- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 0
silva nuthuggers/zuffa zombies really putting there ignorance on display, huh?
LOL
youre an idiot.
silva nuthuggers/zuffa zombies really putting there ignorance on display, huh?
Ah, the myth of the K-1 striker. Seriously, this is just a bunch of hype. All you have to do is watch Anderson, and then go watch Mousasi fight, and it's painfully obvious who the better striker is. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out
silva nuthuggers/zuffa zombies really putting there ignorance on display, huh?
It's more about being a realist than anything. In the UFC the best fighters are tested against each other, so there is significantly more data to go off of. In other orgs fighters may look very good against weaker competition, but suggesting that they are good enough to compete against the elite of the elite is pure fanciful speculation.
Mousasi has looked good against subpar competition, whereas Anderson has absolutely dominated established competition.
this.
Mousasi won't be able to take Silva down because his wrestling isn't very good.
Mousasi won't beat Silva on the feet because his striking simply isn't up to par. I'm not basing this off of K-1 credentials, which say very little about MMA striking, I'm basing it off of seeing both of them in the cage and recognizing Anderson's complete superiority. Mousasi has faced subpar competition compared to Silva, and struggled significantly moreso.
I'm not saying Mousasi is a bad striker, but he is a ridiculously overrated one. It's understandable, though. When someone looks promising outside of the UFC, their skills tend to get completely blown out of proportion. The Gus fight is a good matchup for right now, and should be competitive.
It's more about being a realist than anything. In the UFC the best fighters are tested against each other, so there is significantly more data to go off of. In other orgs fighters may look very good against weaker competition, but suggesting that they are good enough to compete against the elite of the elite is pure fanciful speculation.
Mousasi has looked good against subpar competition, whereas Anderson has absolutely dominated established competition.
This.
Look what happened to Fedor when he stopped fighting Hongman Choi and Zulu. He went 1-3 in Strikeforce.
Same thing happened to Cro Cop, Nog, ect.
rofl
you guys obviously have never done stand up fighting in your lives
just because silva looks flashy with his dodges doesnt mean he is a better striker.
Mousasi won't be able to take Silva down because his wrestling isn't very good.
Mousasi won't beat Silva on the feet because his striking simply isn't up to par. I'm not basing this off of K-1 credentials, which say very little about MMA striking, I'm basing it off of seeing both of them in the cage and recognizing Anderson's complete superiority. Mousasi has faced subpar competition compared to Silva, and struggled significantly moreso.
I'm not saying Mousasi is a bad striker, but he is a ridiculously overrated one. It's understandable, though. When someone looks promising outside of the UFC, their skills tend to get completely blown out of proportion. The Gus fight is a good matchup for right now, and should be competitive.
Mousasi hypetrain never ceases to amaze me.
What? Fuck no. Mousasi's biggest wins are Hunt, Lombard, and Manhoef. The only impressive one of those is Lombard, who has looked fairly meh since joining the UFC.
I dont get the Mousasi hype at all.
Style wise gegard vs silva is better. Historical significance wise Gsp vs silva by a long mile.
id like to see gegard pass one test in the UFC before throwing him to the GOAT...
Another name in the "anderson is ducking" list.
In an earlier post, you refered to a K-1 striker being a "myth". Do you honestly not think that experience and success in kick boxking would come into play in a fight with Anderson Silva? Would you favor Silva over Mousasi in a straight kickboxing match?
how can anderson "duck" someone who's scheduled to fight someone else?
If he's such a good kickboxer, he should have been able to finish Jardine in R1. That was a slow old man version of Jardine too.
What's the point of being so "technical" if your slow gangly opponent makes it to the final bell, and you end up in a draw because of a single point deduction?