• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread Vol. 2

I mean, if a large media company, like CNN and MSNBC is allowing Pfizer to advertise on their networks, one can assume that their position isn't 100 percent objective when it comes to covering Pfizer vaccines.

I've yet to check out the Sonia Elijah/Doshi rebuttal but another very good interview with that also uses the company's own emails etc from whistle blowers is Sasha Latypova. She's superb mate and has been screaming to the world from the moment she became aware if the problems.




Pfizer had an all cause mortality increase of 23% in the vaxxed compared to the unvaxxed. This is just a fraction of the information they tried to hide first for 55 and the second time for 75 years(with the FDA).

Now we're having excess deaths world wide in the vaxxed countries that are well out of the norm. This needs to be investigated, plain and simple. That its not and the questioning is being shut down by the people that may be responsible is suspect in the extreme.
 
Well thats the kicker isn't it, it wasn't a free country and they had no choice. Contrary to the great Australian liars bullshit about here you got it or lost your ability to survive.

While that clown was telling the world it was business as usual my entire social network was forced unemployed or forced injected to provide for their children. When I say all, every single fucking one of us.

You couldn't get a dishwashing job or even work in retail.


You all crap on about evidence based medicine yet completely ignore the fact that the pfizer clinical trials showed an increase in all cause mortality of over 20% in the vaxxed compared to the unvaxxed. Sort of marrys up with the excess death %'s of our country's and potentially (certainly to me) explains why they unblinded and jabbed as many as they could as quickly as they could.

Lol yet you're are all saying proper trials , just lol.
You served? So you should have a very good understanding of human nature, more then most. That you are unable to see these warning sign and that your position was to potentially treat traumatic injury/illness with drugs in patients which an advance reaction may kill their weak damaged bodies isn't a good sign(being honest)

"The needs of the many always outweigh the needs of the few...

or the one."

- Spock
 
They're shameless ghouls

Some of them are willing to sacrifice everything just to say... "SEE! I WAS RIGHT!!! HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!"

It's truly sad, really.
 
The guy your quoting was one of the most prolific posters of “John Doe died after refusing the COVID vaccine” people in this site… all he’s doing is trolling in this thread- and he’s a friggin mod, lol




OGC.84d1cbc1ae899da9f485d6ef6d3cc5c5
 
Last edited:
China's COVID Surge Likely Deadlier Than U.S. Peak Before Vaccines

"The rapid surge of COVID-19 in China could be killing more people per day than at the height of fatalities in the United States two years ago, when effective vaccines weren't widely available to the public, according to modeling by British health analytics firm Airfinity.

China is likely seeing 2.42 million daily infections and 15,850 deaths a day to the virus, the company said in an updated report on Thursday. It estimates 192,400 cumulative deaths in the country since December 1, in what is the latest private sector attempt to gauge developments in China in the absence of comprehensive data out of Beijing.

In America, COVID fatalities peaked at 23,387 for the week of January 13, 2021, or an average of 3,341 per day, CDC figures show. Based on Airfinity's model, China's current daily deaths are 4.74 times higher in a population 4.25 times larger than that of the U.S.—1.41 billion vs. 331.9 million, as per the World Bank's latest records.

Airfinity forecasts China's nationwide wave will reach its first high point on January 13, with deaths likely to peak 10 days later at 25,000 a day, or 7.48 times that of the U.S. peak, for a total of 584,000 since early December.

The group predicts a second peak on March 3, when infections could hit 4.2 million a day. "We predict 1.7 million deaths across China by the end of April 2023," it said."

China's COVID Surge Likely Deadlier Than U.S. Peak Before Vaccines (msn.com)

I'm praying that China gets through this soon with as few deaths as possible.
 
I agree that the context of these people's actions are dramatically different, and hence the aforementioned pro-lockdown people were, in all likelihood, emboldened by a sense of being right - and being backed by the law.

I find most anti-vaxxers bitter, nasty people. Not all. But quite a few in this thread, for example, just come across as horrible human beings.

