I'm good with any study that further analyzes effects of any type of medicine.
Are you good with the fact that the cumulative safety research into most vaccines, many of which have been given for decades, has been found to be of poor quality in meta analysis studies? Are you comfortable with adverse reporting systems that miss a significant percentage of adverse events?
And I'm good with maybe removing something like tetanus which is not transmittable person to person.
Careful, you’re wading into “anti-vaxxer” territory.
But before the diphtheria vaccine was released in the 40s we topped out at about 150,000 cases per year and mortality rate of 10-20% kids under 5 and adults over 40. Now its less than a case per year.
I can’t speak to diphtheria as I am largely ignorant on that topic/disease, however those numbers sound horrible and definitely warrant strong consideration for vaccination. From what I’ve read, there is no option to take just the diphtheria vaccine in the US which is problematic, no?
Regardless, this is still a personal choice that should not be mandated by any government, in my opinion.
Measles estimated 3 to 4 million people got measles each year in the United States, of which 500,000 were reported. From the 500,000 reported cases, 400 to 500 people died, 48,000 were hospitalized and 1,000 developed encephalitis (brain swelling) from measles.
I appreciate you using accurate numbers versus “cases” which over-inflate measles associated risks. The only thing you left out, was the impact of risk factors and increased understanding of how malnutrition underlies a significant percentage of severe measles outcomes. Do you think parents should be informed about risk factors for their particular child before vaccinating?
Mumps can lead to sterility in males and the list goes on and on.
Rubella can be particularly dangerous for pregnant women, as it can cause congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in the unborn child. The mortality rate for infants born with CRS is estimated to be around 30%
Overall they are a great thing even if we need to tweak them (aluminum you mentioned).
It seems like you are ducking my point regarding the quality of safety research being so poor. Disease rates and outcomes don’t justify poor safety research, at least not if we’re going to claim to be making evidence-based decisions and branding vaccination to be “safe.”
And yes there was always either a medical exception or religious exception in most States. Religious exception is mostly for Christian scientists.
You forgot philosophical exemptions which are currently available in 16 states.
But if majority are vaccinated then the few will be the infected.
Well, obviously this depends on which vaccine we’re talking about, right?
Now in Florida few will be vaccinated over time imo leading to issues down the road.
For some vaccines, waning is responsible for issues down the road. If a child catches measles and recovers (as is the case the vast majority of the time) they won’t have any issues with measles infections in the future. Not so much for the vaccinated, and already we have whispers of adding yet another booster shot.
Concerningly, now we have more adults catching measles, and some literature suggests adults are at risk of more severe outcomes from measles. Similarly, maternal antibodies wane more quickly in vaccinated mothers, meaning that vaccination has led to newborns (who are also high risk) being at higher risk- these are also issues that should be discussed, in my opinion.