He clearly lost to Jones and he beat DCGusto fought likely 2 best ever LHWs. Barely lost to both - but ......... HE LOST BOTH.
No he didn't. It was a close fight and it could of gone either way. A flip fight should go to Champ an it did both times.He clearly lost to Jones and he beat DC
Disagree. Your boy lost.He clearly landed the more effective strikes in round 4 and more of them total
I’m not a gustafsson fan and I wasn’t when he was active. I think he clearly lost to Jones with no argument for him winning that fightDisagree. Your boy lost.
RESULTS determine who is better.Gustafsson who fought Jones, DC, Thiago Silva and Glover was one of the 20 best p4p MMA fighters all time. So sad his career suddenly declined so much and he is not seen today as the exceptional fighter he was
He was easily a better fighter than Pereira and will not be remembered not even nearly as much as a legend as the brazilian will be
IMO he lost both fights. Disagree with your take on the 4th round. Was on his back foot entire round. Not even close.I’m not a gustafsson fan and I wasn’t when he was active. I think he clearly lost to Jones with no argument for him winning that fight
So Forrest > Rumble lolRESULTS determine who is better.
Always.
stop it lmaoSo Forrest > Rumble lol
Moving backwards doesn’t matterIMO he lost both fights. Disagree with your take on the 4th round. Was on his back foot entire round. Not even close.
You are contradicting yourselfWho would win head to head? Rumble. But yes Griffin was a champion and Rumble was not, because Rumble had a harder division to try to do it it.
You can't take such a one dimensional viewpoint on these things.
Forrest is more accomplished. That doesn't mean he was the better fighter.You are contradicting yourself
If results define who is the best and Forrest had better results (since he was champion) then Forrest > Rumble
This only shows that this premise is wrong