1. The official Sherdog Store is back! Check it out! » Discuss it here! »

First computer has passed the Turing test

Discussion in 'Mayberry Lounge' started by Raiman, Jun 8, 2014.

  1. Raiman Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    4
  2. elzar Red Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    8,475
    Likes Received:
    0
    *Turing

    the computer only has to fool 30 per cent of evaluators. via text message. not sure what to make of it.
     
  3. Raiman Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ow yeah Alan Turing my bad.
     
  4. weich Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    11,490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Colorado
    I think this is a significant step. Obviously there is still a lot of room to go, but this is impressive all the same.
     
  5. flanellograf Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    It depends on how they did it. If it's only about trickery, and not actual comprehension (i.e. mimicking brain functions) on the part of the computer program, then it's a lot less significant. For instance, if even partially proper comprehension existed already, then google translate would be fuck tonne better.
    The computer was also supposed to act like a 13 year old, which should be significantly easier.
     
  6. ExquisitExamplE Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2014
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally speaking, I believe that ALL technologies, programs, ideas and inventions can be used for good or for ill, and that the potential of a thing being used for ill does NOT make its invention automatically negative. I also believe that the reaction from academia is inappropriate at this time. Like a no smoking sign at a gas station, this fear-mongering is only instructional to the small minority of halfwits who lack the foresight to have come to the same conclusion, that it is POSSIBLE for an artificial intelligence program to be used for nefarious purposes, and the seriousness of the implications of that possibility.
     
  7. Raiman Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    4
    It still mimicked a human being.
     
  8. AgentOrange24 Ice Cold

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Morehead, Kentucky
    Destroy it now before it learns and evolves.
     
  9. flanellograf Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    No. It passed for a human being. That's not necessarily equivalent to mimicking human brain processes, even if we only talk about the functionality and not the actual neurons etc. Although AI has done serious strides, it's still not there. Last I checked we were able to simulate a mosquitos brain, or something like that. The computational power to mimic an actual brain, i.e. the singularity, is estimated to be achieved around 2024.
     
  10. krayzah1 White Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    Searle's Chinese Room.
     
  11. flanellograf Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unfortunately that's a naive argument, predating the understanding of the brain we have today. There is nothing magical about the brain, it's a machine, even if it's biological.
    And in fact, many separate non-conscious atomic processes do seem to add up to an emergent property which we call consciousness.
    There is an interesting counter-argument, where if you substitute each neuron for a artificial circuit exactly mimicking the functionality of that neuron, in time you will get a fully functioning artificial brain. There is no reasonable reason for why that artificial brain would be a "philosophical zombie" and didn't have consciousness.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2014
  12. JonesBones Excuse my contraflow

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    28,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    It has nothing to do with that. It's the philosophical argument that one can't distinguish between somebody who can speak with you in a language, and one who truly understands it. Somebody could whisper in my ear, or tell me what to type in German for example, and it could fool a German speaker, into thinking I actually understand the language. But I don't. I am only following instructions. I could pass as a German speaker on this forum, if I hired a German to give me instructions. There would be no way to tell if I actually understand the language, or am just following a program.
     
  13. zackryder Long Island Iced Z Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    11,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island, New York
    it has begun!!!

    [​IMG]

    the rise of the AI

    [​IMG]

    & inevitably

    [​IMG]
     
  14. PAUonePUNCH Black Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    5,758
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vault 11
    I read the title as "First computer has passed Drug test."
     
  15. saugeye killah No need rope hold up pants.

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denver
    In before "Skynet".

    edit: or not. In after Skynet..
     
  16. Heefer Madness White Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    There are literally dozens of replies to Searle's argument, it's certainly not consensus between scientists and philosophers. I personally think he underestimates computational technology and overestimates the uniqueness of the human brain. We'll have to wait and see.
     
  17. Lead /Led/ like a long breadstick with glasses Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    40,944
    Likes Received:
    5,338
    Reasonable reason
     
  18. WorldofWarcraft Holy Paladin Banned

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    20,162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
    ...and so it has begun...
     
  19. Philippou4Life Black Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,466
    Likes Received:
    0
    Statistically speaking, if it can fool 30% of people today, it'll only take around 6 years before it fools us 100% of the time.

    That's when true A.I. will be born.

    They talked about how a computer will never be able to be as complex as a human brain, I'm starting to believe that we are part of the self-fulfilling prophecy with our own curiosity to make it absolutely sure that there WILL be a computer that's as smart as us--I mean, why not right?
     
  20. WARRIOR POET Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    0
    right.

    the "AI" does not even know it is trying to be a person. it does not even understand what a person is. it is just something programmed by a person with certain responses and probabilities.

    a glorified teddy ruxpin
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.