International Gaza children freezing to death amid Israeli blockade, warns UNRWA chief

The Commission reached the conclusion that the Mandate had become unworkable and must be abolishedin favour of partition, as the only solution to the Arab–Jewish "deadlock". It outlined ten points on: a Treaty system between the Arab and Jewish States and the new Mandatory Government; a Mandate for the Holy places; the frontiers; the need for Inter-State Subvention; the need for British Subvention; tariffs and ports; nationality; civil service; Industrial concessions; and the exchange of land and populations.[21]

WTH is this dribble. Has nothing to do with what I said.

Europeans took land directly from native Americans and murdered them and kicked them out. Jews worked a political and diplomatic process including buying land and had a footprint in the region for millenniums and was the ancestral home for the religion. Independent parties negotiated the partition plan. Not exactly the same. Not the same universe.

You said the Palestinians didn't "own" the land. Native Americans didn't "own" their land either.

Just because Western powers didn't codify a geographical area as a "nation" doesn't mean the indigenous people living there do not own the land.

They've been living there for hundreds of years. Hence, they own the land.

And no, they didn’t own the land. Nor did they have the right to prevent Jews from purchasing land. You’re trying to argue that by virtue of being a Muslim arab in the region you automatically had rights to land you didn’t live on or own?

Typical deceptive bullshit you do. The land some Jewish groups bought was PRIVATE land and a very small percentage relatively speaking.

The vast majority of the land allocated during the partition was public land state owned land. Previously controlled by the Ottoman Empire then taken over temporarily by the British after World War.

Stop conflating two completely different things.

And again, not only were they not a nation, they had no unifying identity prior to the Jewish movement.

Irrelevant. They were living there for hundreds of years.

The reality is the Arab / Muslim world wanted to keep the region Arab / Muslim. And again, they got double the non-desert land. And again, it wasn’t “their country”. The Arabs had their countries all around. This was ottoman land that the British controlled.

The entire region is Arab / Muslim. They dominate 95% of the population.

So they should be a-ok with recent immigrants flooding in and somehow getting awarded 55% of the land by the UN?

Not that ANY of this matters because Israel exists and EVERYONE needs to deal with it and move on. There’s literally zero benefit to re-litigating 1947. The only thing that matters is what to do now that Israel is here to stay. Waging war against them isn’t the best idea. Terrorism against them isn’t the best idea. Enabling and encouraging those who want to pursue those routes isn’t the best idea. The best idea is to make peace and have visions of what is in the best interests of all parties long term. It’s not to align with Iran…….

So going to keep ignoring why Israel is justified in continually stealing land in the West Bank?
 
WTH is this dribble. Has nothing to do with what I said.
lol. Yes, the commission at the time determining that a single state wasn’t feasible (because of the feelings of both Jews and Arabs) has nothing to do with you saying Arabs wanted a single state solution and that’s what your feelings say should have happened….
You said the Palestinians didn't "own" the land. Native Americans didn't "own" their land either.
Correct.
Just because Western powers didn't codify a geographical area as a "nation" doesn't mean the indigenous people living there do not own the land.
It also doesn’t mean no one had any right to settle there forever after. So, no, the indigenous didn’t own the entirety of the land. They shouldn’t have been eradicated from much of the land and murdered indiscriminately though. That’s not at all what happened in Israel.
They've been living there for hundreds of years. Hence, they own the land.
Jews were living there for thousands of years. Did they “own” the land when it was taken from them? And does that mean they still own the land?

So, no. The nomadic farmers didn’t own the entirety of the region.
Typical deceptive bullshit you do. The land some Jewish groups bought was PRIVATE land and a very small percentage relatively speaking.

The vast majority of the land allocated during the partition was public land state owned land. Previously controlled by the Ottoman Empire then taken over temporarily by the British after World War.

Stop conflating two completely different things.
I literally said it was ottoman land controlled by the british. It wasn’t land belonging to the Arabs.
Irrelevant. They were living there for hundreds of years.
And they were still living there - the partition didn’t kick them out.
So they should be a-ok with recent immigrants flooding in and somehow getting awarded 55% of the land by the UN?
The nation of Israel got 55% of the land, of which 60% was fuckin desert, despite having 56% of the population. The Arab nation got double the non-desert land.

Arab / Muslims control 99% of the entire region.
So going to keep ignoring why Israel is justified in continually stealing land in the West Bank?
you still didn’t respond to my comments on the West Bank. But again, the West Bank is disputed territory. It was controlled by Jordan prior to the war that they lost. Of course Jordan stripped the Palestinian people of citizenship in the 80s. But Jordan is cool with you….

Note: “the state of Israel quotes the UN that only territories captured in war from "an established and recognized sovereign" are considered occupied territories.”.
 
The war started because the Jews were somehow "awarded" 55% of the land. Not 30%.

Quit being purposely obtuse.

