Social Greta Thunberg Megathread

Take up your issues with Webster's.
According to Webster's,
Definition of retarded


1dated, now usually offensive : slow or limited in intellectual or emotional development : characterized by mental retardation
2informal, usually offensive : very stupid or foolish

You can say anyone slower than average in intellectual or emotional development is retarded, but that's a pretty huge chunk of the population and sort of renders the word meaningless.
 
There's not much difference here then when liberals cheer on the drag/tranny kids.
 
According to Webster's,


You can say anyone slower than average in intellectual or emotional development is retarded, but that's a pretty huge chunk of the population and sort of renders the word meaningless.

Yes you could.

You can call anyone infertile or homosexual to have a genetic defect. Because the human race is supposed to reproduce. And so on for a host of other genetic disorders or flaws. Being allergic to bees is a genetic defect. Humans are not supposed to be killed by a bee sting.

But again, political correctness has made it offensive to say a gay person has a genetic defect or was a flaw in the gene pool, even if it's the truth.

Greta Thuberg is a retard. It's not uncommon in that category, but that is the truth.
 
Bullshit. Thunberg is not talking about cleaning up her own mess. This week she traveled across the ocean to lecture a nation who are not her own people and today addressed the United Nations, which [purports to rep[resent the entire world.

But yes, the extreme insistence on keeping the world's second largest economy out of the conversation proves that my original quip was well aimed.

The climate hysteria isn't aimed at controlling carbon emissions. It's about controlling western democracies.

There is a noticeable self-flagellation tendency running through the new climate religion. Like they get off on it, or it is expected to prove ones faith.

It's all well and good to be self critical, but it is one sided and almost emotionally protected. Like the idea of a significant part of the problem being outside of the West (and thus watering down their self guilt) is undermining their belief system.
 
If you believe, as Greta Thunberg does, that carbon dioxide emissions are a literal extinction level crisis, then prudence would dictate maximum possible pressure on China, which emits more Co2 than the US and the EU combined.

But China is not a weak retort in any sense when it comes to environmental problems. They are far and away the worst offender globally. You've got it backward, it is the lack of pressure on China that gives away the game: these people aren't seriously worried. They just want us to be worried.

So the West should implement extremist and unrealistic climate change policies that put itself at a huge economic, industrial, military and technological disadvantage because the biggest manufacturer and polluter won't listen to virtue signalers and the climate science racketeers? Makes sense.

Makes as much sense as one society deciding to become pacifists while their neighbors become more aggressive and imperialistic. That's not going to work out well in the long-run.

Whoa whoa bigots why are you attacking the children are you insecure??

India has 22 of the highest polluting cities on this planet....China the other 8. But remember guys it’s our problem and we have to pay out the ass for it. Oh and hey 10 of the rivers most polluting our oceans....2 in Africa 8 between China and India...

<seedat>
 
A learning disorder is not the same thing as a serious mental/emotional/social disorder. It's just deflecting the issue.

She says she has Aspergers, that means she's retarded by definition, both in dictionaries and my own. But no one wants to call her a retard and yet believe criticism of her is despicable because she's a retard.
Autism and mental retardation are not mutually exclusive. Developmental disorder is not mutually exclusive with IQ. You are incorrect here.
 
You think CNN and and NYT will spend hours on this tomorrow ? Trump owning the room lol

 
There is a noticeable self-flagellation tendency running through the new climate religion. Like they get off on it, or it is expected to prove ones faith.

It's all well and good to be self critical, but it is one sided and almost emotionally protected. Like the idea of a significant part of the problem being outside of the West (and thus watering down their self guilt) is undermining their belief system.

Precisely.
 
Yes you could.

You can call anyone infertile or homosexual to have a genetic defect. Because the human race is supposed to reproduce. And so on for a host of other genetic disorders or flaws.

But again, political correctness has made it offensive to say a gay person has a genetic defect, even if it's the truth.

