Crime Get me Roger Stone (for obstruction, lying, and witness tampering) (SCO thread v. 28)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, there is, and I've stated it.
The simplest explanation by far is that they had people watching the residence.
I would be happy to look at a source, or to other outlets footage.

How would having someone watching his residence allow for them to be there and set-up an hour prior to the feds arrival? I guess I don't care enough to keep arguing it, but it seems more than suspect to me.
 
How would having someone watching his residence allow for them to be there and set-up an hour prior to the feds arrival? I guess I don't care enough to keep arguing it, but it seems more than suspect to me.
We've been over this.

Now I'll patiently explain it as if to a child.
The reporter was there both because they'd had the home staked out
-since the indictment has been in the pipe for months, and because Stone himself has stated that he expected to be indicted, hardly a stretch-
and since the reporter had seen activity at the relevant courthouse.

This really shouldn't be that hard for you and it makes me think you're wasting everyone's time by pretending to stupidity.
 
We've been over this.

Now I'll patiently explain it as if to a child.
The reporter was there both because they'd had the home staked out
-since the indictment has been in the pipe for months, and because Stone himself has stated that he expected to be indicted, hardly a stretch-
and since the reporter had seen activity at the relevant courthouse.

This really shouldn't be that hard for you and it makes me think you're wasting everyone's time by pretending to stupidity.

Do you think there was one guy there??? That one dude? Or are you trying to tell me they had a whole crew staged there for months or what?
They didn't set-up and film and light and report that arrest with one guy, one reporter who was "staked out" and jumped out with his iPhone and selfie recorded himself as they rolled up. That's my point. They were aware, and set-up, prior to the arrival of the feds. It's pretty simple.

Trust me, I also find the exchange here puzzling. We're just not on the same wavelength, I guess. No biggie.
 
RE: Tools

The special counsel’s indictment of Roger Stone contains no allegation of a conspiracy to collude with Russia or to steal emails from Democrats, and appears to undercut some of the logic behind Democrats’ collusion narrative....

...Robert Mueller accuses Stone, a longtime political operative, of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his communication with Trump campaign officials and other associates regarding WikiLeaks, which released emails that were stolen from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta....

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/25/stone-mueller-collusion-russia/
Except it does directly deal with Wikileaks and the emails . You could, you know read the indictment .

https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone

I'll spell it out so even your slow ass can follow

  • Pg1 para 3 describes Wikileaks as org 1
  • Pg 2 para 6 describes Stone confirming he has contact with Wikileaks
  • Pg 4 para 12 After the July 22 2016 DNC email dump, a senior tRUmp campaign official was directed to contact Stone about other damaging info org 1 had and future releases, Stone thereafter told the campaign about future releases of damaging material org 1 had
There in not even 4 pages of a 24 page indictment you have (layman term) collusion between a foreign entity and the tRUmp campaign plus Roger Stone to release damaging hacked electronic communications

How much more obtuse are you going to be over this?
 
Hannity with some good stuff. Amazing that CNN was there to capture this raid by FBI agents with assault rifles, magazines, even grenades. Sends a message to Trump supporters.

 
Yeah, sure, pal.
Again, you're not even addressing it .The indictment directly lays out coordinated effort between Stone/Wikileaks while Stone communicated to tRUmp campaign about the damaging hacked electronic communications . Doesn't get anymore clear than that
 
Mike Baker, former CIA covert ops guy was back on the JRE podcast the other day. He said something that totally made sense. Roegain asked him about the Mueller investigation and he said it's going nowhere. His reasoning for that opinion is that no one in Washington can keep their mouth shut. He's been in that environment for decades so his opinion is valid if you ask me.
 
Mike Baker, former CIA covert ops guy was back on the JRE podcast the other day. He said something that totally made sense. Roegain asked him about the Mueller investigation and he said it's going nowhere. His reasoning for that opinion is that no one in Washington can keep their mouth shut. He's been in that environment for decades so his opinion is valid if you ask me.
We have mountains of evidence regarding the Mueller teams ability to keep things hush right in front of us. Mike Baker is wrong, and plainly so. In fact, his assumption is borderline stupid for a guy with his background. He also thinks Mueller is on a witch hunt in other words...so.
 
We have mountains of evidence regarding the Mueller teams ability to keep things hush right in front of us. Mike Baker is wrong, and plainly so. In fact, his assumption is borderline stupid for a guy with his background. He also thinks Mueller is on a witch hunt in other words...so.

I'll be damned, it's Mueller himself right here on Sherdog.
 
Mike Baker, former CIA covert ops guy was back on the JRE podcast the other day. He said something that totally made sense. Roegain asked him about the Mueller investigation and he said it's going nowhere. His reasoning for that opinion is that no one in Washington can keep their mouth shut. He's been in that environment for decades so his opinion is valid if you ask me.
Sounds like this Mike Baker fool is projecting.
 
Trump is so busted guys! Except not. This is already old news. Trump done nothing wrong. Hill dog 2020!
 
I'll be damned, it's Mueller himself right here on Sherdog.
Or...you could just look at all the secrets we KNOW Mueller kept for months if not years and released in the form of indictment. How many "secrets" have to drop without anyone knowing them prior before the tin foilers drop the "if he knew something it would obviously leak" nonsense?
 
OK, but now by defending Mueller, we're pointing to the fact that several other folks might have been the ones who leaked it, right? NOT that CNN "just happened to be driving by in a few cars and trucks" and lucked into it, right? That is the part I find remarkable. That CNN wasn't fed the timing on this event ahead of time.
Why is it remarkable.

Leaks and Scoops have been part of journalism since journalism was born. Lying to protect sources or mis-direct so people cannot figure out who the source was goes hand in had with that.

This should be zero surprise and zero issue. Trumptards trying to make an issue of it are just being ridiculous. CNN had a scoop. Full stop.
 
RE: Tools

The special counsel’s indictment of Roger Stone contains no allegation of a conspiracy to collude with Russia or to steal emails from Democrats, and appears to undercut some of the logic behind Democrats’ collusion narrative....

...Robert Mueller accuses Stone, a longtime political operative, of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his communication with Trump campaign officials and other associates regarding WikiLeaks, which released emails that were stolen from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta....

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/25/stone-mueller-collusion-russia/

You do realize that Mueller does not have to spell out collusion at this time and can add additional indictments when ever he wants.
 
Hannity with some good stuff. Amazing that CNN was there to capture this raid by FBI agents with assault rifles, magazines, even grenades. Sends a message to Trump supporters.



OMG GUYS LETS FOCUS ON THE RAID AND NOT THE NEXT PERSON IN TRUMPS ORBIT TO DO SHADY SHIT.

God you guys really are easy to manipulate.

Sounds like Fox news is bitter they decided to not report on anything negative Trump and CNN is killing it with breaking stories.
 
Again, you're not even addressing it .The indictment directly lays out coordinated effort between Stone/Wikileaks while Stone communicated to tRUmp campaign about the damaging hacked electronic communications . Doesn't get anymore clear than that

NO COLUSION!! (sic)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top