Elections First Ever Transgender State Senator Elected

Ares Black said:
If you want to remain ignorant, that is a choice you are free to make.
[/QUOTE

The guy in that channel believes in absolute determinism and no free will whatsoever. He believes that every single thing about you is completely decided in your biology and DNA. He does not believe in any kind of free will.

I think he's one of the most detestable sad secks of s*** on the internet.


Of course, a guy like that would believe that every single trans person out there has no choice because he doesn't believe anyone has a choice about anything.
Click to expand...

The guy in that channel believes in absolute determinism and no free will whatsoever. He believes that every single thing about you is completely decided in your biology and DNA. He does not believe in any kind of free will.

I think he's one of the most detestable sad secks of s*** on the internet.


Of course, a guy like that would believe that every single trans person out there has no choice because he doesn't believe anyone has a choice about anything.
 
Staph infection said:
So because a very very small percentage of woman can be born with gonads, gender is not defined by a penis or vagina? There are always anomalies so this article it written more as op-Ed than anything else. They can try to skew it however they want but it is very simple.
Click to expand...

Think what it would mean for the world if in principle we defined everything by the extreme outliers instead of by the norm?


It's an absurd proposition.
 
Social Distance Warrior said:
it is truly irresponsible in every sense of the word.

"you may not know what gender you are...you could be a girl....you may have multiple feelings or genders..."

imagine telling this to a child.

now if you're an adult, sure...knock yourself out, it's a free country. but this is a dangerous path to introduce this to young children with little context, or to kids who know nothing about sexaulity.
Click to expand...

It does seem like a ridiculous form of stereotyping


Why can't we just admit that men have a spectrum of feelings between more feminine and more masculine and that women also have a spectrum of feeling between more feminine and more masculine.

Why when we find out that a young girl associates more with masculine activities, do we then try to say they were born in the wrong body? As if women can only be one way within a very, very narrow set of parameters.

It seems like the very narrow range of states of being that we allow for men and women is the problem rather than the fact that they were born in the wrong body.

It's absurd.
 
Koro_11 said:
Imagine humans 100 years from now laughing about that time people believed men could become women.
Click to expand...
Nobody believes it, not even the trannies. it's just that western society was, for a short time, held hostage by a bunch of sociopaths infiltrated in education and government that would send you to the gulag if they could, for misgendering.

thankfully, we're slowly moving away from the dark age of 2010-2024.
 
Wow that's surprising. Hopefully she does a good job and leaves a positive impact on her community. What she is is ultimately irrelevant. You just gotta do the job.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
Nobody believes it, not even the trannies. it's just that western society was, for a short time, held hostage by a bunch of sociopaths infiltrated in education and government that would send you to the gulag if they could, for misgendering.

thankfully, we're slowly moving away from the dark age of 2010-2024.
Click to expand...


You seem to be arguing for Western values which are based on religious and philosophical underpinnings and yet in another thread you're arguing for Trump in opposition to all of those religious and philosophical underpinnings....


You have some profound cognitive dissonance going on here friend.
 
terrapin said:
You seem to be arguing for Western values which are based on religious and philosophical underpinnings
Click to expand...
religious AND philosophical underpinnings are very different things.
you can be philosophically inclined to a certain belief in logic without basing it in some religious horseshit. they are often contradictory.
the fact that you don't understand the difference explains a lot.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
religious AND philosophical underpinnings are very different things.
you can be philosophically inclined to a certain belief in logic without basing it in some religious horseshit. they are often contradictory.
the fact that you don't understand the difference explains a lot.
Click to expand...
Okay, so what Western values are you defending philosophically that don't then exclude Trump from being a decent human being?









Logic and reason require honesty and Trump is a uniquely prolific liar. So just based on that you can't defend logic and reason unless you condemn Trump for being a liar.

And you can't defend logic and reason and at the same time, deny the reality that Trump is an exceptional liar.

I know you have profound cognitive dissonance here and this proves it.
 
terrapin said:
Okay, so what Western values are you defending philosophically that don't then exclude Trump from being a decent human being?









Logic and reason require honesty and Trump is a uniquely prolific liar. So just based on that you can't defend logic and reason unless you condemn Trump for being a liar.

And you can't defend logic and reason and at the same time, deny the reality that Trump is an exceptional liar.

I know you have profound cognitive dissonance here and this proves it.
Click to expand...
i'm not defending anything. i asked you a question that you couldn't answer.
you just blurted out a bucnh of religious horseshit when i asked what makes him a "loser", after winning the us presidency twice.

i know you won't answer and you'll keep writing these novels i honestly never read besides the first phrase or so. you're widely known around here as a very weird, possibly mentally ill dude. you just excrete these slogans about religious bullshit and have meltdowns over pages and pages.

so either answer the question without religious horseshit, or shut up.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
i'm not defending anything. i asked you a question that you couldn't answer.
you just blurted out a bucnh of religious horseshit when i asked what makes him a "loser", after winning the us presidency twice.

i know you won't answer and you'll keep writing these novels i honestly never read besides the first phrase or so. you're widely known around here as a very weird, possibly mentally ill dude. you just excrete these slogans about religious bullshit and have meltdowns over pages and pages.

so either answer the question without religious horseshit, or shut up.
Click to expand...
I just caught you in another thread condemning transgenders based on Western values. So what Western values are you using to condemn transgender people that don't then immediately exclude Trump also?

We have found common ground in that you use the Western intellectual tradition to condemn transgender people. I don't use it to condemn transgender people but we have found common ground in that we both agree about the value of the Western intellectual tradition.


So explain to me how you can support Trump while condemning transgender people based on Western tradition?
 
I just started watching the series the office and I am into the season where the accountant Angela starts dating the state Senator but she always says she is dating a Senator and Oscar keeps correcting her that he is a state senator.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
That's THIS thread, you absolute disaster of a mental case.
fucking hell.
Click to expand...
Defend your position then based on the Western tradition.. You think transgenderism is a problem but based on the Western tradition Trump would also be excluded from normal discourse.

Explain on what principle you pick and choose here.
 
terrapin said:
Defend your position then based on the Western tradition.. You think transgenderism is a problem but based on the Western tradition Trump would also be excluded from normal discourse.

Explain on what principle you pick and choose here.
Click to expand...
Where, here or in some other thread?
Name the planet you are on first.

<lol>
 
terrapin said:
It does seem like a ridiculous form of stereotyping


Why can't we just admit that men have a spectrum of feelings between more feminine and more masculine and that women also have a spectrum of feeling between more feminine and more masculine.

Why when we find out that a young girl associates more with masculine activities, do we then try to say they were born in the wrong body? As if women can only be one way within a very, very narrow set of parameters.

It seems like the very narrow range of states of being that we allow for men and women is the problem rather than the fact that they were born in the wrong body.

It's absurd.
Click to expand...
Why are you replying to banned accounts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,311
Messages
58,274,814
Members
175,989
Latest member
gorakk

Share this page

Back
Top