- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 31,681
- Reaction score
- 84,748
I think that instead of knee-jerking childish attacks, you should try to understand that post.
No moved posts. Here's what I said:
I'm assuming you're defining "Soros-funded DA" as anyone who is an elected DA who received a campaign donation (of any size?) from a group that Soros has donated to, right? That's already dishonest, as DAs are actually funded by the gov't. But OK, put that aside. So to make the case that them winning elections correlates with higher crime rates (which is still a couple of steps from your claim), you'd want to look at comparable places that didn't have "Soros-funded DAs" and the before-and-after rates. I'm not aware of any attempt to do that (anyone who thinks seriously like that wouldn't take the claim seriously enough to check in the first place). But we do know that there's no partisan connection there.
It was in response to this: "Senseless crime is absolutely caused by Soros funded DAs."
But all you're willing to defend is that Soros has donated to DA campaigns.
Donating MILLIONS to a campaign is what I shared. Here you are playing stupid again. You've been owned. Keep babbling you goof.