Social Gender ideology is dying, common sense prevailing

All that to say that a biological man can wear lipstick and believe he's a woman, despite not being one. LOL.

Crazy people exist. I agree. My mind is blown. Copy and paste more pseudo scientific slop from your subreddit, please.

He is unhinged in a fun way. This is what happens when they get in their echo chambers and ignore all reality.
 
This wildebeest successfully sued a female only nudity required Korean spa in Washington to accept pre-op trannys. They previously allowed POST-op tranny's - they just don't want dicks flopping around in a female only space.

Why TF don't you have a problem with that?


HavenWilvich.webp





Perfectly fine because the dads and moms have to accompany them there. This is a common thing with parents bringing their kids to public baths and spas in many cultures - Russian baths, Turkish spas, Korean spas.
The girl at the wi spa was accompanied by her mom too. So it’s perfectly fine?

You say public baths as if it’s not public NUDE spas with CHILDREN.

But again, it automatically becomes :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia if a trans person enters…..it’s nonsensical.

You’ve normalized it, but then you blame trans.
Stop acting like this is some kind of perverted practice - these things have existed since antiquity. It only became perverted when a bunch of trannys with dicks insisted on entering the female spaces.
Right, makes total sense for boys to be around swinging men’s dicks.
Some places require them to have the genitalia that matches like the place below. Some allow transwoman to go to the men's if they pass. Because people with vaginas aren't exactly threats. It's the tranny's with dicks in the female space that people have a problem with.


Right, trans men with beards, bald heads and filled with testosterone and muscles are totally acceptable and not a “threat”.

I’ve been consistent. Cover your shit up around other people. I don’t care who it is. Normalizing nudity around kids wasn’t done by trans activists. You support it to this day.
 
You have 2600 posts in about a year and a half. You need to get a life and go outside. Get some friends.

How many pages have you spent arguing that the sky is green to guys with working eyes telling you that it’s blue? Only terminally online people buy into the tranny nonsense. You sure there’s not a little bit of projection going on, buddy?
 
There is nothing else to discuss. You can make it seem as complicated as you want but you will always lose to the most basic kindergarten logic because this is not a complicated subject. This shit has been settled for decades, even centuries
We can safely say millenia on this one.
 
The girl at the wi spa was accompanied by her mom too. So it’s perfectly fine?

You seem to not even know WTF happened at Wi Spa. A biologically male transwoman named Darren Merager was walking around with a boner in the female-only nude part of Wi Spa in Los Angeles.

A women with her young daughter was at the spa that day and confronted the front desk in a video which went viral. This led to mass protests outside the spa.

A whole bunch of the trans advocate retards started physically assaulting a whole bunch of counter protesters because they massively outnumbered them. Too many incidents to count, but a whole bunch of them were caught on camera doing it.





Then it turned out that Darren Merager guy has a long history of sex crimes including exposing himself and masturbating and convicted of indecent exposure multiple time. As well as a felony conviction for robbery and assault.

The guy is a tranny and a pervert. And that's what you're defending.

snapshot_1500x1000px.jpg



You’ve normalized it, but then you blame trans.


Right, makes total sense for boys to be around swinging men’s dicks.

It's perfectly normal. These nude spas have existed for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's only recently where it has become an issue because tranny's want to go into the female space.

Right, trans men with beards, bald heads and filled with testosterone and muscles are totally acceptable and not a “threat”.

Yep because transmen don't typically go around and rape people. It's people with dicks that do that.

I’ve been consistent. Cover your shit up around other people. I don’t care who it is. Normalizing nudity around kids wasn’t done by trans activists. You support it to this day.

So you're free to not take your kids to these spas. Plenty of other parents (millions of them in fact, including entire countries where it is part of their culture feel it's perfectly fine and normal in same sex spaces. They just don't want dicks in the female space.
 
Last edited:
In fact, you have quite explicitly refused to address anything substantial. And you have nothing to offer in return.

It's very easy to call something "illogical" and "nonsense" to not have to address it, and avoid the issue entirely.

You're the one who offered nothing in return when I addressed your points logically.

You said sex and gender are two different things. Ok let's take that for a fact (even though it isn't because it's just a subjective definition we're talking about).

Sports, spas, female only spaces - that is all dependent on SEX. Why aren't you addressing that point?

All the issues society has with trans issues is that people like YOU keep CONFLATING SEX AND GENDER.
 
You're the one who offered nothing in return when I addressed your points logically.

You said sex and gender are two different things. Ok let's take that for a fact (even though it isn't because it's just a subjective definition we're talking about).

Sports, spas, female only spaces - that is all dependent on SEX. Why aren't you addressing that point?

All the issues society has with trans issues is that people like YOU keep CONFLATING SEX AND GENDER.

Don't talk to me.
 