They can't really impose any harsh sanctions on anyone, they can't request that the vaccinated are rounded up and put in isolation wards or whatever, but I get the feeling some of them might back that kind of action. No, I'm not joking. It's not that long ago some of these dorks were imploring people to keep taking the vaccines that they confessed they believed were deadly.

Who does that, other than gutter slime?

Other than that, good post, sir, the middle ground is a much brighter, sunnier place than whatever dark corner of their minds these types are trapped in.
People like power. Especially people who've never been able to exert power. So it's no surprise the momentum of the movement swept them up and emboldened them as you said. Good people doing bad things in the name of the greater good is a theme repeated throughout history. That's why group think is a terrible idea. The herd can be driven to stampede easily.

And yes, some people on the vax hesitant (admittedly I'm one in this particular case) side and many antivaxxers are like this. That's a byproduct of being do damned convinced you're right, that "by any means necessary" becomes a viable option. And those words are as profoundly spooky as "god wills it".

The middle ground is where I believe most people start off from, but some are more easily swayed than others or they don't want to be ostracized or excommunicated. And that's why I'm so outspoken about the dangers of believing in the legitimacy of mass communication platforms. People can be easily convinced that what they see on screens is an accurate representation of reality, so they'll toe that line.

You know what I find most disturbing? The proliferation of the word "sir" on here. I place the blame squarely at the feet of @StonedLemur Bad Lemur, bad! Lol.
 
People like power. Especially people who've never been able to exert power. So it's no surprise the momentum of the movement swept them up and emboldened them as you said. Good people doing bad things in the name of the greater good is a theme repeated throughout history. That's why group think is a terrible idea. The herd can be driven to stampede easily.

And yes, some people on the vax hesitant (admittedly I'm one in this particular case) side and many antivaxxers are like this. That's a byproduct of being do damned convinced you're right, that "by any means necessary" becomes a viable option. And those words are as profoundly spooky as "god wills it".

The middle ground is where I believe most people start off from, but some are more easily swayed than others or they don't want to be ostracized or excommunicated. And that's why I'm so outspoken about the dangers of believing in the legitimacy of mass communication platforms. People can be easily convinced that what they see on screens is an accurate representation of reality, so they'll toe that line.

You know what I find most disturbing? The proliferation of the word "sir" on here. I place the blame squarely at the feet of @StonedLemur Bad Lemur, bad! Lol.

I've been blamed for worse sir lol.
 
Bodies burned in streets of China with funeral homes overwhelmed by COVID deaths

"Graphic images appear to show families in China burning the bodies of their loved ones in the streets — a horrifying consequence of the country’s current surge in COVID cases.

Between the overwhelming demand for cremations, and funeral homes reportedly raising the cost for the service amid high demand, many people have resorted to cremating their loved ones themselves.

“I’ve tried multiple paths to cremate my father but none have worked,” a Shanghai resident said in her neighborhood group chat on Dec. 28, according to screenshots shared online and reported in Bloomberg.

The post continued: “The funeral services hotline told me that all cremation slots are full until after the new year. Since national law doesn’t allow patients who die of infectious diseases to be stored at home, I shall find an empty patch in our neighborhood to cremate my father. If you have problems with this, please call the police.”

Bodies burned in streets of China with funeral homes overwhelmed by COVID deaths (msn.com)

I will not be posting the images that are on the link.
Lol.. remember the videos from the beginning of 2020 that had some Chinese people dropping like flies (which never happened anywhere), why would this be any different?

Pretty sad that this kind of propaganda still works with guys like you after all the shit we know now (and believe me they got me back then as well)
 
Lol.. remember the videos from the beginning of 2020 that had some Chinese people dropping like flies (which never happened anywhere), why would this be any different?

Pretty sad that this kind of propaganda still works with guys like you after all the shit we know now (and believe me they got me back then as well)
I have a pet theory -

Covid being a respiratory illness will have a more significant impact where lungs are already negativity impacted by environmental factors. And China has a serious pollution problem in large urban centers. And as viral load is also a major factor then it's no surprise that terribly polluted places with high population density would be hot spots. I don't know if this holds true, but around here many Chinese folks are also heavy smokers and like their booze. Combine all those factors, add in a big dose of demoralization and who knows?

