Jones is superior to GSP in almost every metric. Its whether you value Fedors 10 year streak over Jones resume. imo Jones has faced consistently better competition and won so he gets the nod.
He never fought better competition because for one he fought at lhw and was clearly the largest there, he had an 84.5 reach, secondly the guys he fought like Shogun, Rampage, Lyoto etc in addition to being smaller had already had full careers in the much superior Pride FC so basically he was fighting smaller guys at the tail end of their careers.
Thirdly and most importantly he is a 2 time cheat to me this is the most damning, you can say what you want about Pride fighters but Jon was caught twice that's irrefutable so there is no way a clear cut cheat can be the greatest fighter the sport has ever seen IDGAF about how much money he's made for crooked UFC or the fan base he's a cheat period.
Finally imo he lost the first Gus fight and many people agreed until the UFC brass talked gullible people out of what they saw, I also clearly saw him lose to Reyes
yet the bias fan base insists he won that which is disgusting and he struggled badly with Santos which I thought was a draw. So he gets gifted decisions because he is popular and UFC created a myth that he was unbeatable which is BS.
Jon took the easiest fights at HW in Gane who is one-dimentional and I don't care what he was ranked at the time, UFC rankings are BS and based on politics
much of the time also the HW division must be bad if a guy was that bad of a ground game is #2. Then instead of facing the true number 1 contender in Aspinall he chooses Stipe who got KO'd 3 years ago absolutely pathetic. Everyone saying well he's past and now he's allowed to take it easy, sure he can without the belt and status of being HW champ.
I have way way more respect for Fedor and GSP for not being cheats, in Fedor's case he fought under much tougher conditions 10 minute rounds, kicks,stomps,knees to a grounded opponents also yellow cards where you lose 10% of your purse for inactivity which made fighters go for broke and led to more finishes, participating in GP's where you fight multiple times in a night also fought much larger opponents. Just about everyone he fought in Pride was ranked at the time the only true can he faced was Zulu but so what big deal Stipe also fought Maldonado who was a lhw and destroyed him which is fine.
Here's an interesting fact to ponder, during Pride's 10 year history they had many fighters on their roster some of which Anderson Silva, Chuck Liddell, Ricco,
Mirko, Big Nog, Wanderlei, Shogun, Rampage, Arona etc, all of the fighters that fought regularly meaning more than 3 times all lost at least once in Silva's case he had a 3-2 record this is one of the greatest UFC champs, I kept running through fighters who were in Pride and had 3 fights or more and the only fighter
who never suffered a defeat was Fedor all those other greats had far less fights but suffered losses or a loss that's how tough Pride was back then and a testament to Fedor's legitimacy.
Whenever I think of Fedor I only judge or grade him on the years from 2000-2008 because by the time of the Rogers fight he's done physically, I think it would be absurd to expect any fighter to still be in prime form nearly 10 years later but many hold Fedor to that ridiculous standard. I don't like Cain and thought he was overrated however by the time he fights Francis imo he was done physically and that loss had no effect on his legacy, I apply the same criteria as before with Fedor because its common sense and reality.