Jennifer Aniston is infertile.
Anyone who is not a woman is a man (assumption of gender binarism and conflation of sex-gender).
Therefore, Jennifer Aniston is not a woman.
Therefore, Jennifer Aniston is a man.
giphy.gif
 
fK3GTcK.jpeg

Why are Magas so hot for their so called "Trannies"? It's like they can't get enough of they/them.



You're confused between two different groups here. They/them are the "non binary" folk. IE - socially awkward people on the spectrum with no social skills finding an excuse for their inability to fit in.

This entire topic is simple. It's a man who feels like a woman. An effeminate gay man. A woman who feels like a man. A lesbian with masculine traits. None of them end up with the "opposite" sex once they transition. No trans man ends up with a man and no trans woman ends up with a woman. They remain homosexual. It's extreme conversion therapy - They want to play a reverse gender role so they can claim to be in a heterosexual relationship.
 
You seem to not even know WTF happened at Wi Spa. A biologically male transwoman named Darren Merager was walking around with a boner in the female-only nude part of Wi Spa in Los Angeles.

A women with her young daughter was at the spa that day and confronted the front desk in a video which went viral. This led to mass protests outside the spa.

A whole bunch of the trans advocate retards started physically assaulting a whole bunch of counter protesters because they massively outnumbered them. Too many incidents to count, but a whole bunch of them were caught on camera ding it.





Then it turned out that Darren Merager guy has a long history of sex crimes including exposing himself and masturbating and convicted of indecent exposure multiple time. As well as a felony conviction for robbery and assault.

The guy is a tranny and a pervert. And that's what you're defending.

snapshot_1500x1000px.jpg

I’m not defending it you knucklehead. I’m criticizing the culture of nude spaces, especially ones that allow minors. YOU are defending allowing minors / kids in nude spaces with adults. While screaming pdf. It’s comical.
It's perfectly normal. These nude spas have existed for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's only recently where it has become an issue because tranny's want to go into the female space.
Right, because nudity between adults and kids is totally fine and never had a bad outcome until recently….derp….
Yep because transmen don't typically go around and rape people. It's people with dicks that do that.
So we totally should be cool with bearded bald tatted up test filled people with a towel covering their private parts in nude spaces around kids…..(the wi spa he/she would have been a non-issue if he/she just kept his legs together since he/she was wearing a towel…..)
So you're free to not take your kids to these spas. Plenty of other parents (millions of them in fact, including entire countries where it is part of their culture feel it's perfectly fine and normal in same sex spaces. They just don't want dicks in the female space.
I have never taken my kids to such a place and never will. It’s NOT perfectly fine, to me.

I don’t agree with the “culture” that promotes nude adults with kids. That said, IF you have that culture, and you want it integrated with “American” culture (for better or worse), you open the door for issues. Including the issue of what “side” does a legit trans person use.

Is it true that young children are allowed in either side with a parent?
 
You provide a definition of the term "woman" that corresponds to biological sex. I provided a definition that disambiguates between different concepts, including the biological sex concept and the gender concept, which is not the same.

Your argument is also badly formulated. Clearly, not all biological females produce eggs or can produce offspring, or else any biological female who was infertile would not be a woman.

So, reduction ad absurdum departing from the assumption that Jennifer Aniston is a woman:


1) A woman is an adult female.
2) A "female" refers to an individual that can bear or produce eggs, which can be fertilized by males.
3) A sterile individual with XX-Chromosomes and the phenotypical traits associated with females that is sterile cannot bear offspring or produce eggs that can be fertilized by males.
4) Therefore, sterile individuals with XX-chromosomes and the said traits cannot be an adult female.
5) Therefore, such individuals cannot be women.
6) Jennifer Aniston is infertile.
7) Anyone who is not a woman is a man (assumption of gender binarism and conflation of sex-gender).
8) Therefore, Jennifer Aniston is not a woman.
9) Therefore, Jennifer Aniston is a man.

Congratulations, you just provided an argument that in fact entails that all infertile biological females are, in fact, men.

Man:
\
of or denoting the sex that produces small, typically motile gametes, especially spermatozoa, with which a female may be fertilized or inseminated to produce offspring.


Jennifer Aniston cannot be a man.
 
Man:
\

of or denoting the sex that produces small, typically motile gametes, especially spermatozoa, with which a female may be fertilized or inseminated to produce offspring.

Jennifer Aniston cannot be a man.

So you're trying to tell me I'm not a man just because I'm sterile from decades of weed, mt dew and extra soy pop tarts while jerking off to tranny porn?

edit- nvm don't answer that
 
I was thinking 2 days ago..

If 100% of all these "trans" folks disappeared, how much would anyone care? Removing loved ones from the "snap," as to eliminate bias, I dont think people would mind. I'd wager the world would be happier.
Who would you care about?

Trans people would be happier overall if they weren’t trans as well.
 
Back
Top