The jews got a huge slice of desert in the south, most of the fertile land was awarded to Arabs, but that still wasn't enough for them. Subsequent history of Arab conquest of Africa and beyond makes this even more clear.
 
I dismissed it because it's rated as biased under MediaFactCheck Bias and headed by an Orthodox Hasidic organization.

That's not being racist. That's common sense.

It's like expecting a vegan website to be unbiased about the dangers of eating meat.
No you didn’t. You plainly dismissed it because “Israelis”

It’s in your words in your posts.

Liar.
Racist
Hypocrite
 
Last edited:
So no foreign press? Israel supposed to be the example of democracy lmfao
Have you replied to the wrong post?

lol at the retard liking your obvious mistake here

Again shows the retard lemming herd mentality of the racist antisemites

“he’s on my team so like his post even though it makes no logical sense”
 
they should have displaced as many people as possible to ensure religious purity for each nation...............
“arggghghghggghghhhghhghhg ethnostate, ethnostate, ETHNOSTAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTEEEEEE!”
 
No you didn’t. You plainly dismissed it because “Israelis”

It’s in your words in your posts.

Liar.
Racist
Hypocrite

Nice made up fan fiction.

You criticize Israel so you're racist! This stupid ass shaming tactic doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
Have you replied to the wrong post?
No, I haven’t received a satisfactory answer from the pro Nazi side here.

lol at the retard liking your obvious mistake here

Again shows the retard lemming herd mentality of the racist antisemites

“he’s on my team so like his post even though it makes no logical sense”
 
The hostages Is just an excuse to keep leveling Gaza at this point for Israel. They are thirsty for more destruction. You can see in the latest actions how far they are willing to go.


I don't really see the problem with what Israel is doing. The Arabs said they wanted more war and violence, the jews said we accept your terms and gave it to them. Why should the jews stop waging war if the Palestinians aren't offering up the desired peace terms ?

If I tried to stab you and you beat my ass but every time you let me up again I try to stab you some more would you not be justified in continuing to beat me up ? I tried to stab you and made it clear my intent is to stab you...why should you just have to wait for me to stab you again just because you are the better fighter ?
 
I don't really see the problem with what Israel is doing. The Arabs said they wanted more war and violence, the jews said we accept your terms and gave it to them. Why should the jews stop waging war if the Palestinians aren't offering up the desired peace terms ?

If I tried to stab you and you beat my ass but every time you let me up again I try to stab you some more would you not be justified in continuing to beat me up ? I tried to stab you and made it clear my intent is to stab you...why should you just have to wait for me to stab you again just because you are the better fighter ?
Well there are these folks called civilians, many of whom are children. It seems mighty questionable to target them for minimal gain. Not to mention Israel's previous attempts to brutalized populations into submissions have historically backfired.
 
Nice made up fan fiction.

You criticize Israel so you're racist! This stupid ass shaming tactic doesn't work.
You are the only one lying here

It's in black and white in your own words in this thread

The fan fiction comment doesn't even make sense in this contact

I misjudged you. You really are not very clever.
 
No, I haven’t received a satisfactory answer from the pro Nazi side here.
That would be the jew hater, hamas lovers right? As they are the ones with views aligned to the nazis? Or are you another abhorrent gaslighting individual.

Deliberate lack of question mark.
 
Well there are these folks called civilians, many of whom are children. It seems mighty questionable to target them for minimal gain. Not to mention Israel's previous attempts to brutalized populations into submissions have historically backfired.
They aren't being targeted

But then the pro terrorist side has no qualms with lying
 
They aren't being targeted

But then the pro terrorist side has no qualms with lying
So they aren't being targeted but we have copious instances of Israel purposefully targeting non-combatants and no guilty parties being punished, a chorus of international aid groups complaining that Israel is purposefully delaying aid to civilians, and Israel loosening the rules of engagement even though it kills more civilians, yet Israel isn't targeting civilians you claim?

Do you have a bridge to sell too?
 
That would be the jew hater, hamas lovers right? As they are the ones with views aligned to the nazis? Or are you another abhorrent gaslighting individual.

Deliberate lack of question mark.
nazis were famously anti-racism and anti-genocide.
 
If I tried to stab you and you beat my ass but every time you let me up again I try to stab you some more would you not be justified in continuing to beat me up ? I tried to stab you and made it clear my intent is to stab you...why should you just have to wait for me to stab you again just because you are the better fighter ?
It’s more like me and my 6 buddies are out at a bar and one of them picks a fight with you, so you kick his was and then smack the other 5 of us around too. Every time he gets up and swings we all take a beating from you.

There are 5 of us who haven’t done shit who are taking a whipping bc friend 6 keeps knuckling up.
They aren't being targeted
Conservative figures show that more than 6,000 women and 11,000 children were killed in Gaza by the Israeli military over the last 12 months. (Data from September, 2024)

If that’s not targeted then maybe they should be focusing more on their aim.
 
Back
Top