- Joined
- Jan 1, 2008
- Messages
- 51,592
- Reaction score
- 14,489
Of course no source we have has total credibility but I would say Coker has a lot more of it than Overeem and he has carried on saying the same thing long after he had any attachment to Strikeforce or Fedor, look at that retriospective Strikeforce interview him and others involved did awhile ago.
The Coker story as well has the advantage that it brings in a lot of real collaborating evidence, what evidence does Overeem have to back up his story? claiming that Fedor waited until he was training for K-1(but not booked in the WGP) to ask for the fight? that Fedor's camp talked about drug testing for a potential fight? doesn't really add up to much does it? that he has to fall back to this stuff rather than bringing up a situation where he signed to fight Fedor and Fedor refused tells me that never happened.
Look at this thread honestly and tell me that the anti Fedor talk here is more honest, you can't can you?
I'm not going to read through all this drivel and decide who is more honest or more likely to be honest cause I frankly don't know. I just think it's absurd to use anything Coker says as a source. Coker was basically partners with Fedor even now they are still in contact so I still don't expect him to say anything different. On top of that he just doesn't come across as the type of guy to turn around and talk bad about you once he realizes he doesn't need you anymore. Honestly this is like asking Frankie Edgar who he think will win Connor or Eddie. Coker is a promoter and a very good one which means he will need to hide things and be dishonest when the time calls for it you can't trust these people.