Elections For Canadians (and sure, Americans and others can chime in): Is this a good reason to vote Liberal in the upcoming Canada election?

rikibobby said:
Well if he falls short he can just use Carney's "quantitative easing". You know, print more money. That's totally accepted in Canada. Liberals love that shit.
Click to expand...
So, your response is what about Carney?
giphy.gif
 
Andy Capp said:
So, your response is what about Carney?
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
I'm just using his terminology.

If the Liberals campaigned on raising taxes to all-time highest levels of revenue while spending so obscenely that they double the country's debt to date since inception, would you have voted for them? I think the "budgets balance themselves" was the correct route.

Harper was stupid though to point out exactly what the liberals would do and was demonized for it. He was bang-on. What a shit leader.
 
jimjamjammer said:
It's sad how quickly these folks are gobbling up Carney's dick without thinking twice, or at all for that matter.
Click to expand...
well to be fair, male genitalia is usually the first thing on these peoples minds
Andy Capp said:
lol project a little harder--they can't see you in space.

Get back to me when you actually understand the differences among statements of fact, opinion, and suggesting possible courses of action in the event of possible future events. Meantime, you're just a liar to me and not worth a fuck.

Now, go cry to your mommy about the mean man on sherdog and ask her why she didn't teach you this simple shit.
Click to expand...
I understand better than you do that is for sure, just because you are a deranged pansy, it doesn't make clear cut reality an opinion.

You have yet to point out how any facts I have presented are wrong, you haven't articulated why you disagree with any of my opinions with anything other than insults. If you want to have a rational discussion that's fine, but you need to stop being full of shit first. It's okay to have different opinions, it's a fools game to pretend you have all the answers and just dismiss everything of any difference.

I don't think you are a mean man, I think you are an incompetent child and I find it amusing how every response from you is so predictable.
 
Blanchet:

Fielding another query about the newly released Conservative platform, he accused it of “hocus pocus,” and said, “Elon Musk, sors de ce corps,” likening the Conservatives' cuts to the controversial DOGE initiative south of the border (the rhyme does not quite translate smoothly into English, but it is effectively an exorcist's chant urging the American billionaire to leave a body).
 
the conservative platform has been out for 5 minutes and Andy is somehow an expert on it, he surely didn't just gather his understanding of it from websites that confirmed his bias like he accused me of, he would never act in a hypocritical manner
 
rikibobby said:
I'm just using his terminology.

If the Liberals campaigned on raising taxes to all-time highest levels of revenue while spending so obscenely that they double the country's debt to date since inception, would you have voted for them? I think the "budgets balance themselves" was the correct route.

Harper was stupid though to point out exactly what the liberals would do and was demonized for it. He was bang-on. What a shit leader.
Click to expand...
I agree with your assessment of Harper. He's a fucking traitor. When Trump forced renegotiating NAFTA during his first term, Harper was in the US badmouthing the Canadian team. He can fuck right off back to the US and stay there.

Lycandroid said:
well to be fair, male genitalia is usually the first thing on these peoples minds

I understand better than you do that is for sure, just because you are a deranged pansy, it doesn't make clear cut reality an opinion.

You have yet to point out how any facts I have presented are wrong, you haven't articulated why you disagree with any of my opinions with anything other than insults. If you want to have a rational discussion that's fine, but you need to stop being full of shit first. It's okay to have different opinions, it's a fools game to pretend you have all the answers and just dismiss everything of any difference.

I don't think you are a mean man, I think you are an incompetent child and I find it amusing how every response from you is so predictable.
Click to expand...
Listen, bitch tits. You didn't present any facts. The sources you quoted don't present any facts. You mewled about LIBZ BAD and spewed ad hominem like you are doing in this post, and didn't even understand what your sources were saying. LOL @ "if I want to have a rational discussion". Do I have to remind you again of what started this idiotic exchange, retard?
 
Lycandroid said:
the conservative platform has been out for 5 minutes and Andy is somehow an expert on it, he surely didn't just gather his understanding of it from websites that confirmed his bias like he accused me of, he would never act in a hypocritical manner
Click to expand...

Between taking selfies at "work" and eating blueberry preserves...he's got a lot of free time
 
rikibobby said:
It's been the same platform with a couple of minor tweaks for months some and years for most elements. It was no secret. The costing is excellent in comparison with the Liberals.
Click to expand...
The costing is inaccurate. I’ll go with the economics guy rather than the down to earth guy who thought electricians capture lightning as part of their craft.
 
JudoThrowFiasco said:
Between taking selfies at "work" and eating blueberry preserves...he's got a lot of free time
Click to expand...
God I hope he is just trolling us all. What a depressing know-it-all douche to have to be around for his family or co-workers.
 
