First computer has passed the Turing test

[flanellograf]

I see you edited, and this version is even more embarrassing. Yeah, except he wasn't saying that at all.

Now you are not even making any sense. Kurzweil predicted that computers will pass the turing test, and match human intelligence, by 2029.
And stop being an ass. It's a fascinating subject, no need to sour it. Find someone else to argue with, if that is your only intent.

 

[Heefer Madness]

Now you are not even making any sense. Kurzweil predicted that computers will pass the turing test, and match human intelligence, by 2029.
And stop being an ass. It's a fascinating subject, no need to sour it. Find someone else to argue with, if that is your only intent.

No, this is simply wrong. Kurzweil predicted that the singularity will happen around 2045, but he also predited that computers will routinely pass the Turing test before 2030. They are obviously not the same thing, even to Kurzweil. Not that I agree with his views, I'm just calling you on your bullshit.

 

[flanellograf]

No, this is simply wrong. Kurzweil predicted that the singularity will happen around 2045, but he also predited that computers will routinely pass the Turing test before 2030. They are obviously not the same thing, even to Kurzweil. Not that I agree with his views, I'm just calling you on your bullshit.

No, I'm correct about the human intelligence thing. He predicts that we will have conscious machines by 2029. Just look at the same wiki article you linked.

Now, as far as the singularity goes, I've apparently misremembered what it means, as I took it to mean the point where artificial intelligence matches/exceeds human intelligence. Which makes more sense to me, than the more ambiguous and esoteric explanation(s) that apparently Kurzweil proposed that I'm refreshing my memory with now.

My point was that his other predictions about 2029 don't really gel with just merely passing the turing test (although again; fooling 30% of people that it is a 13 year old Ukrainian boy doesn't really sound like passing the test to me).
Apparently he seems to have a lot more strict interpretation of the Turing Test should entail, in that case.

And seriously, is it so hard to stop being a douche?

 

[Deleted member 429137]

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/turing-test-not-so-fast/

I'm sure someone already brought this up, but just in case...

 

[5H3RD0G]

I'll make it malfunction by asking some ridiculous questions. :icon_lol:

 

[650lb Sumo]

AI model passes Turing Test ‘better than a human’

OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 model was more convincing than an actual human, researchers say

www.independent.co.uk

A leading AI chatbot has passed a Turing Test more convincingly than a human, according to a new study.

Participants in a blind test judged OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 model, which powers the latest version of ChatGPT, to be a human 'significantly more often than actual humans'.

The Turing Test, first proposed by the British computer scientist Alan Turing in 1950,

is meant to be a barometer of whether artificial intelligence can match human intelligence.

The test involves a text-based conversation with a human interrogator, who has to assess whether the interaction is with another human or a machine.

Nearly 300 participants took part in the latest study, which ran tests for various chatbots and large language models (LLMs).

OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 was judged to be a human 73 per cent of the time when instructed to adopt a persona.

'We think this is pretty strong evidence that [AI chatbots] do [pass the Turing Test],' Dr Cameron Jones,

a postdoc researcher from UC San Diego who led the study, wrote in a post to X. 'And 4.5 was even judged to be human significantly more often than actual humans.'

It is not the first time that an AI programme has beaten the Turing Test, though the researchers from UC San Diego who conducted the study claim this to be the most comprehensive proof that the benchmark has been passed.

Spoiler

 

[Kowboy On Sherdog]

 

[Law Talkin’ Guy]

I’ve always wondered how those the “click here to confirm you’re not a robot” can’t be done by bots. Why can’t a bot just easily click to box?

 

[Stoic1]

It's going to get weaponized. It's going to get loose. We are going to die.

 

[Fury]

"And 4.5 was even judged to be human significantly more often than actual humans."

Seems like a flawed test

 

[lowlife]

I've been using 4.5, it's impressive but still clearly an llm. For me the real question is consciousness, subjective experience. Is that something that can be created, or is it something that already exists? If consciousness is actually fundamental then maybe AI can be something akin to human biology, a conduit for consciousness so to speak. And if it's like most believe and emergent, is it something that requires biology? Where does the self realization that we ourselves posess come from? Fascinating stuff.

 

[GtehMVP]

I’ve always wondered how those the “click here to confirm you’re not a robot” can’t be done by bots. Why can’t a bot just easily click to box?

Without looking it up, I recall it being the way the mouse moves the cursor to the click part. Unlike machines, or movements aren't in a perfect line.

Can anyone confirm this? I wonder if it's some misinformation I registered as legit.

 

[fungi]

Don't know if this is new but interesting nonetheless.

http://gizmodo.com/this-is-the-first-computer-in-history-to-have-passed-th-1587780232

Are we on the way toward advanced AI and the singularity? How significant is this test?

"Duped one in three judges"...
How big was the sample? Was it statistically significant?

 

[lsa]

"Duped one in three judges"...
How big was the sample? Was it statistically significant?

"Last seen Jan 18, 2021
Dont expect him to answer

 

[fungi]

"Last seen Jan 18, 2021
Dont expect him to answer

True.
These necrothreads are a hassle.
Who has the time to check post dates, etc?!!

 

[DanSavage]

The test is named after computer pioneer Alan Turing. To pass it, a computer program needs to dupe 30 percent of human judges in five-minute, text-based chats, a feat that until now had never been accomplished.

“Eugene” was created by a team based in Russia, and passed the test organized by the University of Reading just barely, by duping one in three judges. It should also be noted that a chatbot successfully pretending to be a 13-year-old boy for whom English is a second language ain’t exactly Hal 9000. There’s no artificial intelligence at work here; it’s more clever gamesmanship by Eugene’s creators.

So, the test had three judges and it fooled just one of them?