- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 30,089
- Reaction score
- 5,350
This isn't a debate and I don't need you to take me seriously.
It's a fact no significant fraud has been presented, let alone fraud that would be prevented by identification. It's also a fact that the black community happens to have less ID. If there isn't fraud why increase security? And why vote against Democrat fraud bills only to insist these ones are necessary? And why implement this in concert with all those other changes to voting that clearly have the greatest effect on the black vote?
There are a lot of frivolous claims of racism but this isn't one of them.
I'm all for election security but this isn't that. Republicans across the country were saying these elections were secure until Trump went nuclear and started campaigning against anyone that said so. Several refused to lie and stuck to their guns, and lost positions and employment as a result, everything about this screams lies and corruption, and it's clever, masquerading election tampering as election security.
I know there's nothing I can say or show you that will convince you, but everything I'm saying is true. They haven't presented significant fraud that can be prevented with identification, they refused to support Democrat election security bills, and every single change they're putting in place hurts the black vote.
You can believe otherwise, but if you're going to say it, you should prove it. 2020 had a record turnout for voters, the Republicans were crushed, and their response is to suppress the black vote.
Can you supply actual stats to show blacks have less idI'd.
I can't think of a single black person that I've ever known that didn't have an id - and in most cases; Georgia for instance, a utility bill can be used in place of photo id for voting purposes.