• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Greta Thunberg Megathread

Staph infection said:
So it is not ok to sexualize this child but it is ok to sexualize small boys? Do you think there is anything wrong with the drag queen boy that dances in short shorts while gay men throw money at him? If people see nothing wrong with that then they should see nothing wrong with this.
Click to expand...
It’s only ok when it’s done in the name of progressiveness.
 
Sano said:
What are you even talking about?
Click to expand...

Liberals trying to claim a moral high ground over this, after they've already displayed that they don't care about art depicting little children in a sexually suggestive manner.
 
Raptac said:
What rape ?

Seriously where, is your argument so pathetic you just have to make shit up.
Click to expand...
She's a minor and the subtext in the picture is very obvious, but keep pretending you don't know what's being depicted because you're a little coward.
 
tonni said:
<WellThere>Here's some decent, conservative adults who vehemently dislike degeneracy and think it's the left that has a problem with sexualizing children. The side of "logic and reason" too.
Click to expand...
Did I say I condoned the actions? Next time a topic like this comes up tag some of your ilk who say nothing to see here.....
 
Raptac said:
What rape ?

Seriously where, is your argument so pathetic you just have to make shit up.
Click to expand...
0/100
called statutory rape
shes a minor
but keep playing edgelord with your new account former ban
 
tonni said:
She's a minor and the subtext in the picture is very obvious, but keep pretending you don't know what's being depicted because you're a little coward.
Click to expand...

Its depicting lawfull sex.

Once again you pathetic liberal, what rape ?
 
Teen Wolf said:
Imagine letting a child get you this worked up.
Click to expand...

When children provoke people by saying or wearing things grown adults don't like, they are considered "fair game." So it's all good.

smirk.jpg

453705.jpg
 
Last edited:
Staph infection said:
I know right, if this was a right leaning poster child they would be in here saying what is the big deal.
Click to expand...
No, we wouldn't. Show me one instance of a child being depicted in this way and a leftist here condoning it? Just straight up smears to hide the fact that you're part of a group of degenerates.
 
cincymma79 said:
No I think banging kids is wrong even if I concede that there really isn’t a difference between 17 & 18, but I don’t bang 18 year olds either
Click to expand...
out of principle? Or because they are annoying?
 
She’s 17, I don’t get it.
That’s legal, and the drawing down the indicate that she was unwilling
 
Lucas Troy said:
0/100
called statutory rape
shes a minor
but keep playing edgelord with your new account former ban
Click to expand...
The subtext in the cartoon is very obvious too, regardless of her age. They're just pretending, like always, because they're cowards. Just like they're pretending here that leftists on this forum think it's alright for an 8 year old to be drugged and being in a strip club. No principles or moral backbone at all.
 
HereticBD said:
Liberals trying to claim a moral high ground over this, after they've already displayed that they don't care about art depicting little children in a sexually suggestive manner.
Click to expand...
Again, what are you talking about? I don't know who that person is, and I fail to see how that has any relevance on this thread or the subject matter. Which people in this thread exactly are hypocrites?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,947
Messages
58,404,255
Members
176,030
Latest member
santozsbjj

Share this page

Back
Top