- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 18,323
- Reaction score
- 4,258
Well you're all off the hook because of a technicality you have all been waiting for to abuse.
Dude get a grip. We’re talking about a drawing
Well you're all off the hook because of a technicality you have all been waiting for to abuse.
0/100
called statutory rape
shes a minor
but keep playing edgelord with your new account former ban
It's not lawful to rape a minor, sorry Raptac.
A drawing depicting a 17 year old getting fucked/raped because you disagree with her view points. Dude... Like how old are you guys, in your 30's-40's? Absolutely pathetic.Dude get a grip. We’re talking about a drawing
0/100
called statutory rape
shes a minor
but keep playing edgelord with your new account former ban
Imagine being an actual adult and making that sticker and being like "yeah boys she's 17 I'm technically able to depict a child getting fucked"Conservatives so triggered by a teenager that they are ok with this.
Not surprising.
Rape?Nobody here is defending that, yet you guys are defending depicting raping a 17 year old.
A drawing depicting a 17 year old getting fucked/raped because you disagree with her view points. Dude... Like how old are you guys, in your 30's-40's? Absolutely pathetic.
You tried to pull the pizzagate card so I gave you some examples of things that were hushed up or said to be fake but then blew up into major scandals involving abuse.Didn't say that.
It's not lawful to rape a minor, sorry Raptac.
How are you so sure it's not rape? It's not like Greta is fond of right wingers, or right wingers of her. She just turned 17 so technically it's not statutory rape, congratulations. I think with the way right wingers hate and despise her and have waiting until she turned 17 to avoid legal problem, it's pretty clear there is no consent involved here in the picture.There’s no depiction of rape. It’s definitely in bad taste but, your feelings aside, you are going to be held to an honest accounting of the situation.
It’s really something to behold after all the bs in the Desmond threads.LOL at the virtue signaling Libs in here seething over this, but finding no issue with the Podesta family art collection.
It's distasteful as fuck, but please spare us the moral grandstanding.
You're a moron that doesn't know the difference between real and fake crimes.You tried to pull the pizzagate card so I gave you some examples of things that were hushed up or said to be fake but then blew up into major scandals involving abuse.
Whether or not the drawing is depicting rape really isn't relevant. To portray a 17 year old girl literally being fucked with a company logo on as a means to disparage her for her political/ideological views, especially considering the malicious intent, is completely unacceptable. I don't understand how this is a political issue.There’s no depiction of rape. It’s definitely in bad taste but, your dramatic feelings aside, you are going to be held to an honest accounting of the situation.
Cmon.How are you so sure it's not rape? It's not like Greta is fond of right wingers, or right wingers of her. She just turned 17 so technically it's not statutory rape, congratulations. I think with the way right wingers hate and despise her and have waiting until she turned 17 to avoid legal problem, it's pretty clear there is no consent involved here in the picture.
Fighting the good fight by the way, Gunny.
it's pretty clear there is no consent involved here in the picture.
How are you so sure it's not rape? It's not like Greta is fond of right wingers, or right wingers of her. She just turned 17 so technically it's not statutory rape, congratulations. I think with the way right wingers hate and despise her and have waiting until she turned 17 to avoid legal problem, it's pretty clear there is no consent involved here in the picture.
Fighting the good fight by the way, Gunny.