Examples have been given in this very thread. No, not the very specific scenario you're presenting, but I got news for ya, nobody cares. You LOVED that lawfare...as long it wasn't your team on the shitty end of it. Now you're crying about it. Awww. Too bad, so sad. Maybe don't cheer on opening these doors in the future, eh? Never know when it's gonna come back on ya. Just a thought.
Accusations of "lawfare" against Democrats are ridiculous. They never attacked or even discussed cases against opposition like Gaetz and his legal difficulties (correct me if I'm wrong here but I never saw anyone in office make an issue of it). Merrick Garland waited
two years to appoint special council to investigate Trump for January 6th, an incident you will never concede but one Trump was obviously guilty of.
Before he ever entered politics, Trump had been prosecuted for 4000 cases, he was a career criminal infamous for never paying his bills. He bragged about it. He had multiple fraud convictions under his belt, which you don't care about. The fact he continued committing crimes after he won the presidency doesn't make prosecutions "lawfare".
GOP politicians admitted he had earned his impeachments but didn't convict in the senate because he had "learned his lesson". Mitch McConnell said in no uncertain terms Trump was responsible for January 6th, and Liz Cheney threw her career away prosecuting him because what he had done was reprehensible.
You will never admit the truth because you don't care about right and wrong. Anything a Republican does is right and anything a Democrat does is wrong in your world, because you're partisan and all you care about is owning the libs. Mitch was Trump's willing servant for years and Cheney voted with Trump what, 90% of the time? 95%?
They knew Trump was guilty and deep down so do you.
Clinton was guilty and should have been convicted in the senate. He was ten times the president Trump could ever be but he was guilty, and a rapist. Like Trump.