- Joined
- Oct 12, 2003
- Messages
- 15,865
- Reaction score
- 72
I am ON that Trump War Wagon and am going to vote for him in the Texas Primaries.
Open primaries FTW! Get hype!
Open primaries FTW! Get hype!
Did he actually say that?
a Twitter battle is like a WW1 battle. nothing is accomplished and both sides look like shit.
Good for Trump.
Don't take $hit from anyone...especially paid shills on the worst "news" network in the history of man.
Any guy who bullies women, gets my vote.
Not yet.Did he actually say that?
I didn't say anything about Fox creating "the modern conservative movement". You really suck at reading. I talked explicitly about Fox doing nativist rabble rousing. It's no secret that Fox has played to the "tea party". If you're just going to post non-sequiturs unrelated to what has been posted please don't quote my comments within yours.Oh I didn't make your Frankenstein analogy seriously. Like most dumbass liberals, you think that Fox News created the conservative movement, even though it was more the opposite case. Fox News didn't show up until 1996, when the conservative movement was already long in the tooth. Same with Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter.
Those guys didn't have anything to do with creating the modern conservative movement.
Yes, because O'Reilly and Fox (and the GOP generally) have worked hard to rouse the sort of sentiment represented by Trump's 26-30%. They have used those strong sentiments and vocal minority to attempt to oppose policy and sway elections. Now they have to try to regain control. History suggests that doing so is challenging to say the least.Oh, there's helluva lot more than that. Watch, you'll eventually see even O'Reilly turn against Trump's views on immigration and he's been trying to play it both ways with Trump up until now.
Fox News has political ties to the GOP, which isn't a surprise to anyone. But what was surprising is that they're specifically siding with establishment candidates, and attacking other candidates they precieve as threats to the token establishment candidate.
Jeb Bush, is unquestionably the establishment candidate for this Presidential Cycle.
Which explains why Trump was getting targeted questions during the debate, and Jeb was getting softball questions. Jeb have bullshit answers about commoncore, which weren't followed up on (compare that to Chris Wallace's interrogation question to Trump's evidence about the Mexican Government sending over their less desirable citizens to leech off of us).
Saying Trump is a plant implies three things. One, he's the Clinton's bitch in this situation, and who has Trump ever been a bitch for in all his life? Two, his desire for the Republican Party nomination is just a waste of time, and he's going 3rd party anyway. Three, Clinton is going to get the nomination, and even months ago before the Email scandal blew up in the news, it was foreseeable that she wasn't going to get close.
'But... but...but... what what about the phone call?' How convienient that came out from the Clinton camp just a day before the debate, and who does it benefit? Which political family is close to the Clintons?
I'm asking you this because I credit you can figure this out.
Here's who I want to moderate the next GOP debate.
This is the idea i had too. Let partisan people from the other party moderate.
But this is exactly the type of thinking a typical politician would do. Perhaps the reason he is resonating with a certain portion of American's is that he's not pandering to anyone or isn't trying not to step on toes. I doubt he becomes president, but to be honest its kind of a breath of fresh air a midst piles of horse shit.
Somebody has a crush