- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 53,978
- Reaction score
- 31,146
What? Don't remember that. Must've misread it as "anti-Zionist" rather than "anti-Judaism" or perhaps he meant that criticizing the religion isn't necessarily bigotry against the people. That is said about Islam all the time and I'm sure you'd agree with it in that context.You can understand that when you like the “I am rooting for Hamas” posts or the “anti-Judaism is not antisemitism” might color my interpretation of your posts?
Either way if we're going to "like" police then I think its fair for me to notice that you've liked posts pushing the most radical settler vision ITT like here. Again, imagine if I went around saying you support the radical settler movement based off that, do you think that would be good faith?
Well if I said based off that interaction that you support military dictatorship, do you think that would be fair? Or do you think it'd be more fair to acknowledge that in a country like Egypt there are no good options and that either way one is picking a "lesser evil"?Also the interactions just now with the Muslim Brotherhood support…
The Muslim world needs political and economic reform, not religious reform. That means an end to dictatorship and corruption. Let's focus on that first.Let's have a come to Jesus moment here for a minute, bud. Islam is in a serious need of a reform. If its adherents could stop believing in harboring hatred and violent intentions towards unbelievers, women, and homosexuals, that'd be greeeeaaaat...
You asked me many things and I was answering them, that I didn't answer every single thing shouldn't mean you go around making uncharitable assumptions about my views and since you did I am going to assume you are operating in bad faith. Certainly I wouldn't do that to you despite the fact that you were happy to defend false beliefs about Muslims and evade questions about Jewish extremism. I've already condemned Islamic extremism a few times ITT but for people like you its never enough.Again I think this is a misrepresentation and false comparison. You didn't ask me to clarify my stance on those points. If you did, I would have happily have answered.
The conversation showed me asking you five times directly what your general thoughts were on X subject (really gentle wording even) and you purposely ignoring or omitting it from the conversation. There was no assumption on my part - your lack of answer despite my repeated questioning was an answer within itself.
Last edited: