• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Gustafsson beat Cormier…

Gustafsson who fought Jones, DC, Thiago Silva and Glover was one of the 20 best p4p MMA fighters all time. So sad his career suddenly declined so much and he is not seen today as the exceptional fighter he was

He was easily a better fighter than Pereira and will not be remembered not even nearly as much as a legend as the brazilian will be
 
Disagree. Your boy lost.
I’m not a gustafsson fan and I wasn’t when he was active. I think he clearly lost to Jones with no argument for him winning that fight
 
His fights vs Jones and DC are probably the two most impressive performances in a loss in MMA history. Both of those fights could have gone either way
 
Gustafsson who fought Jones, DC, Thiago Silva and Glover was one of the 20 best p4p MMA fighters all time. So sad his career suddenly declined so much and he is not seen today as the exceptional fighter he was

He was easily a better fighter than Pereira and will not be remembered not even nearly as much as a legend as the brazilian will be
RESULTS determine who is better.

Always.
 
I’m not a gustafsson fan and I wasn’t when he was active. I think he clearly lost to Jones with no argument for him winning that fight
IMO he lost both fights. Disagree with your take on the 4th round. Was on his back foot entire round. Not even close.
 
Who would win head to head? Rumble. But yes Griffin was a champion and Rumble was not, because Rumble had a harder division to try to do it it.

You can't take such a one dimensional viewpoint on these things.
 
Who would win head to head? Rumble. But yes Griffin was a champion and Rumble was not, because Rumble had a harder division to try to do it it.

You can't take such a one dimensional viewpoint on these things.
You are contradicting yourself

If results define who is the best and Forrest had better results (since he was champion) then Forrest > Rumble
This only shows that this premise is wrong
 
You are contradicting yourself

If results define who is the best and Forrest had better results (since he was champion) then Forrest > Rumble
This only shows that this premise is wrong
Forrest is more accomplished. That doesn't mean he was the better fighter.
 
I never rewatched it but never though of it as close actually
 
Back
Top