- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Basically Jack wants to ignore how they got their job by millions of Soros's $$$$$$ and focus on their paycheck from the government. That's disingenuous as fuck. Next, Jack wants to say, you can't prove the crime rates are impacted. Is that now your current position Jack?
Well, I (and I give you permission, just in this thread, to address me directly, as long as you are polite) just believe in telling the truth and not making claims that are not accurate. If your claim that Soros-funded DAs cause crime were true, it would actually be apparent in the data. Also, DAs are funded by the gov't. Not just their checks, but their operating budgets, staffs, offices, equipment, etc.
Believing crime in our cities has not went ballistic since the "soft on crime" DAs have taken over is a joke.
There was a spike in crime all over the country (regardless of who was contributing to DA campaigns) in 2020. It was in rural and urban areas, Republican and Democratic places, etc. The assertion that it was caused by one donor to some DA races is not plausible on its face, and if you dig deeper, it doesn't hold up. It's not even something a serious person would claim.
Last edited: