Social Greta Thunberg Megathread

thehighking said:
Manmade global warming is a complete hoax. The Earth has been going through cycles of getting hotter and colder for billions of years. A couple of hundred years are absolutely meaningless in the grand scheme of the Earth. In the future the sun will eventually make Earth inhospitable because of increasing temperatures. Increasing taxes and moving to clean energy won't stop the planet from being destroyed eventually, nor will it prevent the next ice age.
Click to expand...

The current change in temperature is thousands of years early, and the increase in C02 at this stage is unprecedented.

Neither of these things are a hoax.
 
Loiosh said:
The current change in temperature is thousands of years early, and the increase in C02 at this stage is unprecedented.

Neither of these things are a hoax.
Click to expand...
I think it's bullshit. We only have accurate temperature readings for the last 200 years. The truth is we don't have exact temperature records beyond those 200 years. Scientists are unable to determine the exact temperature in 3200BC. They can only use estimates since there was no recorded temperatures back then. If the Earth was on a downward temperature change (as it will be, it is cyclical in nature) then manmade global cooling would be a crisis and a reason used to justify increased taxes. There are variables at play that affect the planet that are so much more impactful than humans could ever be. The Earths core and the sun for example. It's a hoax but the propaganda has been pushed so hard and the social conditioning has been achieved so well that people are either fooled by the 'science' or afraid to speak up against it.
And regarding CO2, Plants grow larger and more abundantly in CO2 rich environments.
 
thehighking said:
I think it's bullshit. We only have accurate temperature readings for the last 200 years. The truth is we don't have exact temperature records beyond those 200 years. Scientists are unable to determine the exact temperature in 3200BC. They can only use estimates since there was no recorded temperatures back then. If the Earth was on a downward temperature change (as it will be, it is cyclical in nature) then manmade global cooling would be a crisis and a reason used to justify increased taxes. There are variables at play that affect the planet that are so much more impactful than humans could ever be. The Earths core and the sun for example. It's a hoax but the propaganda has been pushed so hard and the social conditioning has been achieved so well that people are either fooled by the 'science' or afraid to speak up against it.
And regarding CO2, Plants grow larger and more abundantly in CO2 rich environments.
Click to expand...

So are you smarter and more informed than all the world's scientists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson (and any other with credentials)... Or are they all in on a Satanic child molesting conspiracy against the world or something?
It's provable, just like the whole flat earth "controversy". These are facts.
 
Ridgeback said:
So are you smarter and more informed than all the world's scientists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson (and any other with credentials)... Or are they all in on a Satanic child molesting conspiracy against the world or something?
It's provable, just like the whole flat earth "controversy". These are facts.
Click to expand...
See that's the silly argument that's always used. But it's not true. There are a lot of scientists who disagree and they aren't given a platform on propaganda mediums because it doesn't fit the agenda (not to mention they risk their careers to voice such opinions since there is a cancel culture that was developed to silence dissenters). That's really a huge issue that you've raised there. The propaganda campaign is extremely similar to the covid hysteria and the globalist WEF movement, where propagandists use slogans like 'trust the scientists', 'believe in the science'. However these propagandists don't mean that. They mean 'trust these scientists not those ones', 'believe in this study don't look at that graph'. Propaganda works so well today that indoctrinated people just call it news.
 
thehighking said:
See that's the silly argument that's always used. But it's not true. There are a lot of scientists who disagree and they aren't given a platform on propaganda mediums because it doesn't fit the agenda (not to mention they risk their careers to voice such opinions since there is a cancel culture that was developed to silence dissenters). That's really a huge issue that you've raised there. The propaganda campaign is extremely similar to the covid hysteria and the globalist WEF movement, where propagandists use slogans like 'trust the scientists', 'believe in the science'. However these propagandists don't mean that. They mean 'trust these scientists not those ones', 'believe in this study don't look at that graph'. Propaganda works so well today that indoctrinated people just call it news.
Click to expand...
This is complete bogus. Every scientist has equal access to scientific journals and science is challenged constantly. Disproving or changing theories has historically been what has propelled scientists into high acclaim.
 
Last edited:
Crom Cruach said:
Nah.

Jewish space lasers are beaming her instructions direct into her head.
Click to expand...

Can you fill me in on these space lasers? Most of my right wing propaganda comes from our trusty sherfronters but I must have missed that one. I am very curious though.
Kandyland said:
Sherfont doesn't even make sense since the election most posters are left leaning. If anything this place should be called "Soyfront". I'm also very happy a poster like you that never showed your face around all of a sudden showed up in the War Room spilling your soy.
Click to expand...

Yes, because not believing in conspiracy theories automatically = soyboy. Also not posting a ton means I just started posting here. I have to admit I expected more out of you after your public break up with Uncle Donald, looks like that isn't going so well though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
shankmcgank said:
That's great and all, but Sweden has 10% of the US population.
Click to expand...
It's actually more like 3%.
shankmcgank said:
She's also lecturing the world, not just Sweden, about single use plastics, which is where the "most type of single-use plastics cannot be recycled in the United States" comes in.

Imagine lecturing people about single use plastics, while having a feast supplied from single use plastics whenever you feel like it.

I'm not surprised though, libtards are very good at "Rules for thee, not for me".
Click to expand...
As long as she personally disposes of those bags the proper way, it is not hypocritical of her to urge the rest of the world to do the same. Obviously not all countries have the same recycling infrastructure as Sweden, in which case her lecturing should be aimed at the governments of those countries more than their inhabitants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
Are we still talking about this girl? She shouldn't be interesting enough to sustain a 145 page thread.

Good grief.
 
I believe climate change is real and i believe something have to be done

I also believe greta thunberg is a ridicolous artificial gimmick to get retard politicized people and naive youngs nodding
 
Bacco said:
I believe climate change is real and i believe something have to be done

I also believe greta thunberg is a ridicolous artificial gimmick to get retard politicized people and naive youngs nodding
Click to expand...
Pretty much sums up this thread. Even if you dont believe in climate change as the scientists talk about it I think we can all agree that polluting less would be good for everyone for a variety of reasons.

And if you cant see that little greta is a front for a grift run by her parents I dont know what to tell you
 
shankmcgank said:
That's great and all, but Sweden has 10% of the US population.

She's also lecturing the world, not just Sweden, about single use plastics, which is where the "most type of single-use plastics cannot be recycled in the United States" comes in.

Imagine lecturing people about single use plastics, while having a feast supplied from single use plastics whenever you feel like it.

I'm not surprised though, libtards are very good at "Rules for thee, not for me".
Click to expand...
The. Plastics. Are. Recyclable. In Sweden. Much less waste. So her idea is not the same as an American spouting the same line. And due to how populations work a larger one should make it EASIER. Not harder, to put in a mass recycling program because there are larger actual numbers of scientists who can implement it.
 
Folks, single use plastics are not recyclable. In fact the vast majority of plastics in the market are not recyclable.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,266,817
Messages
57,430,575
Members
175,704
Latest member
Brôk boi

Share this page

Back
Top