Social Harvard president, Claudine Gay resigns.

Was she even qualified for this position?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 6.5%
  • No

    Votes: 80 86.0%
  • Wood

    Votes: 7 7.5%

  • Total voters
    93
She even swagger-jacked RuPaul.

OIP.M4VXlt0YRlPAs2Y0zb-85gHaJP


urkel.jpg



harvard-claudine-gay.jpg


sddefault.jpg


240102-claudine-gay-harvard-mn-1315-b7c325.jpg
 
When it’s too much even for Nate



This is why people are losing trust with MSM

Just non stop Bs and games



Wait lol, "resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism"??? LOL!

Plagiarism good?
Not all plagiarism is bad plagiarism?
93% peaceful plagiarism?

We've good some good material to work with if they roll with this one.
 
You should go back to doing Wadtucket bombs and liking every post in a thread...

You've really gone downhill since you've actually started posting
You're just salty 'cause you fell for the bit...lol
 
Best take is from Chait, IMO:


That article understated the extend of Gay's plagerism and copying other people's work. Stating that she just failed to cite sources. Instead of noting she copied entire passages... for her PHD dissertation.

Summary of her plagerizing without referencing.




lol... this guy has a PHD... in something
 
Best take is from Chait, IMO:

Imagine thinking her squad of oversight and review on her dissertation didn't catch and correct these problems (fun fact: some of the most egregious copy was from one of her key mentors...<Grimes01>)

They may want to look a little deeper at others maybe, no?

Article is absolute garbage, lol. Her tenure was nothing but comical theatrics from somebody unqualified for the position.
 
The plagiarism is clearly enough to have warranted her stepping down immediately.

This actually worked in Harvard's favour in getting to use this line rather than succumbing to pressure from pro-Israel groups. Perfect timing of two pieces of ineptitude.
 
Wait lol, "resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism"??? LOL!

Plagiarism good?
Not all plagiarism is bad plagiarism?
93% peaceful plagiarism?

We've good some good material to work with if they roll with this one.

Her papers were fiery but mostly non-plagiarized.
 
Imagine thinking her squad of oversight and review on her dissertation didn't catch and correct these problems (fun fact: some of the most egregious copy was from one of her key mentors...<Grimes01>)

They may want to look a little deeper at others maybe, no?

Article is absolute garbage, lol. Her tenure was nothing but comical theatrics from somebody unqualified for the position.
It’s the perfect Jack article. It both admits what she did was wrong but not really.
 
Didn't the first accusations of plagiarism come about AFTER her hearing about the genocide stuff?

LOL, if so I could see that Harvard had this ready to drop when needed and likely spearheaded the 40 point accusation from "outside" sources....
 
When I go to Google and start typing in 'Claudine Gay plagiarism' there is no link, no autofill, no connection to the word in any of the suggestions. Only when I hit enter anyway am I taken to the real results (dozens of pages connecting the two subject matters).

Yucky.


hAN2Zyt.png

U8BOjeM.png

MN0TPNp.png

yZWvtN8.png

EB2TY8I.png

usw7Ds8.png

XYGTsPW.png

YiWOV9H.png

9GjjWNQ.png

qDqdFpB.png

tm63msI.png



PpgE8Dh.png

stephen-a-smith-rolls-eyes.gif
 
Last edited:
the woke left: "blacks are so dumb that they're allowed to plagiarize and if god forbid they're removed for their incompetency we'll give them the ultimate participation trophy and keep paying them"

<JackieThumbsUp>

holy shit, is there any other scenario here?
 
Imagine thinking her squad of oversight and review on her dissertation didn't catch and correct these problems (fun fact: some of the most egregious copy was from one of her key mentors...<Grimes01>)

They may want to look a little deeper at others maybe, no?

Article is absolute garbage, lol. Her tenure was nothing but comical theatrics from somebody unqualified for the position.

Doesn't stop the woke mob from claiming the Race Card



GC8nkbMXoAA9Q0T
 
Best take is from Chait, IMO:


I agree/disagree with certain aspects of this article.

he spends too much time attacking Christopher Rufo, and the hearings were NOT a trap. she and the MIT/Penn state president had several opportunities to answer the question at hand, even deliver nuanced responses, such as "well...what chants/threats are we referring to? what calls for gen0cide? are we referring to certain slogans like "river to the sea?" this means different things to different people..."

her answer was abysmal, as were the answers from the other two. cowardly in fact.

I don't like the term "immaterial' here, but I for the most part agree with this statement from Chait.:

Gay’s offenses, while immaterial to the main thrust of her work, would have invited stern punishment if committed by an undergraduate
 
Back
Top