- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 25,896
- Reaction score
- 9,001
He did destroy Tanner
Yeah, when?
He did destroy Tanner
dude... just dont compare dan fucking hardy with Okami... EVERY Okami fight is a snooze fest while Hardy fights win or lose are exciting. I agree with TS Okami is boring. YES he is a top fighter bu he is boring, he is not a drawn and he will never be. Deal with it. The cut was justified.
It has nothing to do with excitement, it's about winning.
This is a business designed to take the best fighters in the world and pit their skills in a cage for our bloodthirsty pleasure to see who is the best. .... for our entertainment. I like the fact that fighters are pressured to preform....to be under constant stress that they could be cut at any moment....JUST LIKE FOOTBALL.
This is how the world works. The UFC is a legitimized sport....not a government funded Olympics.
No, the NFL doesn't reject good players. Horrible comparison.
People watch to be entertained and excited. MMA is about watching two men beat the shit out of each other for our tittilation.
Let's not include that Marquardt fight into the general statement he's "boring", that fight was beyond boring. You can see his last 4 fights, but in his last 6, he's 3-3, while those wins are by decision, and one against Buddy Roberts, who I don't know who he is.
He was boring, he had his title shot, he got beat by Tim Boetsch, by Jacare, yeah, Jacare is good, but being defeated that way by those two guys and the best you can do is "win boring decision fights", makes you wonder if you get Dana on a bad day, if that resume will keep you employed.
You reached not the overall top, but YOUR top, Okami wasn't getting another title shot, nor winning a title, nor defeating top contenders decisively.
Getting cut is a 50/50.
It's still a sport whether a certain fighter gets cut or not. Dana has the right and power as president of UFC to perceive and determine if a figher is sucky (irregardless of ranking)...and cut him based on judgement and financial biases. Just like a NFL team owner getting rid of Tebow. This type of proactivity will produce higher entertaining fights in the future.
How was the cut justified? Having Okami on your roster to fight on your under card would improve the rest of the middleweight roster by helping to weed out contenders and would have no effect what so ever on pay per view buys.