But still, people randomly falling over in the streets seems a uniquely Chinese phenomenon. Are they all soccer players?
 
Lol.. remember the videos from the beginning of 2020 that had some Chinese people dropping like flies (which never happened anywhere), why would this be any different?

Pretty sad that this kind of propaganda still works with guys like you after all the shit we know now (and believe me they got me back then as well)

At least it's posted from an actual news source and not someone's twitter feed.
 
The same news source which was caught recycling photos from SARS in their covid coverage among other things.

That's bad on them.

I hope they find their way.
 
Lol here we go the implication king.

"They could reference 6000 seperate studies and it wouldn't matter because the only data you are mentioning has nothing to do with an increase in deaths in athletes"

Seriously lol its just your opinion and projection again .

Like this shitbox

"The 80 canadian doctors post was the one that i pointed out to you initially as being full of crap. It was when you tried to justify a vaccine induced motorbike accident and drowning"

No its not crap and as I keep saying, all cause mortality tells no lies. In my original posts on the subject I gave the average death rates (and ages iirc), and it was X, now its XXXXX. What I'm saying is thats a statistical red flag that warrants further and serious investigation free of bias and government influence.

You lot, "if he dies, he dies"


"Pfizers clinical data? Who cares. We are talking about deaths of athletes caused by the covid vaccines. Pfizer is one company."

Lmfao, do you even read the shit you write. Have a go at this beauty, fraudulent clinical data/trials, from a company with a very long/strong history of criminality, gives trial data after being sued that shows an increase in all cause mortality of 23%(iirc) in the vaxxed participants AND this has no possibility of being associated with the possible massive increase in athletes dying outside the statistical norm. Lol worse yet the causes of death and injuries are over representing in the vaers data, sure lets ask no questions or investigate because obviously theres nothing to see here.

"It was when you tried to justify a vaccine induced motorbike accident and drowning..."

Do you remember how I shut down that line of questioning ? Contribution of factors. The analogy I used at the time was a driver that was drunk, your argument basically ignores the possibility that alcohol may have been a contributing factor to the accident because this "accident had happened in the past". Bullshit reasoning is bullshit.
We can easily sort out the possibility of contributing factors by
1 applying a simple stain to the tissue analysis on the autopsies. I.e. old mate had a stroke and we test the tissue that failed for the vaxx spike protein. IF yes the accident was caused by a stroke that was due to the vaxxine.

2 We know have the Japanese way of sequencing gene up/down regulation due to the gene therapy. I.e. a cancer death, test the dna for down regulation of cancer fighting genes and the up regulation of cancer promoting genes.

One methed easily show acute and the other chronic (the first can also be used for causation of chronic as well)


You're full of shit mate and we both know it, personally I see you as complicit or malicious.

You aren't addressing the supposed 1500 odd vaccine related athlete deaths at any point. You are defending someone again because they say the vaccine is bad even when I point out the data they used is a blog post.
Do you remember how I shut down that line of questioning ? Contribution of factors. The analogy I used at the time was a driver that was drunk, your argument basically ignores the possibility that alcohol may have been a contributing factor to the accident because this "accident had happened in the past". Bullshit reasoning is bullshit.
And we come full circle. Congratulations you just posted that you agree with the supposed overinflated covid death toll with your vaccine death argument. We test a person for covid and they go positive now it's a covid death, let's just ignore the fact they crashed a car or were drowning whilst trying to save their kid....

It's no different and should be called out by both sides when someone uses this shoddy data. You were called out by both sides initially because there are actual posters in this thread who use decent data to make their arguments.

You got me mate. I am a Government actor paid to come onto Sherdog to debunk the truth posted by goodscience.org and Peter "the messiah" McCullough. I wish they would atleast make it take me longer than 5 mins of searching the data they reference. I wouldn't waste my time in here if I wasn't able to do it so quickly.
 