Greta Thuberg is a retard. It's not uncommon in that category, but that is the truth.
You just said a few posts ago when I asked if a dyslexic was retarded that no, a learning disability is different. But an inability to read slows down the learning process. So by your own definition they are retarded.

You are obviously making this up as you go because you need to both victimize yourself by claiming your speech is limited and project that you are tough intellectual who merely keeps it real.

Infertility could be caused by many things outside of genetic factors and experts have recently claimed that there is no evidence to homosexuality and genetics.
 
You just said a few posts ago when I asked if a dyslexic was retarded that no, a learning disability is different. But an inability to read slows down the learning process. So by your own definition they are retarded.

You are obviously making this up as you go because you need to both victimize yourself by claiming your speech is limited and project that you are tough intellectual who merely keeps it real.

Infertility could be caused by many things outside of genetic factors and experts have recently claimed that there is no evidence to homosexuality and genetics.

I'm even sure what you are talking about at this point.

She says she has Aspergers, others have described her as autistic.

Both of those should quality as retarded under any interpretation.

She's a retard. Deal with it.
 
I'm even sure what you are talking about at this point.

She says she has Aspergers, others have described her as autistic.

Both of those should quality as retarded under any interpretation.

She's a retard. Deal with it.
Changing the goal post to *should* qualify, now. ;)

You're wrong, but you're just trollin anyways.
 
That's misleading. China is the largest CO2 producer, but the US is higher per capita contributions.
But it's besides the point. One country shouldn't say that they have no obligations because other countries are worse. We live on the same planet and everyone needs to do their part (and some need to do more than others).

1. The US gets an amazing amount of attention paid to its emissions. China not so much. If they got half as much condemnation as western nations do, I might start thinking you guys are serious about your climate fears.
2. Not only did I never say that this is about the US having no obligations, I pointed out specifically that this was not my point.
3. My point is if the mitigating climate change was the real goal of this movement, that China would be far more regularly and roundly condemned. But the goal of the climatetistas is political control in the west. China is irrelevant to their goals and it shows.
 
Changing the goal post to *should* qualify, now. ;)

You're wrong, but you're just trollin anyways.

It's that hard to get? Even a dude arguing that Webster's definition is too broad should acknowledge that under even far more conservative descriptions, a person with Aspergers or autism can and should be described as retarded.
 
It's that hard to get? Even a dude arguing that Webster's definition is too broad should acknowledge that under even far more conservative descriptions, a person with Aspergers or autism can and should be described as retarded.
It is described as a variety of developmental disorders, but that doesn't mean it is mutually exclusive to a lower IQ. Someone being socially awkward and obsessed with trivial things wouldn't be considered retarded, no?

You're ascribing a biased but focused viewpoint when talking about something that includes a wide variety of variables. So the definition of developmental disorder automatically means retarded to you.

Trollin or not, it's just plain factually inaccurate, and a bit ironic.
 
It's that hard to get? Even a dude arguing that Webster's definition is too broad should acknowledge that under even far more conservative descriptions, a person with Aspergers or autism can and should be described as retarded.
Most definitions specify that it's being "significantly" below the average, or may even state it's anything below a 70 IQ. How hard is it to admit you're wrong and move on?
 
Most definitions specify that it's being "significantly" below the average, or may even state it's anything below a 70 IQ. How hard is it to admit you're wrong and move on?

Ask yourself that. How do you know what her IQ is? You are guessing. She claims she has Aspergers, you don't think that qualifies as a retard, so be it. I say it does.
 
This just about says it all. He could not avoid the climate summit he heard there was tons of hot 6 foot tall Swedish girls covering Greta's speech LOL. Why else would he be there he does not care about Climate change.


"
"Trump has meanwhile repeatedly voiced skepticism about climate change. He made an unexpected appearance at the U.N. climate summit, but only stayed for between 10 and 15 minutes.
"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top