Elections GA already did two audits!!! RHEEEEE

[Dr Curtis Love]

Except that I am not MAGA you dumb ass. I am Libertarian, Conservative, Constitutionalist. You categorize anyone that exposes the Democratic Party as corrupt and authoritarian as MAGA.

You are a true Left Cult believer. You can't think for yourself. You have to be told what to think and then you repeat it like a good little runt.

Lol that's right, "Im not MAGAt, but I'm going to rush in and defend dear leader whenever anyone besmirches his name!" Yeah dude, we all believe you LMAO. Just admit it you chickenshit. Have some conviction, I know you're a MAGAt and that's a hard word to understand, so look it up and admit it.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Eh, who cares who posted the sworn testimony and got eyes on it? Why does that matter to ya?

I'm far more concerned over which large news orgs will inevitably refuse to publish this testimony.

But they should only publish it if it's legit and believable and likely to make a difference, and not the testimony of a disgruntled outlier, right?

Rando accounts on Twitter and YouTube tend to pretend everything they think is national newsworthy, that's how they make money.

 

[High Test With da Best]

But they should only publish it if it's legit and believable and likely to make a difference, and not the testimony of a disgruntled outlier, right?

Rando accounts on Twitter and YouTube tend to pretend everything they think is national newsworthy, that's how they make money.

Yes fully agree whether it's an indy or an established org.

Except for the believable part. Sure things can and should be vetted but sometimes that takes years and discretion of courts and money blah blah, if it's sworn testimony by an official on a relevant topic it should be heard since that person is likely risking prosecution if proven false

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Yes fully agree whether it's an indy or an established org.

Except for the believable part. Sure things can and should be vetted but sometimes that takes years and discretion of courts and money blah blah, if it's sworn testimony by an official on a relevant topic it should be heard since that person is likely risking prosecution if proven false

I'd rather see the story develop myself, and if that takes years, yeah that's unfortunate - but a lot of time and effort has already been spent on this story, and it hasn't really got anywhere.

Seems logical to park it until something significant happens.

 

[High Test With da Best]

I'd rather see the story develop myself, and if that takes years, yeah that's unfortunate - but a lot of time and effort has already been spent on this story, and it hasn't really got anywhere.

Seems logical to park it until something significant happens.

Yeah it's odd; I can't imagine this was an exclusive scoop by an indy X'er, I'd rather know how it became public originally and by whom; FOIA maybe? And was it originally intended to he public but someone was suppressing it? Who/why? Or was it intended to be private and has now been leaked? If so by whom and why? And again if so why was it private originally?

Also odd after so much publicity and checking into this that it hadn't already seen the light of day.

Not gonna pretend I have any answers to those queries but my main point was that more info is never a bad thing regardless of who gets credit for publicizing it.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yeah it's odd; I can't imagine this was an exclusive scoop by an indy X'er, I'd rather know how it became public originally and by whom; FOIA maybe? And was it originally intended to he public but someone was suppressing it? Who/why? Or was it intended to be private and has now been leaked? If so by whom and why? And again if so why was it private originally?

Also odd after so much publicity and checking into this that it hadn't already seen the light of day.

Not gonna pretend I have any answers to those queries but my main point was that more info is never a bad thing regardless of who gets credit for publicizing it.

Unless its origin cannot be verified and it may have been altered.

 

[Witchhunt]

Unless its origin cannot be verified and it may have been altered.

Like a mail-in ballot…

 

[AWilder]

Official Video Testimony: NO Signature Verification Occurred in Fulton County, Georgia in 2020 - NO Chain of Custody​

MSN

No signature verification was done in 2020 in Fulton County, election board member testifies

Mark Wingate, who served on the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, testified on Monday that there was no ...

trib247.com

Video: Election fraud exposed in Georgia: Reports

Mark Wingate testified that he voted against the certification of the 2020 election due to concerns regarding the integrity of the election.

americanmilitarynews.com

Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, recently testified that he voted against the certification of the 2020 presidential election due to concerns he had regarding the integrity of the election. The Elections Board member claimed that Fulton County failed to verify the signatures of over 147,000 mail-in ballots.

Independent journalist known on X, formerly Twitter, as “Kanekoa The Great” shared a video Monday Wingate’s testimony. The journalist explained that the Fulton County Elections Board member’s testimony was part of a disbarment hearing for Jeffrey Clark, a former United States assistant attorney general. Clark is one of the 19 defendants charged by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis for allegedly engaging in attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.



CLIFF NOTES:

In the disbarment hearings in Georgia it was finally able to come out that Fulton County, Georgia failed to follow the law in significant ways, yet still certified the election ignoring the law.

THE DEMOCRATS IGNORED THE LAW IN THE 2020 ELECTIONS and got away with it.

There was.....

• No Signature Verification - Required by Law
• No Chain of Custody
• No videos provided of the 16 drop boxes when requested. Not even a sample. - Required By Law

Even though they ignored the law, the Democrats are now trying to disbar and attack a lawyer that tried to expose it. Fulton County's election results can not be trusted by anyone. It was not a secure or credible election.

