection of Jesus' actual teachings. They are so hysterical about foreigners bringing an imagined Sharia law to America's shores, but conveniently ignore the central tenants of Christianity surrounding compassion and charity.

The same people that cheer when families are torn apart by ICE are showing up to church in their Sunday best every week.
 
Do you? Don't you spend the vast majority of your time posting on forums and playing video games?
I do love me some posting on forums and playing videogames. Not sure what that has to do with your lot worshipping at the alter of "Woke" so hard, that you've denounced basic biology.

Very cute deflection, though. I always love it when fellow forum posters shame others for posting on forums. I mean, it's Saturday night. Shouldn't you be rolling in pussy right now, and not desperately defending fellow Liberals on a Karate Forum? LOL

Looks like you play videogames as well:
The DLC kills it for me. I hate having to pay to add people to the roster.

Thanks for the laughs, stud.
 
Last edited:
I do love me some posting on forums and playing videogames. Not sure what that has to do with your lot worshipping at the alter of "Woke" so hard, that you've denounced basic biology.

Very cute deflection, though. I always love it when fellow forum posters shame others for posting on forums. I mean, it's Saturday night. Shouldn't you be rolling in pussy right now, and not desperately defending fellow Liberals on a Karate Forum? LOL

Looks like you play videogames as well:


Thanks for the laughs, stud.
There is nothing wrong with playing video games or posting on karate forums, but there is problems with a guy who revels in hate and vitriol and spends the vast majority of his time doing so. You are a loser independent of the fact that you post or play video games.
 
I do love me some posting on forums and playing videogames. Not sure what that has to do with your lot worshipping at the alter of "Woke" so hard, that you've denounced basic biology.

Very cute deflection, though. I always love it when fellow forum posters shame others for posting on forums. I mean, it's Saturday night. Shouldn't you be rolling in pussy right now, and not desperately defending fellow Liberals on a Karate Forum? LOL

Looks like you play videogames as well:


Thanks for the laughs, stud.
I like video games and forums, where’s my compliment!?
 
There is nothing wrong with playing video games or posting on karate forums
Then why did you use it as a point of attack? Didn't think that one through, did ya? LOL.
, but there is problems with a guy who revels in hate and vitriol and spends the vast majority of his time doing so.
I don't spend the majority of my time doing either, so whatever.
You are a loser independent of the fact that you post or play video games.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud.
 
Then why did you use it as a point of attack? Didn't think that one through, did ya? LOL.

I don't spend the majority of my time doing either, so whatever.

Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud.
I used it as a point of attack because you seem to spend the vast majority of your time on these activities - and you seem to spend that time (at least on forums) reveling in vitriol. Nothing wrong with either activity.... in moderation. The fact that you have 78,000 posts kind or proves my point.
 
I used it as a point of attack because you seem to spend the vast majority of your time on these activities
And you know this, how? Did you science that one up in your head?
- and you seem to spend that time (at least on forums) reveling in vitriol. Nothing wrong with either activity.... in moderation. The fact that you have 78,000 posts kind or proves my point.
Are you under the impression that it takes a long time to post in forums or something? There are plenty of Liberal posters with just as many or more posts. Why don't you attack them for the same thing?

Just take your L, stud muffin.
 
And you know this, how? Did you science that one up in your head?

Are you under the impression that it takes a long time to post in forums or something? There are plenty of Liberal posters with just as many or more posts. Why don't you attack them for the same thing?

Just take your L, stud muffin.

You are basically admitting to shit posting - yes, well reasoned and articulate posts (particularly on political/social issues), should ideally take some time. I don't know why you feel compelled to make this a political issue - whatever your political leaning, if you are posting tens of thousands of times per year, you may want to consider some additional hobbies.
 
You are basically admitting to shit posting - yes, well reasoned and articulate posts (particularly on political/social issues), should ideally take some time.
That's what you're going with, eh? How long, exactly? 3 hours a post? LOL.
I don't know why you feel compelled to make this a political issue - whatever your political leaning, if you are posting tens of thousands of times per year, you may want to consider some additional hobbies.
Post shaming on a forum you post in. There's nothing more pathetic.

Sorry for contributing so consistently, Sherdog.

Also, you really suck at math.
 
Back
Top