The fact that you've abandoned your original argument - which pertained to Nog's TDs - and shifted to an entirely different argument - which pertains to Nog's TDD - indicates to me that you're not equipped to argue with anything resembling logical coherence or rigor. I'll take this as you conceding the point. But to be clear, I'll walk you through what just happened argumentatively speaking. You said that Nog couldn't take Ngannou down because (a) his wrestling is allegedly superior to Nog's and (b) he weighs more than Nog. You said nothing about Nog's TDD. And the reason is obvious: Because just like getting taken down by Ricco was to Nog's advantage - Nog spent the entire fight threatening from the guard with triangles, omoplatas, armbars, and kimuras, hence his victory - Ngannou taking Nog down would be to Nog's advantage. (Even Fedor realized after their first fight how much better Nog's already deadly guard had gotten by the time they fought again in the aborted 2004 GP finals match, hence his decision in the third fight to spend as little time in Nog's guard as possible.) Ignoring your illogical deflection, the point remains: Nog took down plenty of people in his career who were better wrestlers and/or bigger than him. Deflect and evade all you want, your argument has no merit.
A can who weighed 375 pounds and who beat the fuck out of the greatest kickboxer to ever live in kickboxing matches...twice.
This is a logical fallacy known as strawmanning. In the course of trying to win an argument with me, rather than respond to my actual argument - which, in counter to your claim that Nog couldn't take Ngannou down because Ngannou outweighs him by 30 pounds, was a counterargument in the form of pointing out that Nog was able to take down Sapp who outweighed him by 140 pounds - you invented an argument that I never made - that Nog is the GOAT because he was able to take Sapp down - because it is easier to refute. The problem for you is not only did I never make the case that Nog is the GOAT because he was able to take Sapp down, but I don't even think that Nog is the GOAT. Fedor is.
You're really struggling to keep things together in that little brain of yours, aren't you?
So, when it comes to Ngannou, you are willing to consider extenuating circumstances, mitigating factors, etc., but when it comes to Fedor, he just sucks full stop? I see in your subsequent responses that you're even comparing Lewis in his prime to Cro Cop past his prime. To Ngannou and Lewis, you extend benefits of the doubt and attempt to put their best foot forward, but to Fedor and Cro Cop, you extend nothing and attempt only to make them look as bad as possible. This is called a double standard. Yours is showing.
That "fossil" who you're so quick to disparage had a wrestling career that astronomically dwarfs Blaydes'. In the unlikely event that you'd actually like to learn some facts, you can educate yourself here:
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-wrestling/2016/07/72187/mark-coleman-alpha-buckeye.
Also, when you say that Blaydes "hasnt gotten frank down in 2 fights," I have to wonder again if you've actually seen any of the fights that you're talking about with such authority, because he took him down in the first fight, and not once...
...but twice.
*****awaits inevitable deflections, strawmans, evasions, and ignorance******
