- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 18,108
- Reaction score
- 1,356
lol at Tibau insinuating that he's stopping the appeal because of money issues and not the fact that he's blatantly on gear and got caught red handed
EPO is not steroids. Not even close.
lol at Tibau insinuating that he's stopping the appeal because of money issues and not the fact that he's blatantly on gear and got caught red handed
Good riddance. Never understood keeping a guy on the under card for 25 fights.
Wouldn't be at all unheard of for a guy to be fighting at 35. But it might be hard for him to keep training at the level he has been without the fight income. I'd actually be sort of surprised if he didn't show up on a UFC card in Brazil, or in one of the Brazilian organizations once his suspension is up.So he's done for good basically?
I wonder if he didn't want the appeal to qualify as "aggravating circumstances", even though it would violate his due process among other things if an appeal by itself increased the suspension amount.
USADA isn't the government and the suspension is through the UFC, so I'm not sure how the appeal process works.I wouldn't think an appeal would count at "aggravated circumstances". You have a right to appeal any legal decision if you believe the results to be false. You just have to pony up all the money for that up front and it sounds like the hearing will costs more than the 3-6 months of time or one fight purse.
I was thinking it was an expense thing and that he may need to change careers altogether rather than age, but yeah.Wouldn't be at all unheard of for a guy to be fighting at 35. But it might be hard for him to keep training at the level he has been without the fight income. I'd actually be sort of surprised if he didn't show up on a UFC card in Brazil, or in one of the Brazilian organizations once his suspension is up.
That's why I brought it up, because administrative proceedings and rulings can do crazy things and aren't traditionally bound to the standard rules of procedure. Although Due Process still applies, so it's why I was questioning it.USADA isn't the government and the suspension is through the UFC, so I'm not sure how the appeal process works.
Yeah man, I was just thinking out loud I guess. Interesting case. I wonder if his appeal would require a lawyer.That's why I brought it up, because administrative proceedings and rulings can do crazy things and aren't traditionally bound to the standard rules of procedure. Although Due Process still applies, so it's why I was questioning it.
It's all good. I'm rolling the ideas around in my head as well. Legal representation isn't required for administrative hearings, but parties have the right to be represented. Also, I don't think a public defender would be appointed as the state wouldn't be obligated to provide legal counsel.Yeah man, I was just thinking out loud I guess. Interesting case. I wonder if his appeal would require a lawyer.
shocking tibau is 32, he's looks 40.Tibau is only 32 now, and his suspension should go into effect on the date of his positive test, if I'm not mistaken. So that would be from either 12/4/15 based on the initial "potential violation notice" or on 12/23/15 based on the other in-competition violation.
So if things go according to plan, he can fight again in December 2017, where he'll be 34. Not necessarily a career-ending suspension, but it hurts.
That's what I was thinking would make it expensive. I actually know a guy in CO who may possibly take the case pro bono lolIt's all good. I'm rolling the ideas around in my head as well. Legal representation isn't required for administrative hearings, but parties have the right to be represented. Also, I don't think a public defender would be appointed as the state wouldn't be obligated to provide legal counsel.
Is he bar certified in NV? I'm pretty sure that's the jurisdiction that the case would be held.That's what I was thinking would make it expensive. I actually know a guy in CO who may possibly take the case pro bono lol
Idk. I'll send him this link for lolsIs he bar certified in NV? I'm pretty sure that's the jurisdiction that the case would be held.
Denver Colorado. Or maybe Nevada?Is he bar certified in NV? I'm pretty sure that's the jurisdiction that the case would be held.
Well there we go. The only other place I could think it could go would be Florida, because that's the domicile of Tibau as far as I know. NV was just because I figured the NSAC would be the one levying the suspension since the fight happened in Sao Paulo.Denver Colorado.
Well, Tibau isn't appealing, so it's a moot discussion. Once he waives his right to appeal, I don't think he can revive it.Idk. I'll send him this link for lols
Well there we go. The only other place I could think it could go would be Florida, because that's the domicile of Tibau as far as I know. NV was just because I figured the NSAC would be the one levying the suspension since the fight happened in Sao Paulo.