yea, it was odd. nobody was saying it was a robbery though. i had loma 115-113. not sure how one judge gave the 10th to haney
What gets to me is the judge scoring round 10 for Haney. I'm not sure how that's possible without at the very least a strong bias or absurd incompetence.
Moretti is like 80yrs old and has been, let's say blundering, for years.
people hate on him and call him overrated and one-dimensional because he's a big fan favorite and a lot of his fans use all sorts of hyperbole when describing him. it's a weird reason to be critical of a fighter, but that's how people are.So according to some "experts" here, Loma is an overrated one dimensional fighter. Yet an aging Loma outlanded the bigger undisputed champ, wobbled him, and won in the eyes of a lot of fans and professional boxers?
Gotta love these sherdog experts
<Oku02>
Neither fighter landed much, neither was very accurate. That makes the clean punching, defense and effective aggression very close. In the clean punching department Haney secured a bunch of rounds landing the more telling blows (ie the rights to the body). And ring generalship is key. For large portions of the fight Haney kept Lomachenko at bay with the jab and rights to the body and when Loma tried to get inside and do his thing (ie pivot or step to his right to throw a combo behind the southpaw jab) Haney grabbed him or countered early.
It’s not like Haney outclassed Loma but scoringwise he did enough to bag half the rounds or a little more. Now it is possible to give the fight to Loma, 3 scoring critera out of 4 were very close in most rounds after all and he landed big upstairs a few times, but crying robbery on this one is far fetched.
Is keeping your opponent at bay showing sufficient ring generalship when he is the one pressing rhe pace, landing the cleaner and more powerful shots and more of them?
people hate on him and call him overrated and one-dimensional because he's a big fan favorite and a lot of his fans use all sorts of hyperbole when describing him. it's a weird reason to be critical of a fighter, but that's how people are.
i had lomachenko winning this, but i'm clearly biased towards him. that said, no matter how you scored it or who you rooted for, the ukrainian came to fight. he was ready and he looked good. this was a really good, really competitive fight, and vasyl showed he obviously still belongs with the top guys in the division. his detractors will will shit on him for losing this fight, of course, but there's no shame in a performance like that.