So the GOP people who ran the election failed to do their job and this is the fault of Democrats? Lmao, clown world indeed

 

[SurferH2O]

So the GOP people who ran the election failed to do their job and this is the fault of Democrats? Lmao, clown world indeed

No dummy. This is only in Fulton County, run by Democrats. You're welcome.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots? Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

 

[AWilder]

No dummy. This is only in Fulton County, run by Democrats. You're welcome.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots? Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

Brad Raffensperger - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The buck stops here bucko.

 

[SurferH2O]

Brad Raffensperger - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The buck stops here bucko.

You didn't watch the testimony or read the articles. You don't even know what you are babbling about.

This is Fulton County where the Democrats voted 3 to certify the election, against 2 Republicans that said to not, because they showed there was no signature verification, no videos of the drop boxes as required. The Democrats voted to certify, even though the election was not safe, trustworthy, and secure as promised.

Can you answer the questions?

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

 

[AWilder]

You didn't watch the testimony or read the articles. You don't even know what you are babbling about.

This is Fulton County where the Democrats voted 3 to certify the election, against 2 Republicans that said to not, because they showed there was no signature verification, no videos of the drop boxes as required. The Democrats voted to certify, even though the election was not safe, trustworthy, and secure as promised.

Can you answer the questions?

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

Lmao you sad little dorks getting your hopes up for "Kanekoa The Great" most famous as a qanon influencer. Lol

 

[Lucas1980]

You didn't watch the testimony or read the articles. You don't even know what you are babbling about.

This is Fulton County where the Democrats voted 3 to certify the election, against 2 Republicans that said to not, because they showed there was no signature verification, no videos of the drop boxes as required. The Democrats voted to certify, even though the election was not safe, trustworthy, and secure as promised.

Can you answer the questions?

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

In North Georgia when we see Fulton County Tags we cringe... They're always the biggest assholes so it doesn't surprise me how the majority of them vote

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Lmao you sad little dorks getting your hopes up for "Kanekoa The Great" most famous as a qanon influencer. Lol

Even Trump didn't believe this shit, but there are people still trying to prove Trump's preference that he didn't lose was based in fact.

He literally said "find the votes" knowing that they weren't there and would have to be sought out creatively, and all of his team have dropped this garbage and admitted they were lying lol

 

[SurferH2O]

Lmao you sad little dorks getting your hopes up for "Kanekoa The Great" most famous as a qanon influencer. Lol

Look at you dodge and then throw dirt in the air. What he shared was direct official testimony. You can't answer the questions and it's funny.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

 

[SurferH2O]

Even Trump didn't believe this shit, but there are people still trying to prove Trump's preference that he didn't lose was based in fact.

He literally said "find the votes" knowing that they weren't there and would have to be sought out creatively, and all of his team have dropped this garbage and admitted they were lying lol

That is not what we are discussing. You Left Cult types have Trump on the brain and it's pathetic.

We are discussing a man being disbarred and imprisoned because he pointed out that the Fulton County elections did not follow the law, were not secure and cannot be trusted. We are discussing how Fulton County, Georgia will proceed with elections in the future so that the citizens can have confidence in the results. 2020 is done. We are looking at a man's livelihood and freedom at stake because the Democrats refuse to follow the law and they are also going full authoritarian attacking him, because he exposed them. Did you even read the story or watch the video provided? So you even know the man's name?

 

[Deleted member 585708]

That is not what we are discussing. You Left Cult types have Trump on the brain and it's pathetic.

We are discussing a man being disbarred and imprisoned because he pointed out that the Fulton County elections did not follow the law, were not secure and cannot be trusted. We are discussing how Fulton County, Georgia will proceed with elections in the future so that the citizens can have confidence in the results. 2020 is done. We are looking at a man's livelihood and freedom at stake because the Democrats refuse to follow the law and they are also going full authoritarian attacking him, because he exposed them. Did you even read the story or watch the video provided? So you even know the man's name?

So angry - this is like the 50th furious post you've made in the last 24 hours

It's like you've contracted that Rage virus from 28 Days Later - a proper mind virus lol

Awaits "I'm not angry at all, it's just---"

 

[SurferH2O]

So angry - this is like the 50th furious post you've made in the last 24 hours

It's like you've contracted that Rage virus from 28 Days Later - a proper mind virus lol

Awaits "I'm not angry at all, it's just---"

Furious? ROFL! I am laughing at you Left Cult types. You can't answer simple questions and refuse to view evidence that exposes what really happened.

Let's try again.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Furious? ROFL! I am laughing at you Left Cult types. You can't answer simple questions and refuse to view evidence that exposes what really happened.

Let's try again.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

Bro, one guy is making that claim. He has been claiming the election shouldn't have been certified for 4 years. But now that he's said so in DC, you want to shit your knickers because Krakatoa The Grift told you to?

Come on, man, this is silly.

 

[AWilder]

Look at you dodge and then throw dirt in the air. What he shared was direct official testimony. You can't answer the questions and it's funny.

Are you alright that they didn't signature match, didn't provide videos of the drop boxes, and didn't have chain of custody on their ballots?

Are you alright with an election that is not secure, verifiable, and trusted by the citizens?

This one guy is saying they didn't verify signatures, which is wrong. He's lying or very stupid, probably both. Signatures were verified 3 times during the normal count and after both audits. This guy is a clown. The Republican run GA election was audited multiple times and all of these dumbass claims have been addressed. This is just maga trying to muddy the waters with disingenuous claims.