Andy Capp said:
Listen, bitch tits. You didn't present any facts. The sources you quoted don't present any facts. You mewled about LIBZ BAD and spewed ad hominem like you are doing in this post, and didn't even understand what your sources were saying. LOL @ "if I want to have a rational discussion". Do I have to remind you again of what started this idiotic exchange, retard?
Click to expand...
Lets get the facts straight here

I am in phenomenal shape.

I didn't put forth any attacks until you did.

Also which account is it that you are accusing me of having as a double account ?
 
Lycandroid said:
Lets get the facts straight here

I am in phenomenal shape.

I didn't put forth any attacks until you did.

Also which account is it that you are accusing me of having as a double account ?
Click to expand...
<36>
We already had this talk and you side-stepped it. And it's only been a fucking week LOL

Andy Capp said:
lol



So, yeah, I kicked that arse so bad the account has no posts since this one,
Andy Capp

International Post in thread 'Measles Resurgence in America (2025)'

UberHere said:
Have you ever heard of something called herd immunity. You get enough unvaccinated people into one locality and outbreaks happen: just like what we’re seeing in the news. Not to mention immunocompromised people are always at risk.

You and your butt buddy @Crazy Source are insufferable. I don’t even know why you dip shits even post here.
Click to expand...
{<jordan}

What do you think I was talking about when I said, "If and only if your domestic population has a high vaccination rate, then unvaccinated people coming into the country by any method whatsoever only pose a risk to each...

Decided to focus on this account, did you? It didn't help the post quality, son. Take a rest and go touch some grass.
Click to expand...
 
Still waiting for any liberal here to back Carney on his cut spending , cut taxes on the wealthy while also claiming to massively increase military and infrastructure spending plan

Any of you red lefts support tax cuts for the rich and cut annual government spending from 9 to 2%?
 
Last edited:
JudoThrowFiasco said:
Still waiting for any liberal here to back Carney on his cut spending , cut taxes on the while also claiming to massively increase military and infrastructure spending plan

Any of you red lefts support tax cuts for the rich and cut annual government spending from 9 to 2%?
Click to expand...
Don't hold your breath!
 
rearnakedchoke said:
The costing is inaccurate. I’ll go with the economics guy rather than the down to earth guy who thought electricians capture lightning as part of their craft.
Click to expand...
the same economic guy whose platform was decided for him before he was even selected as leader ?

The same economic guy who claimed he was going to fix our economy by doing the inverse of what was tabled in his own platform ?

The same economic guy who won't repeal C69 ?

the same economic guy who has taken billions of dollars out of the country ?

the same economic guy whose actual platform continues down the same road that led us to the crisis we are currently in ?

the same economic guy who as economic advisor during this period ?

the same economic guy who during the debate claimed he never advised or supported these policies which is an admission of those policy failures ?

the same economic guy who is now running on a platform tabled for him that on thursday he claimed he never advised for ?

the same guy who says that doubling our deficit is somehow reducing spending from 9% to 2% ?

the same economic guy who justifies all this reckless spending because we are in a crisis that his party exacerbated with reciprocal tariffs and refusal to negotiate leaving us as one of only two countries who didn't receive a pause and reduced tariffs ?

the same economic guy who hasn't even acknowledged the tariffs on canola from china ?

the same economic guy whose party puts tariffs on chinese evs and batteries which in Canada is nothing burger of an industry compared to the canola and food industries in which China slapped tariffs on in response ?
 
"As my colleague J.P. pointed out, Poilievre’s platform says the government will bring in $20 billion in revenue from Canadian retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods during the 2025-26 fiscal year.

But it doesn’t look like all of that revenue will be set aside to help affected workers and fund tax cuts, which was the initial promise. There is also the question of how future tax cuts will be funded if the Conservative government’s goal is to pause tariffs during early negotiations with the U.S. administration.

The Conservative leader, asked today how he accounts for that discrepancy in addition to the existing federal deficit, skirted the question somewhat, saying his plan is to use all the money collected from tariffs and put it toward tax cuts on work, home building, investment and energy.

Poilievre said the $20-billion figure is based on projections from the current government.

He added that his government would set aside money for the previously announced “Keep Canadians Working Fund,” which he described as a loan program for companies that can maintain operations in the long term, but need some liquidity to avoid layoffs in the short term."


LOL @ cutting the deficit while also cutting taxes and "There is also the question of how future tax cuts will be funded if the Conservative government’s goal is to pause tariffs during early negotiations with the U.S. administration."

Oh, sorry. It's all going to trickle down to the poor. Riiiiiight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,218
Messages
57,975,528
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top