this is so past preposterous its not even funny.This. Water shoes, aqua shoes, whatever you want to call them. I jump rope and do conditioning stuff in them, but have never tried running, and they cost like $5. The only different is you dont have individual toe cutouts.
When I was a kid, I had them and used them a lot, for innertubing in Texas. to walk back up to the ponit where you jumped in, you wanted shoes. IMO it was easier to walk barefoot, which I did.
The soles in aqua shoes would give me blisters if it was a long walk. Only thing in my life to ever give me blisters (boot camp USMC I didn't get blisters)
They also flop side to side when running, so you might land on the side of the shoe and end up splatting. If not moving location I will admit they would have similarities. So jumping rope I'd say better than normal shoes. But I'd rather jump rope barefoot. Oh wait I did that in highschool too. This is like comparing cheap 20 dollar tennis shoes to mizunos/assic/top end new balance shoes. You can't do it.
I'm not going to say you get what you pay for. a 60 buck pair of mizunos for me eat out my 130 buck pair of aasics by a mile. They start flatter so they keep a more continous shape throughout their life.
But comparing something thats a friggin slip on almost one size fits all shoe designed to keep glass out of your foot to something thats designed to allow your foot to work like your foot is preposterous.
Also like my 100 buck pair of brooks they seemed to make my foot slap the ground which can lead to stress fractures (not saying it would for everyone but its a concern to be aware of)