- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 62,004
- Reaction score
- 26,810
I've asked you several times to clarify your reasoning. I've tried to divine it. The only other possible reasoning on your part I could deduce from what you wrote was that GCN aged well because it endured for so long, but that is also faulty because:I don't even know why I try with you. You'd argue the sun isn't yellow just to be "right"
- My specific "Fine Wine" post showed the remarkable improvement of the RX 480/580 over their lifespans, which are identical cards on GCN 4.0 with the latter more aggressively clocked, and which launched a mere 10 months apart.
- If GCN were monolithic, as you wrongly believe, and its age accounted for its driver improvements, then the RX 580 should have already been perfected at launch, since that came 6 years and 3 months after GCN debuted.
- Presuming your assumption is RDNA won't endure as long as GCN, you don't know how long AMD will implement RDNA. We only have their roadmap through 2022 which promises RDNA 3.0.
You can persist in flinging impotent ad hominem, or you can admit you forwarded a claim that for whatever reason you believed to be valid, yet isn't logical.