Crime Get me Roger Stone (for obstruction, lying, and witness tampering) (SCO thread v. 28)

[trident]

Mike Baker, former CIA covert ops guy was back on the JRE podcast the other day. He said something that totally made sense. Roegain asked him about the Mueller investigation and he said it's going nowhere. His reasoning for that opinion is that no one in Washington can keep their mouth shut. He's been in that environment for decades so his opinion is valid if you ask me.

Mike Baker is a war profiteer surely experienced but as biased as they come. Talk about deep state lol. This guy has a history. Check it out.

 

[Michael Conley]

Roger Stone is uncomfortable to watch.

The constant blinking, the extended periods with his eyes shut, and licking at the air like a fucking lizard make me want to punch him square in the face.

 

[Andy Capp]

RE: Tools

The special counsel’s indictment of Roger Stone contains no allegation of a conspiracy to collude with Russia or to steal emails from Democrats, and appears to undercut some of the logic behind Democrats’ collusion narrative....

...Robert Mueller accuses Stone, a longtime political operative, of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his communication with Trump campaign officials and other associates regarding WikiLeaks, which released emails that were stolen from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta....
https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/25/stone-mueller-collusion-russia/

LOL @ daily caller source. Why don't you read the fucking indictment and see for yourself that this is bullshit?

 

[Andy Capp]

Hannity with some good stuff. Amazing that CNN was there to capture this raid by FBI agents with assault rifles, magazines, even grenades. Sends a message to Trump supporters.

First daily caller and now Faux News? Ahhhh ha ha ha ha

 

[InternetHero]

From what I have heard and read from good sources about Mr. Stone he is a really, really bad person, and if guilty of a crime I hope he is duly convicted.

Irregardless of partisan politics Roger Stone is rather despicable, and makes it a point to be despicable.

 

[abiG]

 

[MiniCraque]

You do realize that Mueller does not have to spell out collusion at this time and can add additional indictments when ever he wants.

In fact it would make no sense to indict anyone on those charges at this time. Doing so would show his hand and reveal his evidence before the investigation is over. Are people this ignorant on how criminal investigations work or are they under the impression Mueller is retarded?

Secondary charges are how he got Cohen to flip. He's saving the best for last.

Now there's no telling what "best" is, but still.

 

[FIMN]

Roger Stone is uncomfortable to watch.

The constant blinking, the extended periods with his eyes shut, and licking at the air like a fucking lizard make me want to punch him square in the face.

It's called cocaine.

 

[FIMN]

First daily caller and now Faux News? Ahhhh ha ha ha ha

Real media would be looking at Hillary's emails!

 

[Andy Capp]

The only people who believe this are too stupid the understand the indictment or too lazy to read it for themselves.

 

[abiG]

The only people who believe this are too stupid the understand the indictment or too lazy to read it for themselves.

Stop. You haven't read it, obviously! The seven counts were process crimes, no Russian collusion.

And LOL at CNN just happening to be there when not one local source knew anything.

 

[Last Samurai]

Roger Stone is uncomfortable to watch.

The constant blinking, the extended periods with his eyes shut, and licking at the air like a fucking lizard make me want to punch him square in the face.

It's called cocaine.

yep it's so obvious

 

[Andy Capp]

Stop. You haven't read it, obviously! The seven counts were process crimes, no Russian collusion.

And LOL at CNN just happening to be there when not one local source knew anything.

FFS I guess I have to repost this,

The full text of the indictment has been posted multiple times (in the previous thread).

Stone coordinated with Wikileaks on the timing of the release of the emails and he knew the source of the emails was Russian hackers. He communicated directly with them as well. Stone coordinated with the administration on the timing of the release of the emails. There has long been a prima facie case for Trump's campaign having a connection to the Russian election interference campaign. This makes it practically a slam dunk if the charges against Stone are proven in court.

Stone lied about the existence of records of his communications with other conspirators (for lack of a better term, pending results of judicial proceedings yet to take place) and with Wikileaks. He attempted to get other witnesses to also lie, i.e. witness tampering, which has to be one of the most serious offenses there is, if the justice system is to take itself seriously. And all of this appears to be in writing, in the form of texts, emails, and Twitter messages.

There are a total of 7 charges, of which lying in his testimony is perhaps the least serious. Of course, it's all accusation until proven in court, but if they have the evidence they claim to have (and why wouldn't they?) that won't be hard.

Anymore questions?

And anyway, using the Daily Caller and Faux News for sources is just destroys your credibility regardless of what I think.

 

[abiG]

Good one, I'm convinced.

 

[Andy Capp]

Good one, I'm convinced.

ROFL BUTTTTTTTT HILLARY!!!! HONEST TO FUCK THIS IS RELEVANT FOR SURE

Edit: oh yes, and I missed this BUTTTTT CNNNNNN

Stop. You haven't read it, obviously! The seven counts were process crimes, no Russian collusion.

And LOL at CNN just happening to be there when not one local source knew anything.

How does this response in any way refute the claim you're either too stupid to understand, or too lazy to read the indictment?

 

[7437]

Good one, I'm convinced.

Her emails, good point. Clearly this is a rock solid alibi for stone.

 

[abiG]

ROFL BUTTTTTTTT HILLARY!!!! HONEST TO FUCK THIS IS RELEVANT FOR SURE

Her emails, good point. Clearly this is a rock solid alibi for stone.

I am showing you actual evidence of collusion as opposed to the imagined evidence you and your ilk cling to.

 

[andnowweknow]

Stop. You haven't read it, obviously! The seven counts were process crimes, no Russian collusion.

And LOL at CNN just happening to be there when not one local source knew anything.

Why do you care how CNN found out about the raid? Just come out and say it whatever you're thinking because I can't tell if you're a lunatic or just a tin foil hat guy?

The Hillary stuff is just weird.

 

[Andy Capp]

Why do you care how CNN found out about the raid? Just come out and say it whatever you're thinking because I can't tell if you're a lunatic or just a tin foil hat guy?

The Hillary stuff is just weird.

Some people get their shit pushed in and they go yeah, my bad, and others just deflect. The latter is the more pathetic way to handle it imo.

 

[7437]

I am showing you actual evidence of collusion as opposed to the imagined evidence you and your ilk cling to.

If its evidence then why isnt Hillary in jail. Or being investigated.

Oh yeah, because its not evidence. It's a stupid attempt to change the subject for the rampant criminality of the trump administration.