- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 31,681
- Reaction score
- 84,763
I mean, that's such an obviously dumb and hackish theory that it feels weird even addressing it like I'm talking to an adult, but what's your evidence? I'm assuming you're defining "Soros-funded DA" as anyone who is an elected DA who received a campaign donation (of any size?) from a group that Soros has donated to, right? That's already dishonest, as DAs are actually funded by the gov't. But OK, put that aside. So to make the case that them winning elections correlates with higher crime rates (which is still a couple of steps from your claim), you'd want to look at comparable places that didn't have "Soros-funded DAs" and the before-and-after rates. I'm not aware of any attempt to do that (anyone who thinks seriously like that wouldn't take the claim seriously enough to check in the first place). But we do know that there's no partisan connection there.
You can read. You can write. But, damn... are you're one ignorant goof.
Soros Dumps Another $2.5 Million into George Gascón’s Race for Los Angeles DA
https://californiaglobe.com/article...million-into-gascons-race-for-los-angeles-da/
He also dumped..... well... from the story.... "In 2018, billionaire oligarch George Soros funded the campaigns of leftist District Attorney challengers across the United States. In California alone, Soros spent $3,625,000 on DA races in Sacramento, San Diego, Alameda, Marin and Contra Costa counties."
Perhaps you're ignorant on purpose? Do you want to talk about the rest of the nation and Soros funding DAs elsewhere?