"The needs of the many always outweigh the needs of the few...

or the one."

- Spock

Needs, what needs? There is a difference between want and need, the people that wanted you all to be injected made money from it and copious amounts. They also gained copious amounts of power and control.
In reality i believe you have it in reverse, it was/is the needs of the few outweighing the needs if the many. The few are the power brokers that gained in every way vs you guinea pigs, just unfortunate that it sheds(i believe so anyway)

I noticed you have avoided my point, you give a drug and have an adverse reaction/decline in your patient do you administer more?
First time in the history of medicine since the Nurenberg code was introduced that we have ever done something so obscene and plenty have paid the price for it in just Australia alone.
 
I watched a near on hour long conference with two of the doctor's on our Hamlin Bills player's team

Shed a relief tear that his first words he wrote were "did we win?" He's still with us!

No one mentioned the Boogeyman jab being to blame.
 
You aren't addressing the supposed 1500 odd vaccine related athlete deaths at any point. You are defending someone again because they say the vaccine is bad even when I point out the data they used is a blog post.
Do you remember how I shut down that line of questioning ? Contribution of factors. The analogy I used at the time was a driver that was drunk, your argument basically ignores the possibility that alcohol may have been a contributing factor to the accident because this "accident had happened in the past". Bullshit reasoning is bullshit.
And we come full circle. Congratulations you just posted that you agree with the supposed overinflated covid death toll with your vaccine death argument. We test a person for covid and they go positive now it's a covid death, let's just ignore the fact they crashed a car or were drowning whilst trying to save their kid....

It's no different and should be called out by both sides when someone uses this shoddy data. You were called out by both sides initially because there are actual posters in this thread who use decent data to make their arguments.

You got me mate. I am a Government actor paid to come onto Sherdog to debunk the truth posted by goodscience.org and Peter "the messiah" McCullough. I wish they would atleast make it take me longer than 5 mins of searching the data they reference. I wouldn't waste my time in here if I wasn't able to do it so quickly.

"You got me mate. I am a Government actor paid to come onto Sherdog to debunk the truth"

Amazing how manipulative you are. I said I believe you're complicit or malicious and thus is the tripe you post. Complicit may be you or a close family member is in a government position or may lose financially if it turns out the vaxx is what I suspect.

As for malicious, remember the bullshit "I got a computer virus from a link you posted" supposedly fucked up your computer yet no warning for anyone. Thats a malicious act if ever I saw one.

"Congratulations you just posted that you agree with the supposed overinflated covid death toll with your vaccine death argument. We test a person for covid and they go positive now it's a covid death, let's just ignore the fact they crashed a car or were drowning whilst trying to save their kid"

Another load of shit. Theres a big difference between a person shot to death and testing their cooling body with an inaccurate test, getting a positive covid result and havung a covid death.
VS
Testing/proving a dead person to see if their death had a contributing factor. The drowned swimmer drown due to the stroke causedby the vaxx spike protein damage.

In reality you are saying not use an incontrovertible test to prove possible causality against whats happened with covid. Insisting we test everyone with a suspect test to link everything to the narrative AND NOT question any part of it.

My way doesn't mean the person vaxx damaged is a vaxx death, it means we make sure its not. I.e. the dead person has a vax damaged heart that doesn't fail yet crashes his car due to being drunk then its not a vaxx death.

"goodscience.org and Peter "the messiah" McCullough. I wish they would atleast make it take me longer than 5 mins of searching the data they reference. I wouldn't waste my time in here if I wasn't able to do it so quickly"

So wheres the proof that their figures/analysis is incorrect?
 
I noticed you have avoided my point, you give a drug and have an adverse reaction/decline in your patient do you administer more?
First time in the history of medicine since the Nurenberg code was introduced that we have ever done something so obscene and plenty have paid the price for it in just Australia alone.

Also breaks the Hippocratic Oath. I'd argue that every medical personnel who is aware of the damage and yet continues to put shots in arms should have their license revoked and be permanently barred from practising medicine, along with being personally liable for the harm they've caused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mon
Back
Top